美国民事请求排除规则及其借鉴被引量：3

下载PDF

导出

摘要美国民事诉讼法上的既判力规则包括民事请求排除规则和民事争点排除规则两项内容。民事请求排除规则不仅禁止当事人就已经裁决过的请求再次向法院提起诉讼,同时还禁止当事人将应当在先前诉讼中提出的请求向法院提起诉讼。民事请求排除规则的适用应当符合判决具有有效性、判决具有终局性、判决针对实体问题而作出、前后两次诉讼中提出的请求相同和前后两次诉讼中当事人相同等五个基本条件。民事请求排除规则的适用有多种例外情形。民事请求排除规则在诉讼过程中发挥着重要的功能,我国有必要以美国法为参照制定符合我国国情的请求排除规则。

作者胡军辉

机构地区湘潭大学法学院

出处《政治与法律》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期138-145,共8页 Political Science and Law

基金湖南省社科基金项目"英美法系国家民事既判力理论与规则研究"(项目编号:11YBA277)的阶段性成果

关键词美国民事诉讼民事请求排除例外情形规则借鉴

分类号 DF728 [政治法律—诉讼法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1United States v. Ryan, 810 F. 2d 650, 654(7th Cir. 1987). 3.
2Restatement Second of Judgments 18 : (1982).
3Edward D. Cavanagh:Issue Prelusion in complex litigation,The Review of Litigation , http://works, bepress, com/edward_cavanagh/3.
4白绿铉.《美国民事诉讼法》[M].经济日报出版社,1998年版.第108-112页.
5Robert C. Casad & Kevin M. Clermont, Resjudicata-A Handbook on Its Therory, Doctrine, and Practice, 2001 Carolina Academic Press. p41.
6[美]杰克·H·弗兰德泰尔等：《民事诉讼法》，夏登峻等译,中国政法大学出版社2003年版，第301页
7[美]斯蒂文·N·苏本等:《民事诉讼法-原理、实务与运作环境》,傅郁林译,中国政法大学出版社2004年版,第762-764页.
8[美]斯蒂文·N·苏本等:《美国民事诉讼的真谛》,蔡彦敏、徐卉译,法律出版社2002年版,第261-263页.
9Robert C. Casad & Kevin M. Clermont, Res judicata-A Handbook on Its Therory, Doctrine, and Practice, 2001 Carolina Academic Press. p91-92.
10Restatement Second of Judgments 20 : b(1982).

二级参考文献15

1"An Act to Amend the Code of Procedure, "1849 N. Y. Laws 613, §119, §122.
2Shields v. Barrow, 58 U.S. (17 How.) 130, 139 (1854).
3Ellen E, Sward. A History of the Civil Trial in the United States [J]. U. Kan. L. Rev, 2003(51): 383.
4D D FIELD. Codification of the Law: Correspondence between the California Bar and Field [C]// Speeches, Arguments, and Miscellaneous Papers of David Dudley Field. New York: D Appleton, 1890: 349-354.
5D D FIELD. What Shall Be Done with the Practice of the Courts? [C]// Speeches, Arguments, and Miscellaneous Papers of David Dudley Field. New York: D Appleton, 1890:226 227.
6Fiero. The Reformed Procedure--Its Advantages and Its Limitations [J]. Alb. L. J. 1896(53): 327-328.
7Roscoe Pound. The Etiquette of Justice [J]. Proceedings Neb. St. Bar Assn. 1909(3): 237.
8ELLEN E. SWARD.The Decline of the civil jury [M]. Carolina Academic Press, 2001: 108-109.
9Millar, Robert Wyness. Civil Procedure of the Trial Court in Historical Perspective [M]. New York: the Law Center of New York University for the National Conference of Judicial Councils 1952:214.
10Robert G. Bone. Mapping the Boundaries of the Dispute: Conceptions of Ideal Lawsuit Structure from the Field Code to the Federal Rules [J]. Colum. L. Rev, 1989(89): 80 81.