摘要
法律解释方法的排序由于缺乏一个元规则而颇受非议。对这些异议的回应迫使我们检讨影响法律解释方法位序的种种因素,并进而探寻隐藏在解释方法位序表背后的元规则。研究表明,可接受性的元规则可以作为法律解释方法排序的始基,并在法律解释中担当起类似法学研究逻辑起点的各项功能。
The order of legal interpretation methods is controversial because of lack of a meta-rule, the response to which forces us to review various factors influencing the order of legal interpretation methods, and further explore the metal-rule behind an order table of legal explanation methods. The research shows that the meta-rule of acceptability can serve as a sorting archer of legal interpretation method, which can undertake all kinds of functions similar to jurisprudential logic starting
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
2013年第4期83-88,共6页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
作者参与的教育部人文社科规划基金项目"民意沟通与司法调审制度改革研究"(10YJA820128)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
法律解释方法
位序表
元规则
可接受性
legal interpretation point in legal interpretation. method
order table
meta-rule
acceptability