期刊文献+

应用溶蚀器/后置膜系统分析上海大气PM_(2.5)中水溶性离子的组成及采样误差 被引量:8

Concentrations and sampling artifacts of water-soluble ions in PM_(2.5) in Shanghai sampled using denuder/backup-filter system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用溶蚀器/后置膜采样系统分析了上海市PM2.5中主要水溶性离子(SO4^2-、NO3^-、NH4^-、Cl^-)以及大气中NH3、HNO3和HCl的浓度。结果表明,上海PM2.5中SO4^2-、NO3^-和NH4^+的总浓度为21.55±16.43μg/m^3,其中SO24-是含量最高的水溶性离子,但冬季时NO-3/SO24-比值常大于1,说明流动源已成为上海PM2.5主要的污染源;与溶蚀器/后置膜采样方法相比,常规Teflon膜采样中Cl^-、NO3^-、NH4^+在夏秋季时存在负误差,而冬季时存在正误差,SO24-在不同季节均出现正误差;冬季常规膜采样造成的误差相对较小;采样期间大气中NH3、HNO3和HCl的浓度范围分别为1.56-20.84μg/m^3、0.26-2.80μg/m^3和0.15-1.62μg/m^3,HNO3和HCl浓度具有显著的夏高冬低的季节变化。 Denuder/backup-filter sampling system was used to measure the water-soluble ions (SO4^2-, NO3^- , NH4^+ and Cl^- ) in PM2.5, acidic gases and ammonia in the atmosphere in Shanghai. Total concentration of SO4^2-, NO3^- and NH4^+ in PM2.5 during the sampling periods was high at (21±16) μg/m^3. The high NO3/SO24 ratio in winter (〉1) suggested that vehicle emission was the major contributor to PM2.5 in Shanghai. Comparing with the denuder/backup-filter system, normal sampling with Teflon filter suffered significant negative sampling artifacts for Cl^- , NO3^- and NH4^+ in summer and autumn, while moderate positive artifacts in winter. SO24 had positive sampling artifacts of about 8% in all the sampling periods when collected with normal sampler. Gaseous NH3, HNO3 and HC1 with concentrations of 1.56-20.84 μg/m^3, 0.26-2.80 μg/m^3 and 0.15-1.62 μg/m^3, respectively, were detected in the atmosphere in Shanghai. HNO3 and HCl had obviously higher concentrations in summer/autumn than those in winter.
出处 《地球化学》 CAS CSCD 2013年第3期197-204,共8页 Geochimica
基金 国家自然科学基金(20877052 41173097)
关键词 PM2 5 水溶性离子 采样误差 上海 PM2.5 water-soluble ions sampling artifacts ammonia Shanghai
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Pope III C A, Burnett R T, Thun M J, Calle E E, Krewski D, Ito K, Thurston G D. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution[J]. J Am Med Assoc, 2002, 287(9): 1132-1141.
  • 2Sloane C S, Watson J G, Chow J, Pritchett L, Richards L W. Size-segregated fine Particle measurements by chemical spe?cies and their impact on visibility impairment in Denver[J]. Atmos Environ, 1991,25(5/6): 1013-1024.
  • 3宋玉芝,秦伯强,杨龙元,胡维平,罗潋葱.大气湿沉降向太湖水生生态系统输送氮的初步估算[J].湖泊科学,2005,17(3):226-230. 被引量:67
  • 4Trebs I, Meixner F X, Slanina J, Otjes R, Jongejan P, Andreae M o. Real-time measurements of ammonia, acidic trace gases and water-soluble inorganic aerosol species at a rural site in the Amazon Basin[J]. Atmos Chern Phys, 2004, 4: 967-987.
  • 5Yao X H, Shairsingh K, Lam P H, Evans G J. Underestimation of sulfate concentration in PM2.5 using a semi-continuous par?ticle instrument based on ion chromatography[J]. J Environ Monit, 2009, 11(6): 1292-1297.
  • 6Pathak R K, Yao X H, Chan C K. Sampling artifacts of acidity and ionic species in PM2.5[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2004, 38(1): 254-259.
  • 7USEPA, Determination of strong acidity of atmospheric fine-particles ?2.5 urn) using annular denuder technology[R]. EPA Report No. EPA/600/R-93/037; Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory: Washington, DC, 1992.
  • 8Ye B M, Ji X L, Yang H Z, Yao X H, Chan C K, Cadle S H, Chan T, Mulawa P A. Concentration and chemical composi?tion of PM2S in Shanghai for a I-year period[J]. Atmos Envi?ron, 2003, 37(4): 499-510.
  • 9Wang Y, Zhuang G S, Zhang X Y, Huang K, Xu C, Tang A H, Chen J M, An Z S. The ion chemistry, seasonal cycle, and sources of PM2.S and TSP aerosol in Shanghai[J]. Atmos En?viron, 2006, 40(16): 2935-2952.
  • 10Ziemba L D, Fischer E, Griffin R J, Talbot R W. Aerosol acid?ity in rural New England: Temporal trends and source region analysis[J]. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112, DIOS22, doi: 10.102912006JD007605.

二级参考文献7

共引文献66

同被引文献118

引证文献8

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部