摘要
目的检验中文版医生用惊恐障碍严重度量表(PDSS)和患者用惊恐障碍严重度量表(PDSS—SR)及中文版惊恐相关症状量表(PASS)的信度和效度,提供中国惊恐发作患者的PDSS和PASS评分参照值。方法为多中心横断面设计;分别于基线、3—5d、4周时和6周时,对126例符合《美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第4版)》惊恐障碍诊断标准的中度以上成年患者进行PDSS、PDSS—SR和PASS测评,同时测定汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD17)、临床总体印象严重度指数(CGI—S)、焦虑状态特质量表(STAI)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)。结果PDSS基线平均(16.48±4.02)分,Cronbach’s α系数0.74,重测一致性0.70~0.89,与HAMA和CGI-S有显著意义的相关(相关系数分别为0.35,0.46;P均〈0.01);含2个因子。PDSS—SR基线平均(15.63±4.45)分,与PDSS他评总分的相关系数为0.78。PASS基线平均(14.17±4.19)分,量表内部一致性Cronbach’s α系数0.72,重测一致性0.64—0.77,与PDSS和PDSS—SR的相关系数分别为0.68和0.60。结论PDSS、PDSS—SR和PASS有较好的信度和效度,适合用于惊恐障碍临床严重程度的监测。
Objective To exam the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) and its self-report version (PDSS-SR) , and the Panic-Associated Symptom Scale (PASS). Methods The adult patients with moderate or severe panic disorder were collected from 13 centers in China. The PDSS, PDSS-SR and PASS were administered together with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA),Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMDI7), Clinical Global Impression Severity Index ( CGI-S), State-Trait Anxiety Invetory (STAI) and Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) at baseline and 3 -5 days, 4 weeks, 6 weeks from baseline. Results A total of 126 patients recruited in the study had a PDSS mean score of (16.48 ± 4. 02) at baseline. Measures of internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0. 74) and reliability ( test-retest ICC = 0. 70 - 0. 89 ) were acceptable. The PDSS score correlated with HAMA total scores and CGI score ( r = 0. 35 and 0. 46, respectively, P 〈 0. 01 ). Factor analysis yielded a 2-factor solution accounting for 57.3% of the variance, one containing the panic and functional impariment (items 1 -3 and 6 -7 ) and the second containing avoidence (items 4 and 5 ). PDSS-SR has a mean score of ( 15.63 ±4. 45) at baseline with the Pearson correlation coefficient of 0. 78 with PDSS score. PASS had a baseline mean score of (14. 17 ± 4. 19) and also acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0. 72) and reliability (test-retest ICC = 0. 64 - 0. 77 ). Its Pearson correlation coefficients with PDSS score and PDSS-SR score were 0. 68 and 0. 60 respectively. Conclusions The PDSS, PDSS-SR and PASS have moderate to good reliability and validity. They are good for monitoring the clinical severity of patients with panic disorder.
出处
《中华精神科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第4期217-222,共6页
Chinese Journal of Psychiatry
关键词
惊恐
惊恐病
可重复性
结果
评定量表
Panic
Panic disorder
Reproducibility of results
Rating scale