两种静脉输液拔针法的效果比较

Comparisons of two needle-withdrawing methods

目的探讨传统静脉输液拔针法与改良静脉输液拔针法的效果。方法将100例行静脉输液患者分为对照组50例(输液255例次)和改良组50例(输液255例次),对照组采用传统拔针法,改良组采用改良拔针法。比较两组患者拔针后并发症发生情况。结果改良组患者疼痛和皮下瘀血或穿刺点出血发生率较对照组低,两组比较,P<0.001,差异具有统计学意义。结论改良式静脉拔针法可降低静脉输液拔针后并发症的发生率,提高静脉输液安全性,值得临床推广应用。

Objective To investigate the effects of the routine needle-withdrawing method and improved needle-withdrawing method.Methods One hundred patients undergoing intravenous transfusion were randomized into the control group and the improvement group（255 times of transfusion）,with 50 cases in each group：the former was treated with routine needle-withdrawing method and the latter with the improved method.Complications after needle-withdruing were compared between the two groups.Result The rates of pains,subcutaneous bleeding or bleeding at the puncture points in the improvement group were all significantly lower than those of the control group（P0.001）.Conclusion The improved needle-withdrawing method is effective in reducing the rate of postwithdrawal complications and improve the safety of intravenous transfusion.