期刊文献+

基于后现代课程观的高校人文社会学科自传式课程解读与教学改革——以“中外教育史”为例 被引量:1

Autobiography Curriculum Interpretation and Teaching Reform based on Post-modernism of Humanities and Social Sciences of College and University——Taking the History of Education as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于后现代课程观的高校人文社会学科自传式课程解读与教学,是受后现代课程观与自传式课程理论启示所提出的课程内容拓展与教学方法改革,主要倡导以下理念:人文社会学科的某些"知识"是相对的历史的,可在适当范围内对其进行演绎与引申;课程内容解读是多元的个性的,应将其与现实生活结合起来;师生自传式反思是课程内容拓展与意义生成的有机组成部分,可将其从内部隐性建构转变为外部显性分享。 Autobiography curriculum interpretation and teaching reform based on the post- modernism of hu- manities and social sciences of college and university is a kind of course content expansion and teaching form en- lightened by post- modern curriculum view theory. Three features are advocated in this curriculum interpretation and teaching reform, firstly, knowledge is supposed to be open and relative, can be pondered and deduced as well; secondly, interpretation of curriculum is supposed to be multiple and individual, that is to say, to understand the content of curriculum out of one' s own life is a necessary; autobiography of both teacher and students can be regar- ded as component part of curriculum and it should be shifted from internal activity to external presentation.
作者 杨晓峰
出处 《重庆高教研究》 2013年第3期77-81,共5页 Chongqing Higher Education Research
基金 重庆市高等教育教学改革2012年度重点立项课题(1202067)
关键词 后现代 自传式课程 人文社会学科 教学改革 post - modernism autobiography curriculum humanities and social sciences teaching reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献51

  • 1陈雨亭.性别差异与日常教育实践——对六位初中教师的性别观念及实践的探究[J].当代教育科学,2005(8):34-40. 被引量:14
  • 2Wang, Hongyu The Call from the Stranger on a Journey Home:Curriculum in a Third Space.New York:Peter Lang Publish- hag, Inc.2004 : 5.
  • 3Pinar, William(in print).Curriculum Theory Since 1950:Crisis, Reconceptualization,Internationalization.In F.Michael Connelly (ed).Handbook of Curriculum Research.London: Sage Publications.
  • 4陈雨亭.如何研究学校教育情境中的自我?--威康·派纳的“存在钵硷课程”研究.全球教育展望[M].2009(5).
  • 5Grumet, Madeleine R.Existential and Phenomenological Foundatiom of Autobiographical Methods.In William F. Pinar,and William M.Reynolds (eds).Understanding Curriculum as Phenomenological and DeConstructed Text. New York:Teachers College Press.1992:38.
  • 6杜海玲.狐狸庵的良性恶作剧.文汇报[N].2005-6-8(11).
  • 7[德]卡书·亚斯贝斯,王德峰译.时代的精神状况[M],上海:上海译文出版社.1997:2.
  • 8Pinar,William.Preface:What Should Be and What Might Be.ln Janet Miller.Sounds of Silenee Breaking:Women,Autobiography;Curriculum.New York:Peter Lang.2005:XIII-XIV:.
  • 9[法]来歇尔·福柯,谢强、马月译.知识考古学[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.1998:1;9.
  • 10[奥]弗洛伊德,杨韶刚译.一个幻觉的未来[M].北京:华夏出版社.1999:13.

共引文献8

同被引文献32

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部