期刊文献+

县域尺度上产业转入地的梯度分布——基于随机有效前沿模型的技术进步分析

Industrial Gradient Transfer Distribution Based on County Scale——Based on Analysis of Technical Progress of the Stochastic Effective Frontier Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 技术外溢具有梯度分布特征,总是从技术效率高的地区指向技术效率低的地区,按照技术效率差距最小的方式进行转移。基于此,产业转移也具有梯度分布的特征。研究县域尺度上承接产业转移梯度分布,对于地区经济发展具有重要意义。采用随机有效前沿模型,通过分解全要素生产率增长率,可将吉林省县级区域按照产业承接地的梯度分布划分为五类地区。根据不同类别地区的不同技术效率特征,应采取不同的产业转移策略。 Technology SpiUovers is with the characteristics of gradient distribution. Technology always transfers from areas with high technological efficiency to areas with low technological efficiency according to the smallest gap of technological efficiency. Thus, industrial transfer has the characteristics of gradient distribution too. To study undertaking industrial gradient transfer distribution plays an important role in regional economic develop- ment. Based on effective frontier model, the country-scale regions in Jilin Province can be divided into 5 regions in accordance with gradient transfer of undertaking place by the decomposition of total factor productivity and growth rate. Different industrial transfer strategies should be applied according to different characteristics of effi- ciency in different regions.
作者 张肃 诺敏
出处 《税务与经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期55-60,共6页 Taxation and Economy
基金 吉林省科技厅软科学项目"吉林省中小城镇承接产业转移研究"(项目编号:20110656)的阶段性成果
关键词 县域经济 产业转移梯度 随机有效前沿模型 全要素生产率增长率分解 county-scale economy industrial transfer gradient stochastic effective frontier model decompositionof total factor productivity and growth rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1杨伟文,余丽娟.外商直接投资对我国出口贸易的效应分析[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2004,10(6):759-764. 被引量:3
  • 2Aigner, D. J., C. A. K. Loven, and P. Schmidt,1997, "Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models."Journal of Econometrics, 6:1, July, 21-37.
  • 3Kumbhakar, S. C. and C. A. K. Loven, (2000), Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Kumbhakar, S. C. (2000), "Estimation and decomposition of productivity change when production is not efficient:a panel data approach."Econometric Review, 19, 425-460.
  • 5Kalirajan, K. P., M. B. Obwona and S. Zhao. (1996), "A Decompositon of Total Factor Productivity Growth: The Case of Chinese Agricultural Growth Before and After Reforms. " American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78,331-338.
  • 6Jondrow, James, C. A. K. Love[l, I. S. Materov, P. Schmidt. (1982), "On the Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model." Journal of Econometrics, 19, 23:8, 233-239.
  • 7Meeusenm, W., and J. van den Broeck. (1977), "Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Producton Functions with Composed Error".International Economic Reviews, 18:2, 435-44.
  • 8Nishimizu, M. and J. M. Page. (1982), "Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Technical Efficiency Change:Dimensions of Productivity Change in Yugoslavia, 1965-78. " The Economic Journal, 92, 929-936.
  • 9Kim, Sangho and Gwangho Han. (2001), "A decomposition of total factor productivity growth in Korean manufacturing industry." Journal of Productivity Analysis, 16, 3, p269.
  • 10Kim, Sangho. (2003), "Identifying and estimating sources of technical inefficiency in Korean manufacturing industry. " Contemporary Economic Policy, 21, 1, p132.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部