期刊文献+

双重血浆滤过治疗重型系统性红斑狼疮的疗效观察 被引量:3

Effectiveness of double filtration plasmapheresis for severe systemic lupus erythematosus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价双重血浆滤过(double filtration plasmapheresis,DFPP)对合并狼疮肾炎(1u—pus nephritis,LN)的重型系统性红斑狼疮(systemic lupus erythematosus,SLE)的治疗效果。方法36例合并LN的重型SLE患者,根据治疗方法分为药物治疗组(对照组)和药物治疗+DFPP组(DFPP组),每组18例。观察治疗前后肾功能相关指标、免疫学指标以及系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)的变化情况。结果对照组和DFPP组治疗后24h尿蛋白定量、BUN、SCr、血清胱抑素C均显著下降(P〈0.05),组间比较,DFPP组以上各项指标下降更明显(P〈0.05)。对照组和DFPP治疗组血白蛋白水平治疗前后差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。对照组治疗后ANA阳性率、抗ds-DNA阳性率、IgG、IgA、IgM、ESR下降(P〈0.05),补体C3、CA升高(P〈0.05),DFPP治疗组治疗后ANA阳性率、抗ds—DNA阳性率、IgG、IgA、IgM、ESR下降(P〈0.05),而补体C3、C4无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。与对照组相比,DFPP组ANA和抗ds—DNA转阴率更高,IgG下降更明显(P〈0.05)。对照组与DFPP组治疗前后SLEDAI明显下降(P〈0.05),组问比较,DFPP组下降更显著(P〈0.05)。DFPP组疗效优于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论对于合并LN的重型SLE患者,在常规药物治疗的基础上,采用DFPP可显著缓解病情。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of double filtration plasmapheresis (DF- PP) in the treatment of severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) complicated with lupus nephritis (LN). Methods The clinical data of 36 cases of severe SLE in our hospital from Jan. 2004 to Dec. 2011 were ana- lyzeck The patients with SLE were divided into two groups.. DFPP treatment group and control group. Be- fore and after treatment, 24-h urinary protein, urea nitrogen, serum creatinine (SCr), cystatin C, albumin, immunoglobulin level, complement (23 and CA, autoantibodies (ANA and anti-dsDNA), erythrocyte sedi- mentation rate (ESR) and SLEDAI score were measured. Results 24-h urinary protein, urea nitrogen, Scr and cystatin C were significantly reduced after treatment as compared with those before treatment in both groups (P〈0.05), more significantly in DFPP treatment group than in control group (P〈0. 05). There was significant difference in autoantibodies positive rate (ANA and anti-dsDNA autoantibody), IgG, IgA, IgM, ESR, C3 and CA before and after treatment in control group (P〈0. 05). There was significant differ- ence in autoantibedies rate (ANA and anti-dsDNA autoantibody), IgG, IgA, IgM and ESR before and after treatment in DFPP treatment group (P〈0. 05). There was no significant difference in C3 and CA before and after treatment in DFPP treatment group (P〉0. 05). Negative conversion rate of ANA and anti-dsDNA was significantly higher in DFPP treatment group than in control group (P〈0. 05). IgG was decreased more sig- nificantly in DFPP treatment group (P〈0. 05). There was significant difference in SLEDAI before and after treatment in both groups (P〈0. 05). SLEDAI was decreased more significantly in DFPP treatment group(P〈0. 05). DFPP treatment group showed a greater improvement in therapeutic effects than control group (P〈0. 05). Conelmiom DFPP combined with hormone and immune depressant can improve the biochemical data and decrease the autoantibody. DFPP may have an important adjuvant role in therapeutic options in the treatment of severe SLE patients with LN complications.
出处 《临床肾脏病杂志》 2013年第7期304-307,共4页 Journal Of Clinical Nephrology
关键词 系统性红斑狼疮 狼疮肾炎 双重血浆滤过 Systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus nephritis Double filtration plasmapheresis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Appel GB, Cohen DJ, Pirani CL, et al. Long-term follow-up of pa- tients with lupus nephritis. A study based on the classification of the World Health Organization. Am J Med, 1987,83:877-885.
  • 2中华医学会风湿病学分会.系统性红斑狼疮诊断及治疗指南(草案)中华医学会风湿病学分会.中华风湿病学杂志,2003,7:508-513.
  • 3Markowitz GS, D'Agati VD. The ISN/RPS 2003 classification of lupus nephritis: An assessment at 3 years. Kidney Int, 2007,71 : 491-495.
  • 4Sprenger KB, Huber K,Kratz W, et al. Nomograms for the prediction of patient's plasma volume in plasma exchange therapy from height, weight, and hematocrit. J Clin Apher, 1987,3:185-190.
  • 5Bombardier C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, et al. Derivation of the SLEDAh A disease activity index for lupus patients. Arthritis Rheum, 1992,35 : 630-640.
  • 6Bao H,Liu ZH,Xie HL,et al. Successful treatment of class V + IV lupus nephritis with multitarget therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2008,19:2001-2010.
  • 7姚国乾,韩志武,肖琼,李靖,徐友平,沈俊.应用免疫吸附治疗重症系统性红斑狼疮的疗效观察[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2008,17(6):507-511. 被引量:12
  • 8Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Lan SP, et al. A controlled trial of plas- mapheresis therapy in severe lupus nephritis. The Lupus Nephri- tis Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med, 1992, 326: 1373- 1379.
  • 9杨晓,孙希锋.双重滤过血浆置换疗法[J].内科急危重症杂志,2006,12(1):39-39. 被引量:33
  • 10Clark WF, Rock GA, Buskard N, et al. Therapeutic plasma ex- change: An update from the Canadian Apheresis Group. Ann In- tern Med, 1999,131 :453-462.

