期刊文献+

衰减校正、空间位置及旋转半径对SPECT分辨力的影响 被引量:1

Impact of attenuation correction , position and radius of rotation on spatial resolution of SPECT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨SPECT断层成像图像空间分辨力及衰减校正、空间位置和旋转半径对SPECT分辨力的影响。方法采用Siemens Symbia T成像设备,选择平行孔低能高分辨准直器,在3种不同旋转半径下分别对椭圆柱分辨力模型行SPECT及CT成像。椭圆柱空间分辨力模型中,在长轴方向分布着5条与椭圆柱体轴平行的线源。以有序子集最大期望值法重建图像,对3种旋转半径下采集的图像分别进行有或无CT衰减校正重建。以半高宽(FWHM)表示所有重建图像的分辨力,分别对沿长半轴分布的5条线源计算6个层面上的FWHM。结果线源距视野中心越远,径向、切向的分辨力越好,切向差异更明显;分辨力随旋转半径增大而降低;衰减校正后FWHM略有降低。结论视野中的空间位置、旋转半径均对SPECT成像系统空间分辨力有所影响,CT衰减校正对图像空间分辨力的提高作用有限。 Objective To investigate the impact of CT attenuation correction, position in the field of view and the rotational radius on SPECT spatial resolution. Methods SPECT and CT imaging of an elliptical cylinder resolution phantom was performed using Siemens Symbia T equipment in 3 different rotational radius with parallel hole low-energy high-resolution collimator. In the long axis direction of the resolution model, there were 5 line sources parallel to long axis. The integrated-CT imaging was performed for attenuation correction. Acquisition conditions included 3 rotating orbit of detector with step and shoot mode. All 3 acquisitions were reconstructed using OSEM algorithm with or without CT attenuation correction. The resolution of line resource spread function was evaluated with the full width at half maximum (FWHM) value. All the reconstructed images were analyzed. Then the FWHM value of 5 line sources in 6 different transverse sections were calculated. Results The spatial resolution of tangential was the worst at center of the visual field, and the closer to the edge, the better the value, so did the resolution of radial direction, while the differences of tangential were greater. When the distance between detector and the phantom increased, the FWHM value increased,indicating that the resolution became poor. The results showed that CT attenuation correction could be improved by FWHM slightly, esp. in central region. Conclusion The position in the field of view and the radius of rotation have impact on the image spatial resolution. The impact of CT attenuation correction on spatial resolution of reconstructed images is limited.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期1384-1388,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 单光子 分辨力 衰减校正 旋转半径 Tomography emission-computed single-photon Resolution Attenuation correction Rotational radius
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Bitarafan A, Rajabi H. The effect of filtrating and reconstruction method on the left ventricular ejection fraction derived from GSPECT: A statistical comparison of angiography and echocar- diography. Ann Nucl Med, 2008,22(8):707-713.
  • 2耿建华,陈英茂,陈盛祖,郑容,张雯杰,田嘉禾.双探头SPECT符合线路衰减校正对图像分辨率及计数影响的模型研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(1):124-126. 被引量:7
  • 3耿建华,陈英茂,陈盛祖,司宏伟,张雯杰,郑容,田嘉禾.双探头符合成像系统的分辨率及其影响因素[J].核电子学与探测技术,2007,27(2):180-183. 被引量:3
  • 4Kunze WD, Bachre M, Richter E. PET with a dual-head coinci- dence camera: Spatial resolution, scatter fraction and sensitivity. J Nucl Med, 2000,41(6) :1067-1074.
  • 5耿建华,刘琳,郑容,贾莹莹,张雯杰,林琳,陈盛祖.扫描速度与计数对SPECT全身平面显像的影响[J].中国医学影像技术,2009,25(9):1689-1692. 被引量:4
  • 6陈英茂,耿建华,田嘉禾,尹大一,何义杰,陈盛祖.PET系统分辨力及影响因素的实验研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(5):778-780. 被引量:15
  • 7Brix G, Zaers J, Adam LE, et al. Performance evaluation of a whole body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. J Nucl Med, 1997,38(10) : 1614-1623.
  • 8DeGrado TR, Turkington TG, Williams J, et al. Performance characteristics of a whole body PET scanner. J Nucl Med, 1994, 35(8) : 1398-1406.
  • 9Patton JA, Turkington TG. SPECT/CT physical principles and attenuation correction. J Nucl Med Teehnol, 2008,36(1):1-10.
  • 10Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P, et al. Use of coronary calci- um score scans from stand-alone multislice computed tomo-.graphy for attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eurd NuclMedMolImaging, 2007,34(1) :11-19.

