期刊文献+

宫颈癌转移性淋巴结的CT影像学特点 被引量:9

CT image characteristics of metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨多层螺旋CT(MSCT)应用于宫颈癌淋巴结转移术前诊断的最佳形态学标准。方法纳入2009年1月~2012年8月于眉山市人民医院妇产科住院的原发宫颈癌患者100例。使用64排MSCT行全盆腔增强扫描测量患者局域淋巴结的最大短轴、最大长轴以及轴径比(最大短轴/最大长轴)。采用不同形态学标准进行MSCT术前N分期,并与术后病理分期比较,分析各形态学标准的诊断价值。结果转移性和非转移性淋巴结在影像学特点上没有统计学差异。采用短轴直径6 mm的ROC曲线面积大于其长度,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);采用轴径比=0.9的ROC曲线面积大于其长度,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。以最大短轴≥6 mm诊断为转移性淋巴结时,敏感度为63.6%,特异度为66.7%,准确度为65.0%,阳性预测值为70.0%,阴性预测值为62.3%;以轴径比=0.9为分界点时,敏感度为16.5%,特异度为79.8%,准确度为41.0%,阳性预测值为57.6%,阴性预测值为36.6%。结论推荐短轴≥6 mm作为转移性淋巴结的最佳诊断标准,并可结合轴径比(0.9)对转移性淋巴结肿大进行鉴别诊断以提高特异度。 Objective To investigate the most optimal morphological criteria of metastatic lymph node in cervical can cer.Methods 100 patients with cervical carcinoma were enrolled from January 2009 to August 2012 in People's Hos pital of Meishan City.The abdomen of patients were scanned by 64-multi-slice spiral computer tomography preopera tively,and the maximal long-axis diameter,maximal short-axis diameter,axial ratio were measured.Different morpho logic criterion were used to diagnose the metastatic lymph nodes.Results The difference of image characteristics between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes were not statistically significant.The AUC of 6 mm diameter(short axis) and axial ratio(0.9) were significantly bigger than the lengths,respectively(P〈0.05).The cut-off value of lymph nodes diameter for diagnosing metastasis was 6 mm(short axis),with the sensitivity of 63.6%,specificity of 66.7%,ac curacy of 65.0%,positive predictive value(PPV) of 70.0%,negative predictive value(NPV) of 62.3%,respectively.Meanwhile,the cut-off of axial ratio was 0.9,with the sensitivity of 16.5%,specificity of 79.8%,accuracy of 41.0%,PPV of 57.6%,NPV of 36.6%,respectively.Conclusion Short axis diameter of lymph node ≥ 6 mm,combined with axis ratio(0.9),may be the good diagnostic criterion for lymphatic metastasis.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2013年第24期111-113,共3页 China Medical Herald
基金 四川省眉山市科技计划项目(编号100300)
关键词 宫颈癌 多层螺旋CT 术前分期 淋巴结转移 形态学标准 Cervical cancer Multi-slice spiral computer tomography Preoperative staging Lymphatic metastasis Morphologic criteria
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Hricak H,Gatsonis C,Coakley FV,et al. Early invasive cervical can- cer:CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation-ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver vari- ability [J]. Radiology, 2007,245 (2) :491-498.
  • 2Yang WT,Lam WW,Yu MY,et al. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2000,175(3):759-766.
  • 3Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Roed H, et al. The diagnostic value of PET/CT scanning in patients with cervical eancer:a prospective study [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2007,106 ( 1 ) : 29-34.
  • 4Choi HJ,Kim SH,Seo SS,et al. MRI for pretreatment lymph node staging in uterine cervical cancer [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2006, 187(5) :538-543.
  • 5b Pecorelli S,Zigliani L,Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcino- ma of the cervix [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2009,105(2) : 107-108.
  • 6Edge SB ,Byrd DR,Compton CC ,et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th ed [M]. New York :Sl~ringer,2010.
  • 7Hricak H,Gatsonis C,Chi DS,et al. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer:results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gyne- cologic Oncology Group 183 [J]. J Clin 0ncol,2005,23 (36):9329" 9337.
  • 8National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinlcalpractice guidelines in cervical cancer,v.2.2013 [M]. Available at:http://www. nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf.
  • 9Kjaer SK,Frederiksen K,Munk C,et al. Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection:role of persistence [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2010,102(19) 11478-1488.
  • 10Dahlstri~m LA,Y|italo N,Sundstr~m K,et al. Prospective study of human papillomavirus and risk of cervical adenocarcinoma [J]. Int J Cancer, 2010,127 ( 8 ) : 1923-1930.

同被引文献64

  • 1杨志浩,高剑波,陈奎生,郭华.螺旋CT诊断胃癌淋巴结转移的价值[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2009,44(6):1248-1250. 被引量:10
  • 2冯淑瑜,张彦娜,刘建刚.宫颈癌淋巴结转移的高危因素及预后分析[J].癌症,2005,24(10):1261-1266. 被引量:71
  • 3Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer inci- dence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic re- gions of the world[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(14): 2137-2150.
  • 4Arbyn M, Antoine J, Valerianova Z, et al. Trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Ronlania[J]. Tumori, 2010, 96(4): 517-523.
  • 5Tsili AC, Tsangou V, Koliopoulos G, et al. Early-stage cervical carcinoma: the role of muhidetector CT in correlation with histopathological findings[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2013, 33(8): 882-887.
  • 6Hosaka M, Watari H, Mitamura T, et al. Survival and prognosti- cators of node-positive cervical cancer patients treated with radi- cal hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy [J]. lnt J Clin Oncol, 2011, 16(1): 33-38.
  • 7Torabi M, Aquino SL, Harisinghani MG. Current concepts in lymph node imaging[J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45(9): 1509-1518.
  • 8Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY, et al. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma[J]. AJR, 2000, 175(3): 759-766.
  • 9Sakuragi N. Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2007, 12(3): 165-175.
  • 10李相生,周纯武,戴景蕊,赵心明,蒋力明.多层螺旋CT诊断宫颈癌淋巴结转移的价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2008,16(1):61-63. 被引量:35

引证文献9

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部