期刊文献+

文化认知对话语隐喻的连贯性压力——一项基于China Daily的话语隐喻研究

Pressure of Cultural Cognition on Discourse Metaphors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Kvecses关于隐喻的"连贯性压力"研究强调话题、交际情境、物理环境、常规概念化方式对自然语篇中隐喻使用的解释作用,而作为语境与话语之间中介的话语生产者在很大程度上被理想化。文章主张,基于使用的隐喻研究具有释义学性质,即对隐喻使用的解释需要结合话语生产者存在的社会文化处境。基于身体、语言与认知的社会文化属性来探讨隐喻使用是认知社会语言学研究的重要课题。在认知社会语言学视角下,话语生产者是在语言与认知互动中形成共同体的社会成员;话语中的隐喻使用受到基于文化认知的连贯性压力而具有文化特殊性和变异性。 Kovecses investigates the impact of subject matter, communicative situation, physical environment as well as the conventionalized pattern of conceptualization on metaphor usage in natural discourses in terms of "pressure of coherence". This perspective has a defect in that it idealizes the discourse maker as the interface between the contextual factors and the discourse. In contrast, this article approaches metaphor use with enlightenment from hermeneuties, which requires a recognition of the socio-cultural situatedness of body, language and cognition, and, from a Cognitive Soeiolinguistic perspective, observes the specific pattern and variation of metaphor usage as the result of the "pressure of coherence" up from shared cultural cognition.
作者 周红英
出处 《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第3期27-34,56,共9页 Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 隐喻 连贯性压力 社会文化处境 认知社会语言学 文化认知 pressure of coherence socio-cuhural situatedness Cognitive Sociolinguistics cultural cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Kovecses, Z. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Varia- tion [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press, 2005.
  • 2Kovecses, Z. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction [M]. Ox- ford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • 3Bemadez, E. Collective cognition and individual activity: variation, language and culture [A]. In Frank, R. M., Dirven, R., Ziemke, T., Bemardez, E. & Body, M. de (eds.). Body, Language and Mind: Sociocultural Situatedness [C]. Berlin / New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2008: 137-169.
  • 4Zlatev, J. Holistic spatial semantics of Thai [A]. In Casad, E. H. and Palmer, G.B. (eds.). Cognitive Linguistics and Non-Indo-European Languages [C]. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003:305 - 336.
  • 5Morgan, P. S. Competition, cooperation, and interconnection: metaphor families and social systems [A]. In Kristiansen, G. & Dirven, R. (eds.). Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems [C]. Berlin/New: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008:482-516.
  • 6van Dijk, T. A. Discourse and society: a new research jour- nal focus [J]. Discourse and Society, 1990, ( 1 ) : 5-16.
  • 7van Dijk, T. A. Society and Discourse [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  • 8Sharifian, F. Cultural models of Home in Aboriginal chil- dren' s English [A]. In Kristiansen, G. & Dirven, R. (eds.). Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems [C]. Berlin/New: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008: 333-352.
  • 9Gadamer, H. Truth and Method [M]. London and New York: Continuum, 1989.
  • 10Fairclough, N. Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research [A]. In Wodak , R. & Chilton, P. (eds.). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1992 : 53-70.

二级参考文献5

共引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部