期刊文献+

植物内生放线菌Hhs.015~T对油菜菌核病的防治效果 被引量:2

Inhibitive Effect of an Endophytic Actinomycete Hhs.015~T Against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为有效地防治油菜菌核病,通过试验筛选得到一株植物内生放线菌Hhs.015T,可显著抑制病原菌菌丝生长和菌核萌发。将Hhs.015T的菌悬液和无菌上清液分别于接种前1d、接种同时和接种后1d3个时期喷施油菜叶片和茎秆。结果表明,Hhs.015T菌悬液和无菌上清液对油菜菌核病的防效之间不存在显著性差异,而不同喷施时期的防治效果则以接种同时喷施叶片的防效最好,菌悬液和无菌上清液防效分别可达91.06%和85.22%。大田试验中,于初花期喷施Hhs.015T发酵液的防效可达41.27%,稀释后防治效果逐步降低。通过扫描电镜观察发现,Hhs.015T对油菜菌核病菌菌丝生长具有明显抑制作用,并引起菌丝原生质体外渗、顶端膨大等现象;在菌丝侵染叶片时,能明显减少菌丝量,减缓侵染垫的形成,从而抑制菌丝的入侵。可见,植物内生放线菌Hhs.015T具有较好生防潜力,可用于油菜菌核病的防治工作。 In this study,we screened an endophytic actinomycete Hhs.015T,which could suppressed the growth of hyphae and the germination of Sclerotinia significantly.Cell-free filtrate and cell suspensions were sprayed on the leaves and stems of rapes at one day before inoculation,0 day after inoculation and one day after inoculation.The results showed that there was no significant differences between the efficacy of cell-free filtrate and cell suspensions.The best control effect,91.06% for suspensions and 85.22% for cell free filtrate,were achieved by spraying the cell-free filtrate and cell suspension at the same time as inoculation.In the field experiments,the efficacy of applying Hhs.015T to rape plants at the flowering stage reached 41.27% and decreased gradually with the dilution.Scanning electron microscopy revealed that endophytic actinomycete Hhs.015T could suppressed the growth of hyphae significantly and could cause leakage of hyphal cytoplasm and irregular swelling of top hyphal.It could reduce the biomass of hyphal and slow down the formation of infection cushions and then suppress the infection of hypha.Hhs.015T could be used to control the sclerotinia rot with a good development prospect.
出处 《西北农业学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期162-167,共6页 Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica
基金 公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201103016) 高等学校学科创新引智计划(B07049)
关键词 油菜 油菜菌核病 内生放线菌 防治效果 电镜观察 Rapeseed Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Endophytic actinomycete Control efficacy Electron microscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1IALili(李丽丽).Overview of the research of the rape disease [J]. Oil Crops of China ,1994,16(1) :79 81.
  • 2GAOXiaoning(高小宁),CHENJinyan(陈金艳),HUANG11I.ili(黄丽丽), et al. Screening of antagonistic endophyticbacteria and their roles in control of Sclerotinia sclerotio- rum in canola [J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 20 10,12 (2): 161-167 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  • 3LIWei(李伟),ZHOUYijun(周益军).SensitivityofSclerotinia sclerotiorum isolates to carbendazim in Jiangsu province [J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Science, 2007,29(1 ) : 63 68 (in Chinese with English ab- stract).
  • 4CHENXiiun(陈夕军),CAOMinjuan(曹敏娟),WANGYan(王艳), et al Procymidone resistant mutagenesis ofSclerotinia sclerotiorum isolated from rapeseed stem [J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Science , 2009,31 (4) : 503-508 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  • 5CHENBiyun(陈碧云),ZHOULecong(周乐聪),LUZhip—ing(陆致平).Fermentation of trichoderma viride and suppression of rapeseed Sclerotinia stem rot by the fermenta- tion filtrate [J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control ,2001,17(2);67-70(in Chinese with English ab- stract).
  • 6Li G Q, Huang H C, Miao H J. Biological control of sclero- tinia diseases ofrapeseed by aerial applications of themyco- parasite Coniothyrium minitans [J]. European Journal ofPlant Pathology, 2006,114:345- 355.
  • 7YANLiying(晏立英),ZHOULecong(周乐聪),TANYu—jun(谈宇俊),et al. Isolation and identification of biocontrolbacteria from rhizosphere of rapeseed LJJ. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Science ,2005,27(2): 55- 61 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  • 8Stone J K,Bacon C W,White J F. An overview of endophyt- ic microbes: endophytism defined [J]. Microbial Endo- phytes,2000(1) :29-33.
  • 9Miller S L. Functional diversity in fungi [J]. Canadian Jour- nal Botany,1995,73(S1) :50 -57.
  • 10荣晓莹,詹刚明,张荣,孙广宇.植物内生放线菌FQ-017对番茄苗期灰霉和叶霉病的防治作用[J].西北农业学报,2008,17(4):143-148. 被引量:6

二级参考文献49

共引文献49

同被引文献28

  • 1Rubin E J,Akerley B J,Novik V N,et al.In vivo transposi-tion of mariner-based elements in enteric bacteria and My-cobacteria[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1999,96: 1645-1650.
  • 2Liu B,Huang L,Buchenauer H,et al.Isolation and partialcharacterization of an antifungal protein from the endo-phytic Bacillus subtilis strain EDR4[J].Pesticide Bio-chemistry and Physiology,2010,98(2):305-311.
  • 3Bing Liu,Lili Huang,Zhensheng Kang.Evaluation of endo-phytic bacterial.strains as antagonist,sof take-all in wheatcaused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici in green-house and field[J].J Pest Sci,2011,84: 257-264.
  • 4Le Breton Y,MohaPatra N P,Haldenwang W G.In vivorandom mutagenesis of Bacillus subtilis by use of TnYLB-1,a mariner-based transposon[J].APPI Environ Microbi-ol,2006,72: 327-333.
  • 5LIU Jun(刘俊).Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CO 6 em-ploy slipopeptides as major weapons to control Moniliniafructicola and secrets y-polyglutamic acid to poromot itsfruit surface colonization[D].Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultur-al Univercity(南京农业大学),2010:142-143.
  • 6J Spizizen J.Transformation of biochemically deficientstrains of Bacillus subtilis by deoxyribonucleate[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1958,44: 1072-1078.
  • 7Yong F E,Spizizen J.Physiological and genetic factors af-fecting transformation of Bacillus subtilis[J].Bacteriol,1961,81:823-829.
  • 8Wang X.Li Mt Yan Q,et al.Across genus plasmid trans-formation between Bacillus subtilis and Escherich coli andthe effect of Escherich coli on the transforming ability offree plasmid DNA[J].Current Microbiology,2007,54(6):450-456.
  • 9Yang Mingming,Zhang Weiwei,Zhang Xifeng,et al.Con-struction and characterization of a novel maltose inducibleexpression vector in Bacillus subtilis[J].Biotechol Lett,2006,28-1713-1718.
  • 10Patrick J E,Kearns D B.MinJ(YvjD)is a topological de-terminant of cell division in Bacillus subtilis[J].Mol Mi-crobiol,2008,70(5):1166-1179.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部