二级参考文献20

  • 1季大玺,龚德华,任冰,徐斌,刘芸,张一丹,谢红浪,陶静,胡伟新,刘志红,黎磊石.免疫吸附的临床应用及疗效[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2004,13(5):408-413. 被引量:44
  • 2占锦峰,刘志红,李世军,王庆文,陈惠萍,曾彩虹,龚德华,季大玺,黎磊石.免疫吸附治疗脂蛋白肾病的疗效观察[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2006,15(3):203-209. 被引量:22
  • 3Bombardier C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, et al. Derivation of the SLEDAI: a disease activity index for lupus patients. Arthritis Rheum, 1992,35:630 - 640.
  • 4Mok CC, Wong RWS, Lau CS. Ovarian failure and flares of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum, 1999 ,42 : 1274- 1250.
  • 5Sprenger KBG, Huber K, Kratz W, et al. Nomograms for the prediction of patient's plasma volume in plasma exchange therapy from height, weight, and hematocrit. J Clin Apheresis, 1987, 3:185 190
  • 6Hershko AY, Naparstek Y. Removal of pathogenic autoantibodies by immunoadsorption. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2005,1051:635 -646.
  • 7Yokoyama H, Wada T, Furuichi K. Immunomodulation effects and clinical evidence of apheresis in renal diseases. Ther Apher Dial, 2003,7(6) :513 -519.
  • 8Sugimoto K, Yamaji K, Yang KS, et al. Immunoadsorption plasmapheresis using a phenylalanine column as an effective treatment for lupus nephritis. Ther Apher Dial, 2006,10 : 187 - 192.
  • 9Gaubitz M, Schneider KM. Immunoadsorption in systemic lupus erythematosus: different techniques and their current role in medical therapy. Ther Apher Dial, 2003,7 (2) : 183 - 188.
  • 10Belak M, Borberg H, Jimenez C, et al. Therapeutical and Clinical Experience with Protein A Immunoadsouption Columns. Transfus Sci, 1994,15:419 - 422.

共引文献43

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部