期刊文献+

鼻咽癌常规放疗和调强放疗致皮肤损伤的对比分析 被引量:4

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma conventional radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy skin injury clinical analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析鼻咽癌采用常规放疗和调强放疗在皮肤损伤发生等级的差异。方法 :将47例鼻咽癌患者,随机分为常规放疗组23例、调强放疗组24例,鼻咽剂量均为DT 66-70 Gy。观察比较两组放射性皮肤损伤的发生率。结果:常规放疗和调强放疗组1、2、3级皮肤损伤的发生率分别为43.5%(10/23)、34.8%(8/23)、21.7%(5/23)和29.2%(7/24)、20.8%(5/24)、50.0%(12/24),两组均未出现0级和4级病例,两组比较3级皮肤损伤差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:鼻咽癌调强放疗3级皮肤损伤发生率明显高于常规放疗。 Objective: A comparative analysis of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma using conventional radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in skin injury happened levels of study.Methods: 47 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients,randomly divided into conventional radiotherapy group of 23 cases,intensity-modulated radiotherapy group of 24 cases.Nasopharyngeal dose are DT 66-70 Gy.Observation compared between the two groups radioactive skin injury incidence.Results:The conventional radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy group 1,2,3 level skin injury incidence was 43.5%(10/23),34.8%(8/23),21.7%(5/23) and 29.2%(7/24),20.8%(5/24),50.0%(12/24),two groups of all did not appear grade 0 level and grade 4 cases,two groups of comparisons,grade 3 skin injury has statistical significance(P0.05).Conclusion: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma grade 3 skin injury incidence rate is obviously higher than that of the conventional radiotherapy.
出处 《南通大学学报(医学版)》 2013年第4期307-309,共3页 Journal of Nantong University(Medical sciences)
关键词 鼻咽癌 常规放疗 调强放疗 放射性皮肤损伤 nasopharyngeal carcinoma conventional radiotherapy intensity-modulated radiotherapy radioactive skin injury
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献39

共引文献187

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部