论案件侦查的选择性

On Selectivity of Case Investigation

理论主流以及官方正式表态中,始终坚持案件不分大小,都应一体对待并开展侦查,但受制于侦查资源以及其他现实因素的制约,案件侦查必然会出现选择性。案件是否侦查以及侦查介入程度的取舍,关系到个案被害人和社会公众以及作案人等利益关联方的切身利益,侦查机关应以公正为基本要求,确立案件选择的基本标准,以案件自身的特征以及侦查价值为主要决定要素。在可能的情形下,侦查机关应对所有已立案的案件开展初步调查,并以对调查结果的评估结论作为是否实施后续侦查的根据。

In mainstream theory and official regardless of the size of cases. But it is inevitable investigation resources and other social elements. statement, cases should be handled and investigated wholly to face selectivity in case investigation due to the restriction of Whether the case should be investigated and the choice of involvement degree concerns the vital interests of interests related parties such as victims, social public and perpetrators. Investigation organs should establish basic criteria of selectivity, regarding justice as the basic requirement, characteristics and investigative value of cases as major determinants. If possible, investigation organs should conduct preliminary investigation towards all filed cases and continue follow - up investigation based on evaluation conclusion drawn from investigation results.