期刊文献+

便携式血糖仪测量结果正确度和精密度评价方法的研究 被引量:5

Evaluation on the accuracy and precision of the results obtained from portable blood glucose meters
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同评价标准对便携式血糖仪血糖测量结果正确度和精密度评价结果的影响。方法以5个水平冰冻人血清葡萄糖标准物质为评价样本评价A~E 5种常用便携式血糖仪的正确度和精密度,分别按计量学溯源标准、国标标准判断各血糖仪测量结果的正确度,分别按国标标准、自定义标准判断各血糖仪测量结果的精密度。结果按计量学溯源标准判断,各血糖仪血糖测量结果的正确度均不可接受;按国标标准判断,B血糖仪血糖测量结果的正确度可接受,其他均不可接受。按国标标准,血糖测量结果的精密度均符合要求;按自定义标准,D、E 2种血糖测量结果的精密度不符合要求。结论用不同的正确度、精密度评价标准可得出不同的结论,血糖仪测量结果正确度、精密度的评价方法亟待完善。 Objective:To investigate the effect of different evaluation standards on the accuracy and precision of the results obtained from different portable blood glucose meters. Methods:The accuracy and precision of 5 kinds of commonly used portable blood glucose meters, A^E, were evaluated using 5 concentration levels of glucose standard materials. The accuracy of the result obtained from each blood glucose meter was evaluated with the metrological traceability standard and national standard, while the precision of the result with the national standard and customized standard. Results:Judged with the metrological traceability standard, the accuracy of the results obtained from all blood glucose meters was unacceptable, while, judged with the national standard, the accuracy of results was also unacceptable except B branded blood glucose meter. Judged with the national standard, the precision of the results obtained from all blood glucose meters was acceptable, while, judged with the customized standard, the precision of the results was also acceptable except D and E branded blood glucose meters. Conclusion:When evaluated wirh different standards, the acceptability of the accuracy and precision of portable blood glucose meters was different. The evaluation methods for the accuracy and precision of the portable blood glucose meters should be improved.
出处 《临床检验杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期538-541,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
基金 北京市首都医学发展科研基金资助项目(2009-2100 2009-3182)
关键词 便携式血糖仪 葡萄糖 标准物质 正确度 精密度 portable blood glucose meter glucose standard material accuracy precision
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Yang WY, Lu JM, Wen JP, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China[ J]. N Engl J Med,2010,362 (12) :1090-1101.
  • 2湘财证券-三诺生物.兼具渠道和成本优势,分享国内血糖监测市场高景气[EB/OL].(2012-09-24)[2013-02-11].http://pan.baidu.com/share/link?shareid=240778&uk=2268378466&rid=4261468892.
  • 3卫生部临床检验中心.2012年全国POCT血糖仪检测质量评价说明[EB/OL].(2012-04-16)[2013-02-05].http://wenku.baidu.corn/view/a3192eff7clcfad6195fa7fe.html.
  • 4王薇,王治国,李少男.中国便携式血糖检测仪的质量评价[J].国际检验医学杂志,2011,32(3):382-384. 被引量:5
  • 5JJF1001-2011,通用计量术语及定义技术规范[s].
  • 6中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T19634-2005体外诊断检验系统自测用血糖监测系统通用技术条件[S].2005-01-24.
  • 7GB/T1 4710-1993医用电气设备环境要求及试验方法[S].
  • 8WS/T 226-2002.便携式血糖仪血液葡萄糖测定指南[S].
  • 9NCCLS EP9-A2, Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Pa- tient Samples ; Approved Guideline-Second Edition [ S 1. NCCLS, 2002.
  • 10郭满容,谭潭,林应标,陈尚志,颜复生,陈虹亮,李毅.快速血糖仪与全自动生化仪比对试验及其质量管理研究[J].实用预防医学,2011,18(11):2046-2048. 被引量:9

二级参考文献27

  • 1尹小兵,柴琼霞,李展锋.从动脉测压管采血行血电解质及血糖测定的研究[J].护理研究,2005,19(1):55-56. 被引量:17
  • 2池胜英,陈筱菲,徐克,陈晓东,袁谦.33台快速血糖仪调查结果分析[J].临床检验杂志,2005,23(2):160-160. 被引量:28
  • 3陆丽萍.影响指尖血糖监测的因素分析.护理研究,2002,5(5):292-292.
  • 4中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-GL02:能力验证结果的统计处理和能力评价指南[S].2006.
  • 5Martha MF,Cheryl H,KarmeenK,et al.A core curriculum for diaetse education[J].Chieago Illinois,1994:388-363.
  • 6张远春.检验与临床诊断--围手术期分册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2006:10.
  • 7国家质量技术监督局.GB/T15483.11999利用实验室间比对的能力验证PT第1部分:能力验证计划的建立和运作[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.
  • 8US Department of Health and Human Services. Regulations for implementing the clinical laboratory inpruvement amendments of 1988:a summary[J].Recommm Rep,1992,41(2):1.
  • 9国家质量监督局.GB/T20470-2006临床实验室室间质量评价要求[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
  • 10Bezdek J. Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms. New York: Plenum, 1981

共引文献31

同被引文献27

引证文献5

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部