期刊文献+

Coflex棘突间动态稳定系统治疗青壮年单节段腰椎间盘突出症的临床观察 被引量:1

The clinical observation of Coflex interspinous dynamic stabilization system on treatment of mono-segment prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc in young adults
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Coflex棘突间动态稳定系统在青壮年单节段腰椎间盘突出症的应用趋向。方法回顾性分析2009年8月~2012年4月采用Coflex内固定手术治疗18例青壮年单节段腰椎间盘突出症的临床资料,通过记录手术时间、出血量、JOA评分、VAS评分,评价手术疗效,随访其有无动态稳定系统相关并发症。结果术后3d、1个月VAS评分及术后1、3、6个月JOA评分与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后随访JOA评分改善率为100%,无感染、脑脊液漏、神经损伤、植入物移位等并发症。结论 Coflex棘突动态稳定系统治疗腰椎间盘突出,创伤小,手术时间短,术后能早期下地活动,初期疗效良好,是治疗青壮年腰椎间盘突出症的好方法。 Objective To explore the application tendency of Coflex interspinous dynamic and stable system of treatment on mono-segment prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc in young adults.Methods 18 young adults with monosegment prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc treated by Coflex internal fixation from August 2009 to April 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.The surgical effects were evaluated by operation time,blood loss,JOA score,VAS score,and whether there were complications related with dynamic stabilization system was collected by follow-up.Results The VAS score 3 days and 1 month after surgery and JOA score 1,3,6 months after surgery were statistical difference compared with before surgery(P&lt;0.05).The post-operation follow-up displayed improvement of JOA score in 100% and had no complications such as infection,leakage of cerebrospinal fluid,nerve injury,and shift of the implant.Conclusion The treatment of mono-segment prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc with Coflex interspinous dynamic stabilization system has the advantages of little wound,short operation time,being out of bed at early time after surgery,obtains a good effect at an early stage.It is a satisfactory way to treat mono-segment prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc in young adults.
出处 《中国当代医药》 2013年第23期73-74,76,共3页 China Modern Medicine
基金 广东省东莞市科技计划医疗卫生类科研项目(201210515013183)
关键词 腰椎间盘突出症 手术 Coflex棘突间动态稳定系统 Prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc Surgery Coflex interspinous dynamic stabilization system
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Christie SD,Song JK,Fessler RG.Dynamic interspinous process tech- nology[J].Spine, 2005,30 ( i6 Suppl ) : $73-78.
  • 2Bono CM,Vaccaro AR.Inter spinous process devices in the lumbar spine[J].Spinal Disord Tech, 2007,20 (2) : 255-261.
  • 3Seitsalo S,Schlenzka D,Poussa M,et al.Disc degeneration in young patients with isthmic spondy lolisthesis treated operatively or conser-vatively:a longterm follow-up[J].Eur Spine J, 1997,6 (6):393-397.
  • 4Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY,et al.The effects of an interspinous implanton intervertebral discpressures[J].Spine, 2003,28 ( 1 ) : 26-32.
  • 5Kong DS,Kim ES,Eoh W.One-year outcome evaluation after inter- spinous implantation for degener ative spinal stenosis with segmental instability[J].J Korean Med Sci, 2007,22 (2) : 330-335.
  • 6Tsai KJ,Murakami H,Lowery GL,et al.A biomechanical evaluation of an inter spinous device(Coflex)used to stabilize the lumbar spine[J].Surg Orthop Adv,2006,15(3 ) : 167-172.
  • 7Sengupta DK.Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low baekpain[J].Orthop Clin North Am, 2004,35 ( 1 ) : 43-56.
  • 8Rudolf B.Coflex inter spinous implant:motion preservation treatment inlumbar degenerative stenosis patients minimum 1 year results[J].Spine, 2006,6(5) : 143.
  • 9关凯,孙天胜,李放,时述山.动态固定及其在腰椎退行性疾病中的应用现状[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(9):709-711. 被引量:9
  • 10Alini M ,Rougley PJ ,Antoniov J.A biological approach to treating disc degeneration:not for to day,but may be for tomorrow [J].Eur Spine J, 2002,11 (suppl 2) :5215-220.

二级参考文献29

  • 1Gibson JN, Grant IC, Waddell G. The eochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis[J].Spine, 1999,24 ( 17 ) : 1820-1832.
  • 2McNally DS. The objectives for the mechanical evaluation of spinal instrumentation have changed [J].Eur Spine J,2002,11(Suppl 2) : 179-185.
  • 3Mulholland RC,Sengupta DK. Rationale,principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization[J].Eur Spine J, 2002,11 (Suppl 2) : 198-205.
  • 4Seitsalo S,Schlenzka D,Poussa M,et al. Disc degeneration in young patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis treated operatively or conservatively:a long-term follow-up [J].Eur Spine J,1997,6(6):393-397.
  • 5Fujiwara A,Lim TH,An HS,et al. The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine[J].Spine,2000,25(23):3036-3044.
  • 6Korovessis P,Papazisis Z,Koureas G,et al.Rigid,semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis:correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term resuhs[J].Spine,2004,29(7) :735-742.
  • 7Ghiselli G,Wang JC,Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment de generation in the lumbar spine [J].J Bone Joint Surg (Am),2004,86(7 ) : 1497-1503.
  • 8Kumar MN,Baklanov A,Chopin D.Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar fusion[J].Eur Spine J,2001,10(4):314-319.
  • 9Guigui P,Lambert P, Lassale B, et al. Long-term outcome at adjacent levels of lumbar arthrodesis [J].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 1997,83(8) :685-693.
  • 10Detwiler PW,Marciano FF,Porter RW,et al.Lumbar stenosis:indications for fusion with and without instrumentation [J].Neurosurg Focus, 1997,3(2) :e4.

共引文献8

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部