期刊文献+

水洗及酸洗对毛竹热解产物的影响 被引量:5

Effect of water and acid leaching on pyrolysis products of Phyllostachys pubescens
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探讨竹材资源的加工利用途径,以毛竹为原料,分别采用去离子水和质量分数为3%的H2SO4溶液对毛竹进行水洗或酸洗预处理.采用一喷动式流化床热解炉对毛竹原料和水洗或酸洗预处理样品进行热解实验,考察升温速率、热解终温温度、水洗或酸洗预处理时间等对热解产物和液相产物组成分布的影响.热解结果表明,在不同升温速率和热解终温下,毛竹热解过程明显不同.经水洗或酸洗预处理后的毛竹样品热解结果显示,水洗使毛竹热解生成的固体产物得率降低而液体产物得率升高,造成了液体产物中有机小分子及苯酚质量分数的升高,且随水洗时间的延长而加强.酸洗促进了固体产物的生成,表明酸具有催化热解过程中脱水反应的作用.水洗及酸洗显著提高了液体产物中糠醛的质量分数. In order to deve pretreated by water and 3 lop the utilization technology of bamboo materials, Phyllestachys pubescens was %(mass fraction) sulfuric acid leaching, and then pyrolyzed in a spouted fluid- ized-bed furnace. The effect of heating rate, pyrolysis temperature, water or acid leaching time on pyroly- sis products and component distribution of liquid product was investigated. Pyrolysis results show that Phyllestachys pubescens undergoes different pyrolysis process at different heating rates and pyrolysis tem- peratures. Product analysis of pretreated sample pyrolysis indicates that water leaching depresses the for- mation of char and promotes the yield of liquid product, also increases the mass fractions of organic light molecules and phenol in liquid product. The influence becomes greater as water leaching time is prolonged. Acid leaching promotes the formation of char, which indicates that acid catalyzes dehydration reaction dur- ing pyrolysis. Both water and acid leaching obviously increase furfural mass fraction in liquid product.
出处 《浙江大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期1313-1320,共8页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science
关键词 毛竹 水洗 酸洗 热解 Phyllostachys pubescens water leaching acid leaching pyrolysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

二级参考文献93

共引文献120

同被引文献44

  • 1谭洪,王树荣,骆仲泱,岑可法.生物质三组分热裂解行为的对比研究[J].燃料化学学报,2006,34(1):61-65. 被引量:83
  • 2王少光,武书彬,郭秀强,郭伊丽.玉米秸秆木素的化学结构及热解特性[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(3):39-42. 被引量:28
  • 3王树荣,廖艳芬,刘倩,骆仲泱,岑可法.酸洗预处理对纤维素热裂解的影响研究[J].燃料化学学报,2006,34(2):179-183. 被引量:29
  • 4苗霞,罗嘉,李桂英,胡常伟.毛竹在氢气中的催化热解研究[J].化学研究与应用,2007,19(5):507-512. 被引量:7
  • 5WANG S R, WANG K G, LIU Q. Comparison of the pyrolysis behavior of lignins from different tree species[ J]. Biotechnol Adv, 2009, 27 ( 5 ) : 562-567.
  • 6BU Q, LEI H, REN S, WANG L, HOLLADAY J, ZHANG Q, TANG J, RUAN R. Phenol and phenolics from lignocellulosic biomass by catalytic microwave pyrolysis E J ]. Bioresour Technol, 2011, 102 ( 13 ) : 7004 -7007.
  • 7UCHIMIYA M, WARTELLE L H, KLASSON K T, LIMA I M. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on biochar property and function as a heavy metal sorbent in soilJ]. J Agric Food Chem, 2011, 59(6) : 2501-2510.
  • 8XIAO L P, SHI Z J, X'U F, SUN R C. Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomassE J. Bioresour Technol, 2012, 118: 619-623.
  • 9FAHMI R, BRIDGWATER A V, THAIN S C. Prediction of Klason lignin and lignin thermal degradation products by Py-GC/MS in a collection of Lolium and Festuca grasses [ J. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2007, 80 (1) : 16-23.
  • 10FIERRO V, TORNE-FERNADEZ V, MONTANEE D, CELZARD A. Study of the decomposition of kraft lignin impregnated with orthophosphoric acid J]. Thermochemical Acta, 2005, 433 (1/2) : 142-148.

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部