期刊文献+

内部人延迟披露股票交易信息的经济动机和后果研究 被引量:4

Delays in Trade Disclosure by Insiders in the A-Shares Market: Motivation and Consequences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 强制内部人在交易股票后及时披露交易信息,是监管层抑制内部人获利能力的重要举措。利用大样本的高管交易数据考察及时披露政策执行情况的实证研究显示,15%的交易出现了延迟披露,鲜有受到惩罚,披露管制的执行较为宽松。内部人选择延迟披露存在机会主义的"猫腻"。在延迟披露的交易中,连续性交易、违规交易的问题更严重,交易对未来股价走势的预测性更强,即内幕性交易的概率更大。这说明在现有披露管制宽松、内幕交易管制较严格的不均衡监管环境下,内部人策略性地利用披露违规(即延迟披露)来降低内幕性交易的暴露风险、增大内幕性交易的实施收益。从市场对交易披露公告的反应来看,延迟披露行为确实对价格发现产生了负面影响。上述发现凸显了监管层强化交易披露管制执行的重要性。 The Chinese A-shares market witnessed a great reform of non-tradable shares in 2006.Until the end of 2011,most non-tradable shares had experienced expiration of lock-up.Insiders who were prohibited to trade can trade frequently now.Insider transactions have become a new phenomenon which attracts much attention.Some empirical studies have found that owing to lax regulation,insider trading in the A-shares market is prevalent and serious,with high trading profitability for the average insider. To curb the profitability of insider transaction,regulators require public trade disclosure right after the completion of trade.In the A-shares market,insiders,including directors,supervisors,top managers and shareholders owning more than 5% of total shares,are required to disclose detailed trade information within two days after trade completion,but no definite punishment is stipulated for delayed disclosure. This paper is an empirical study of the enforcement of disclosure policy based on top managers' trading data disclosed by companies listed on Shanghai Securities Exchange.15 percent of the transactions were disclosed with delay,but no punishment was imposed,evidencing the slack enforcement of disclosure policy.In comparison,strict sanction was imposed on insiders who had other illegal insider trades,such as short swing trade or trade during sensitive periods around the announcement of important events.Furthermore,opportunistic motives underlie insiders' postponement of disclosure.Compared to timely disclosed trades,delayed trades have significantly higher probability of continuous trades and illegal trades,such as short swing trades and trades during sensitive periods.Besides,delayed trades can significantly predict future stock returns,indicating greater probability of informed trading.The evidence shows that when insiders embark on illegal insider trading,they always choose to delay disclosure.Why can disclosure delay reduce the exposure risk of illegal trades? As investors always focus on updated trades for new information and regulators are more likely to penalize the latest illegal trades,disclosure delay can,to some extent,shield illegal trades from the attention of investors and regulators.Under the legislative environment where strict enforcement on insider trading and lax enforcement on disclosure delay coexist,insiders may strategically reduce the exposure risk of insider trading and expand trading profitability through violating disclosure policies.An analysis of the economic consequences of disclosure delay shows that it negatively affects market price discovery. This paper has important implications for disclosure regulation.Due to the slack enforcement of disclosure policy,disclosure delay has become an opportunistic means for insiders to enlarge trading profitability and carry on illegal trades,and therefore has become a loophole of regulation,weakening regulation effectiveness.How do regulators and insiders interact? What is the internal mechanism of regulation policies and how does the enforcement of policies influence insider trading? These issues have long been the focus of academic attention.This paper is the first to analyze the impact of imbalanced regulatory enforcement on insider trading behavior.
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期189-200,共12页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC790313) 浙江省自然科学基金一般项目(LY12G02022) 浙江大学紫金计划和青年自主科研项目
关键词 内部人交易 股票交易 内幕交易 高管交易 延迟披露 违规交易 insider transaction stock exchange insider trading top managers' trading delay disclosure illegal trades
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1J.F.Jaffe,"Special Information and Insider Trading," Journal of Business,Vol.47,No.3 (1974),pp.410-421.
  • 2D.Givoly & D.Palmon,"Insider Trading and the Exploitation of Inside Information:Some Empirical Evidence,"Journal of Business,Vol.58,No.1(1985),pp.69-87.
  • 3J.Lakonishok & I.Lee,"Are Insider Trades Informative?" Review of Financial Studies,Vol.14,No.1(2001),pp.79-111.
  • 4S.Huddart,J.Hughes & C.Levine,"Public Disclosure and Dissimulation of Insider Trades,"Econometrica,Vol.69,No.3(2001),pp.665-681.
  • 5A.Etebari,A.Tourani-Rad & A.Gilbert,"Disclosure Regulation and the Profitability of Insider Trading:Evidence from New Zealand," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,Vol.12(2004),pp.479-502.
  • 6S.Cheng,V.Nagar & M.V.Rajan,"Insider Trades and Private Information:The Special Case of Delayed-Disclosure Trades," Review of Financial Studies,Vol.20 (2007),pp.1833-1864.
  • 7J.Fidrmuc,M.Goergen & L.Renneboog,"Insider Trading,News Releases and Ownership Concentration,"Journal of Finance,Vol.61(2006),pp.2931-2973.
  • 8朱茶芬,陈超,李志文.信息优势、波动风险与大股东的选择性减持行为[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010,40(2):164-173. 被引量:69
  • 9贾明,张喆,万迪昉.股改方案、代理成本与大股东解禁股出售[J].管理世界,2009,25(9):148-165. 被引量:45
  • 10曾庆生.公司内部人具有交易时机的选择能力吗?——来自中国上市公司内部人卖出股票的证据[J].金融研究,2008(10):117-135. 被引量:124

二级参考文献123

共引文献276

同被引文献16

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部