期刊文献+

马修·阿诺德文化观的双重性——读《文化与无政府状态》

The Duality of Arnoldian Culture: Reading Culture and Anarchy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《文化与无政府状态:政治与社会批评》是马修.阿诺德的重要著作之一,也是阿诺德文化观的集中阐述,对西方文化研究和文学批评产生了深远影响。把握阿诺德文化观的关键是理解和平衡阿诺德文化观的双重性,即理论上的理想色彩和社会实践性、文化的精英意识和文化大众化、文化的普遍性和文化局限性。只有理解了这三个层面的双重性才能更好地关注阿诺德文化观所体现出的思想价值及其对当下中国的现实意义。 As one of important works of Matthew Arnold, Culture and Anarchy, an Essay in political and social criticism, is the elaboration of Amoldian culture and has had a far-reaching influence on western cultural study and literary criticism. The key to mastering Arnoldian culture is to understand and balance its duality, that is, its theoretical idealism and social practicalness, its elitism and popularity, its universality and its limitation. Only when we understand the duality on these three levels, can we appreciate the value and practical significance of Amoldian culture.
作者 汪小英
出处 《临沂大学学报》 2013年第4期81-84,共4页 Journal of Linyi University
关键词 阿诺德文化观 双重性 现实意义 Amoldian culture duality practical significance
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1马修·阿诺德.文化与无政府状态:政治与社会批评(韩敏中译)[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2008.
  • 2Lesley Johnson.The Critics:from Matthew Arnold to Raymond Williams [M].London:Routledge&Kegan Paul, 1979.28.
  • 3Lionel Trilling.Matthew Arnold [M].New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1979.252.
  • 4殷企平,余华.阿诺德文化观中的核心[A].英美文学研究论丛[C].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2007.206-218.
  • 5张宁.阿诺德精英主义文化观的意识形态幻象[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,39(1):14-18. 被引量:2
  • 6Eagleton,Terry.Literary theory:An Introduction [M]. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 2008.21.

二级参考文献9

  • 1特雷,伊格尔顿.二十世纪西方文学理论[M].伍晓明,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007:143.
  • 2Arnold,M.Culture and Anarchy and Other Writings[M].Ed.Collins.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993.
  • 3Arnold,M.Essays in Criticism:Third Series[M].New York:Cornell University Library,2009.
  • 4Carroll,J.The Cultural Theory of Matthew Arnold[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,1982.
  • 5单世联.绅士们的文化批判.花城,2000,(5).
  • 6Ramond Williams.Marxism and Literature[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1977.
  • 7Terry Eagleton.Criticism and Ideology[M].London:Verso Edition,1976.
  • 8Leavis.F.R“.Mass Civilization and Minonty Culture”,Education and the University[M].New York:Harcourt,Brace&Company,1929.
  • 9尧育飞.阿诺德的矛盾[J].读书,2009(12):86-88. 被引量:1

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部