期刊文献+

取消化石能源补贴对我国居民收入分配的影响——基于投入产出价格模型的模拟分析 被引量:4

Effects of the Cancellation of Fossil Fuel Subsidies on Income Distribution in China:A Simulation Analysis Based on the Input-output Price Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章在总结不同收入居民能源消费特征的基础上,采用投入产出价格模型,分别在有无政府价格管制的情境下,模拟分析了中国取消化石能源补贴的分配影响。结果表明:(1)取消不同能源补贴的分配影响有所差异,从综合影响看,取消交通燃料补贴的累进性最强,取消煤炭补贴的累进性最弱,而取消电力补贴的影响是累退的,其中取消成品油补贴对居民冲击最大,其次是电力,煤炭的影响最小;(2)补贴改革对居民的间接影响大于直接影响;(3)政府的价格管制能够减轻补贴改革的负向冲击。能源补贴改革可从累进性强、影响力小的能源如交通燃料开始,并采取一定的补偿措施以减轻改革对贫困居民的冲击。 Based on the summary of the energy consumption characteris- tics of residents with different income levels, this paper adopts the input- output price model to simulate the distributional effects of the cancellation of fossil fuel subsidies with and without government price regulation. The re- suits are shown as follows: firstly, the distributional effects of the cancella- tion of fossil fuel subsidies differ; as for the comprehensive effect, the can- cellation of transportation fuel subsidies has the strongest progressivity, and the cancellation of coal subsidies weakest; the cancellation of electricity subsi- dies is regressive; the cancellation of refined oil subsidies has the greatest shocks to residents, followed by the cancellation of electricity and coal subsidies~ second- ly, the indirect effect of subsidies reform on residents is larger than the direct one; thirdly, government price regulation can weaken the negative shocks of subsidies reform. The reform of energy subsidies can start from energy with strong progressivity and weak effects like transportation fuel, and take some subsidies measures to weaken the shocks of the reform to the poor.
作者 蒋竺均 邵帅
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期17-27,共11页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71003068) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC790081) 上海市教育委员会科研创新重点项目(11ZS70) 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2010BJB011) 上海市"晨光计划"(12CG45) 上海市重点学科建设项目(B801 B802) 上海财经大学数理经济学教育部重点实验室开放课题(201301KF01) 上海财经大学"211工程"四期重点学科建设项目的资助
关键词 化石能源补贴 投入产出价格模型 分配影响 价格管制 fossil fuel subsidy input-output price model distribution- al effect price regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1李虹,董亮,谢明华.取消燃气和电力补贴对我国居民生活的影响[J].经济研究,2011,46(2):100-112. 被引量:49
  • 2林伯强.能源价格上涨将带来成本推动型通胀[N].新浪财经,2011-2-28.
  • 3林伯强,蒋竺均,林静.有目标的电价补贴有助于能源公平和效率[J].金融研究,2009(11):1-18. 被引量:68
  • 4Andriamihaja N, Vecchi G. An evaluation of the welfare impact of higher energy prices in Madagascar[R]. Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 106, 2007.
  • 5Clements B, Jung H, Gupta S. Real and distributive effects of petroleum price libera- lization: The case of Indonesia[J]. Developing Economies, 2007, 45(2) : 220-237.
  • 6Gangopadhyay S, Ramaswami B, Wadhwa W. Reducing subsidies on household fuels in India: How will it affect the poor[J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(18): 2326-2336.
  • 7IEA. World energy outlook[M]. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2008.
  • 8IEA. World energy outlook[M]. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2010.
  • 9Jensen J, Tarr D. Trade, foreign exchange, and energy policies in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Reform agenda, economic implications, and impact on the poor[R]. Policy Re- search Working Paper No. 2768 The World Bank, 2002.
  • 10Kebede B. Energy subsidies and costs in urban Ethiopia: The cases of kerosene and e- lectricity[J]. Renewable Energy, 2006, 31(13): 2140-2151.

二级参考文献40

  • 1林伯强.中国电力发展:提高电价和限电的经济影响[J].经济研究,2006,41(5):115-126. 被引量:48
  • 2曾鸣,于静冉,王鹤.一种新的大用户进入电力市场购电模式研究[J].华北电力技术,2007(4):26-29. 被引量:6
  • 3林伯强,2009a.《阶梯电价应当是居民电价改革的突破口》,《21世纪经济报道》.
  • 4林伯强,2009b.《解决高成本问题是加快发展清洁能源关键》,《21世纪经济报道》.
  • 5Babu Nahata, Alexei Izyumov, Vladimir Busygin and Anna Mishura, 2007, "An Application of Ramsey Model in Transition Economy: a Russian Case Study", Energy Economics, Vol. 29, 105 - 125.
  • 6Bradley, M. D. , Colvin, J. , Panzar, J. C. , 1999, "On Setting Prices and Testing Cross - subsidy with Accounting Data", Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 16 No. 1, 83 - 100.
  • 7Caroline Freund, Christine Wallich, 1997, "Public - sector Price Reforms in Transition Economies : Who Gains? Who Loses.'? The Case of Household Energy Prices in Poland", Economic Development and Cultural Change.
  • 8Corden Max, 1957, "The Calculation of the Cost of Protection", Economic Record, Vol. 33, 29 - 51.
  • 9Das, P., Sfinivasan, P.V., 1999, "Demand for Telephone Usage in India", Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 11 No. 2, 177-194.
  • 10Faulhaber, G. R. , 1975, " Cross- subsidization: Pricing in Public Enterprises", The American Economic Review, Vol. 65 No. 5, 966 - 977.

共引文献85

同被引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部