UHS与Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术的对比研究

Comparative study of inguinal hernia repair with UHS mesh and Lichtenstein repair

目的比较腹股沟疝应用UHS装置与Lichtenstein修补术式的优缺点。方法回顾性分析2010-12—2012-12间行UHS疝修补114例与Lichtenstein疝修补88例手术时间、术后住院天数、慢性疼痛、并发症等资料。结果 2种术式在住院时间、复发率等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Lichtenstein修补术手术时间明显短,手术费用低,但术后慢性疼痛评分较高。结论应用UHS装置与Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术均可以用于腹股沟疝修补,各有优缺点。

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between inguinal hernia repair with UHS mesh and Lichtenstein repair. Methods Two hundred two patients with inguinal hernia from Dec. 2010 to Dec. 2012 were divided into two groups ： Lichtenstein repair group and inguinal hernia repair group with UHS mesh. The postoperative complications, hospital stay,off bed time,postoperative chronic pain and recurrence rate were compared between 2 groups. Results The differences in hospital stay , off bed time and complication were not significant between two groups. The operating time with UHS mesh was longer than Lichtenstein repair, also the cost with UHS mesh was higher ？ But pain score about postoperative chronic pain showed significant in the two groups. Conclusion Inguinal hernia repair with UHS mesh and Lichtenstein repair had the similar curative effect. Both of them had their respective pros and cros.