期刊文献+

惊恐障碍严重度量表和惊恐相关症状量表(中文版)的信度和效度 被引量:9

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Panic Disorder Severity Scale and Panic-Associated Symptom Scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的检验中文版医生用惊恐障碍严重度量表(PDSS)和患者用惊恐障碍严重度量表(PDSS—SR)及中文版惊恐相关症状量表(PASS)的信度和效度,提供中国惊恐发作患者的PDSS和PASS评分参照值。方法为多中心横断面设计;分别于基线、3—5d、4周时和6周时,对126例符合《美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第4版)》惊恐障碍诊断标准的中度以上成年患者进行PDSS、PDSS—SR和PASS测评,同时测定汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD17)、临床总体印象严重度指数(CGI—S)、焦虑状态特质量表(STAI)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)。结果PDSS基线平均(16.48±4.02)分,Cronbach’s α系数0.74,重测一致性0.70~0.89,与HAMA和CGI-S有显著意义的相关(相关系数分别为0.35,0.46;P均〈0.01);含2个因子。PDSS—SR基线平均(15.63±4.45)分,与PDSS他评总分的相关系数为0.78。PASS基线平均(14.17±4.19)分,量表内部一致性Cronbach’s α系数0.72,重测一致性0.64—0.77,与PDSS和PDSS—SR的相关系数分别为0.68和0.60。结论PDSS、PDSS—SR和PASS有较好的信度和效度,适合用于惊恐障碍临床严重程度的监测。 Objective To exam the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) and its self-report version (PDSS-SR) , and the Panic-Associated Symptom Scale (PASS). Methods The adult patients with moderate or severe panic disorder were collected from 13 centers in China. The PDSS, PDSS-SR and PASS were administered together with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA),Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMDI7), Clinical Global Impression Severity Index ( CGI-S), State-Trait Anxiety Invetory (STAI) and Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) at baseline and 3 -5 days, 4 weeks, 6 weeks from baseline. Results A total of 126 patients recruited in the study had a PDSS mean score of (16.48 ± 4. 02) at baseline. Measures of internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0. 74) and reliability ( test-retest ICC = 0. 70 - 0. 89 ) were acceptable. The PDSS score correlated with HAMA total scores and CGI score ( r = 0. 35 and 0. 46, respectively, P 〈 0. 01 ). Factor analysis yielded a 2-factor solution accounting for 57.3% of the variance, one containing the panic and functional impariment (items 1 -3 and 6 -7 ) and the second containing avoidence (items 4 and 5 ). PDSS-SR has a mean score of ( 15.63 ±4. 45) at baseline with the Pearson correlation coefficient of 0. 78 with PDSS score. PASS had a baseline mean score of (14. 17 ± 4. 19) and also acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0. 72) and reliability (test-retest ICC = 0. 64 - 0. 77 ). Its Pearson correlation coefficients with PDSS score and PDSS-SR score were 0. 68 and 0. 60 respectively. Conclusions The PDSS, PDSS-SR and PASS have moderate to good reliability and validity. They are good for monitoring the clinical severity of patients with panic disorder.
出处 《中华精神科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期217-222,共6页 Chinese Journal of Psychiatry
关键词 惊恐 惊恐病 可重复性 结果 评定量表 Panic Panic disorder Reproducibility of results Rating scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Shear MK, Brown TA, Barlow DH,et al. Multicenter collaborative panic disorder severity scale. Am J Psychiatry, 1997,154:1571-1575.
  • 2Argyle N, Deltito J, Allerup P, et al. The Panic-Associated Symptom Scale: measuring the severity of panic disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 1991,83:20-26.
  • 3Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al. The Mini- International Neuropsychiatric Interview ( M. I. N. I. ) : the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry, 1998,59 Suppl 20:22-33.
  • 4Shear MK, Rucci P, Williams J,et al. Reliability and validity of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale: replication and extension. J Psychiatr Res, 2001,35 : 293 -296.
  • 5Houck PR, Spiegel DA, Shear MK,et al. Reliability of the self- report version of the panic disorder severity scale. Depress Anxiety ,2002,15 : 183-185.
  • 6张海音,张鸿燕,赵靖平,马崔,李鸣,陶明,徐文璇,张明园.帕罗西汀和氯丙咪嗪治疗惊恐障碍——随机双盲平行对照研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2000,14(6):410-413. 被引量:10
  • 7Leerubier Y, Sheehan DV, Weiller E, et al. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry, 1997, 12: 224-231.
  • 8Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Harnett-Sheehan K, et al. The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability. Eur Psychiatry, 1997, 12:232-241.
  • 9Lira YJ, Yu BH, Kim JH. Korean panic disorder severity scale: construct validity by confirmatory factor analysis. Depress Anxiety, 2007.24:95-102.
  • 10熊红芳,李占江,韩海英,徐子燕,郭志华,姚淑敏,郭萌,姜长青.惊恐障碍严重程度量表中文版的信效度研究[J].中华精神科杂志,2012,45(5):285-288. 被引量:19

二级参考文献15

  • 1Kessler R C,Arch Gen Psychiatry,1994年,51卷,8页
  • 2Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Jin R, et al. The epidemiology of panic attacks, panic disorder, and agoraphobia in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006,63 : 415-424.
  • 3Goodwin RD, Hamilton SP. The early-onset fearful panic attack as a predictor of severe psychopathology. Psychiatry Res, 2002,109 : 71-79.
  • 4Leon AC, Portera L, Weissman MM. The social costs of anxiety disorders. Br J Psychiatry Suppl,1995 (27) :19-22.
  • 5Deacon B, Lickel J, Abramowitz JS. Medical utilization across the anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord,2008,22:344-350.
  • 6Shear MK, Brown TA, Barlow DH, et al. Muhicenter collaborative panic disorder severity scale. Am J Psychiatry, 1997,154: 1571- 1575.
  • 7Shear MK, Rucci P, Williams J, et al. Reliability and validity of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale: replication and extension. J Psychiatr Res,2001,35 :293-296.
  • 8Monkul ES, Tural U, Onur E, et al. Panic Disorder Severity Scale: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Depress Anxiety, 2004,20 : 8 - 16.
  • 9Yamamoto I, Nakano Y, Watanabe N, et al. Cross-cultural evaluation of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale in Japan. Depress Anxiety ,2004,20 : 17-22.
  • 10Lim YJ, Yu BH, Kim JH. Korean panic disorder severity scale: construct validity by confinmatory factor analysis. Depress Anxiety, 2007,24:95-102.

共引文献27

同被引文献97

引证文献9

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部