摘要
为比较内痔结扎悬吊加皮桥整形术与传统的外剥内扎术治疗脱垂性环状混合痔的临床疗效,将64例脱垂性环状混合痔患者随机分为两组各32例,治疗组采用内痔结扎悬吊加皮桥整形术,对照组采用外剥内扎术,比较两组的疗效。结果显示,两组在平均愈合时间、肛门狭窄等方面差异无统计学意义(P〉O.05),两组术后其他并发症、治愈率及复发率均有显著性差异(P〈O.05)。结果表明,内痔结扎悬吊加皮桥整形术治疗脱垂性环状混合痔临床疗效明显优于外剥内扎术。
This study was to compare the therapeutic effects of ligation & suspension for internal hemor- rhoids plus skin bridge plasticity and classical procedure of external dissection & internal ligation, for trea- ting prolapsed circumferential mixed hemorrhoids. The 64 patients with this hemorrhoids were randomly divided into two groups, 32 cases for each; then treatment group was given internal hemorrhoids ligation suspension plus skin bridge plasticity while control group was given external dissection and internal liga- tion, their therapeutic effects were compared each other. As results,in average healing time for wound, ste- nosis of anus,etc there was no statistical difference( P 〉0.05) between both groups, but in curative rate and other postoperative complication and recurrence rate, significant difference ( P 〈0.05). Results show that ligation ~ suspension for internal hemorrhoids plus skin bridge plasticity is significantly superior to classic procedure of external dissection & internal ligation in the treatment of prolapsed circumferential mixed hemorrhoids.
出处
《中国肛肠病杂志》
2013年第7期27-29,共3页
Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词
痔
手术
临床观察
Hemorrhoid
Operation
Clinical observation