二级参考文献29

  • 1耿建华,陈英茂,陈盛祖,郑容,张雯杰,田嘉禾.双探头SPECT符合线路衰减校正对图像分辨率及计数影响的模型研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(1):124-126. 被引量:7
  • 2National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA).NEMA Standards Publication NU 1-2007:Performance Measurements of Gamma Cameras.USA:National Electrical Manufacturers Association,2007:36-37.
  • 3International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).International Standard:Radionuclide imaging devices-Characteristics and test conditions-Part 3:Gamma camera based-wholebody imaging system,IEC 61675-3.Geneva:International Electrotechnical Commission,1998:4-7.
  • 4国家质量监督检验检疫总局.中华人民共和国国家标准GB/T 18988.3-2003放射性核素成像设备性能试验规则第3部分:伽玛照相机全身成像系统.北京:中国标准出版社,2003:1-4.
  • 5[2]Brix G,Zaers J,Adam LE,et al.Performance evaluation of a whole body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol[J].J Nucl Med,1997,38(10):1614-1623.
  • 6[3]Tarantola G,Zito F,Gerundini P.PET instrumentation and reconstruction algorithms in whole-body applications[J].J Nucl Med,2003,44(5):756-769.
  • 7[4]Wienhard K,Eriksson L,Grootoonk S,et al.Performance evaluation of the positron scanner ECAT EXACT[J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,1992,16(5):804-813.
  • 8[5]DeGrado TR,Turkington TG,Williams J,et al.Performance characteristics of a whole body PET scanner[J].J Nucl Med,1994,35(8):1398-1406.
  • 9Yutani K, Tatsumi M, Eiichi S, et al. Comparison of dual-head coincidence gamma camera FDG imaging with FDG PET in detecting of breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis[J]. J Nucl Med, 1999,40(6):1003-1008.
  • 10Bleckmann C, Dose J, Bohuslavizki KH, et al. Effect of attenuation correction on lesion detectability in FDG PET of breast cancer[J]. J Nucl Med,1999,40(12):2021-2024.

共引文献20

同被引文献12

  • 1Knoll P, Kotalova D, KOchle G, et al. Comparison of advanced iterative reconstruction methods for SPECT/CT. Med Phys, 2012,22(1) : 58-69.
  • 2Livieratos L, Mohan H, Gnanasegaran G, et al. Comparison of 10 versus 20 min SPECT 99mTc-MDP bone scans: Use of 3D-OS EM image reconstruction with distance-dependent resolution rood eling. Nucl Med Commun, 2010,31(12) : 1045-1053.
  • 3Lyra M, Ploussi A. Filtering in SPECT image reconstruction. Int J Biomed Imaging, 2011:693795.
  • 4Seret A, Forthomme J. Comparison of different types of commer eia| filtered back projection and ordered-subset expectation maxi mization SPECT reconstruction software. J Nucl Med Technol 2009,37(3):179 187.
  • 5Bitarafan A, Rajahi H. The effect of filtrating and reconstruction method on the left ventricular ejection fraction derived from GSPECT: A statistical comparison of angiography and echocar- diography. Ann Nucl Med, 2008,22(8):707-713.
  • 6Beekman FJ, S[iipen ET, Niessen WJ. Selection of task-depend- ent diffusion filters for the post-processing of SPECT images. PhysMedBiol, 1998,43(6):1713-1730. ".
  • 7R6mer W, Reichel N, Wija HA, et al. Isotropic reconstruction of SPECT data Using OSEM3D: Correlation with CT. Acad Radiol, 2006,13(4) : 496-502.
  • 8Ceriani L, Ruberto T, Delaloye AB, et al. Three-dimensional or- dered subset expectation maximization iterative protocol for evalu- ation of left ventricular volumes and function by quantitative gated SPECT: A dynamic phantom study. J Nucl Med Technol, 2010, 38(1) :18-23.
  • 9Leong LK, Kruger RL, O'Connor MK. A comparison of the uni formity requirements for SPECT image reconstruction using FBP and OSEM techniques. J Nuel Med Teehnol, 2001,29 (2) : 79- 83.
  • 10Duarte DD, Monteiro MS, El Hakmaoui F, et al. Influence of reconstruction parameters during filtered back projection and or-dered-subset expectation maximization in lhe measurement of lhe left-ventricular w)lumes and function during gated SPECT. J Nucl Med Technol, 2012,4{)(1) :29 36.

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部