期刊文献+

不同刺激重复量对反应抑制后效应的影响 被引量:3

Impact of Different Stimulus Repetition Quantities on After-effects of Response Inhibition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 旨在探讨不同刺激重复量对反应抑制后效应的影响。在不同刺激重复量条件下,让被试完成停止信号任务。结果发现,从总体来看,刺激重复量因素上的主效应显著,重复类型因素上主效应不显著;信号抑制条件下不同刺激重复量后无信号试次反应时与总的无信号试次反应时差异不显著;信号反应条件下不同刺激重复量后无信号试次反应时与总的无信号试次反应时差异显著。本研究表明不同刺激重复量条件下的反应抑制后效应是认知控制的执行加工而非自动化的记忆提取。 The current study is to explore the impact of stimulus repetition quantities on after-effects of response inhibition. The participants were instructed to perform the Stop-signal tasks with different stimulus repetition quantities. The results indicated that the reaction time of stimulus repetition quantities was significant and the repeated types were not significant. In successful response inhibition, the reaction time of no-signal trials after different stimulus repetition quantities were not significantly different from those after no-signal trials. In unsuccessful response inhibition, the reaction time of no-signal trials after different stimulus repetition quantities significantly different from that of after no-signal trials. These findings suggested that after-effects of response inhibition reflected executive process of cognitive control rather than memory retrieval of automaticity.
作者 白学军 朱海
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 2013年第3期301-304,共4页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(08JJDXLX2667)的资助
关键词 刺激重复量 反应抑制后效应 认知控制理论 自动化理论 stimulus repetition quantities, after-effects of response inhibition, cognitive control theories, theories of automaticity.
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Bissett, P. G., & Logan G. D. (2011) . Balancing cognitive de- mands: Control adjustments in the Stop-signal paradigm. Jour- nal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cogni- tion, 37 (2) , 392-404.
  • 2Bissett, P. G., & Logan, G. D. (2012) . Post-Stop-Signal Adjust- ments: Inhibition Improves Subsequent Inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(4) , 955-966.
  • 3Emeric, E. E., Brown, J. W., Boueher, L., Carpenter, R. H. S., Hanes, D. P., Harris, R., Schall, J. D. (2007) . Influence of history on countermand-ing saccade performance in humans and macaque monkeys. Vision Research, 47, 35-49.
  • 4Leotti, L. A., & Wager, T. D. (2010) . Motivational influences on response inhibition measures. Journal of Experimental Psychol- ogy: HumanPerception and Pe:fo:e, 36, 430-447.
  • 5Liddle, E. B., Scerif, G., Hollis, C. P., Batty, M. J., Groom, M. J., Liotti, M., & Liddle, P. F. (2009) . Looking before you leap: A theory of motivated control of action. Cognition, 112, 141-158.
  • 6Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984) . On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91 (3) , 295-327.
  • 7Rieger, M., & Gauggel, S. (1999) . Inhibitory after-effects in the stop signal paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 509-518.
  • 8Schachar, R. J., Chen, S., Logan, G. D., Omstein, T. J., Crosbie, J., Ickowicz, A., & Pakulak, A. (2004) . Evidence for an error monitoring deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychol-ogy, 32, 285-293.
  • 9Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008) . Long-term aftereffects of re-sponse inhibition: Memory retrieval task goals and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1229-1235.
  • 10Verbruggen, F, Logan, G. D., Liefooghe, By & Vandierendonck, A. (2008) . Short-term aftereffects of response inhibition." Repetition priming or between-trial control adjustment? Journal of Experimen- tal Psychology: Human Perception and Pe:ormance, 34, 413-426.

同被引文献38

  • 1周亮,肖水源,何晓燕,厉洁,刘慧铭.BIS-11中文版的信度与效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(4):343-344. 被引量:96
  • 2Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psycholog- ical Review, 91(3), 295-327.
  • 3Boueher, L., Palmeri, T. J., Logan, G. D., & Schall, J. D. (2007). Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race mod- el ofeountennandi saceades. Psychological Review, 114, 376-397.
  • 4Bissett, P. G.,& Logan, G. D. (2011)Balancing cognitive de- mands: Control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm. Jour- nal of experimental psychology: Learning,memory, and cogni- tion, 37(2):392-404.
  • 5Verbmggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perform- ance, 35, 835 - 854.
  • 6Emerie, E. E., Brown, J. W., Boucher, L., Carpenter, R. H. S., Hanes, D. P., Harris, R.,... Schall, J, D. (2007). Influence of history on eountermand-ing saccade performance in humans and macaque monkeys. Vision Research, 47, 35-49.
  • 7Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: An orienting ac- count. Cognition, 111,275-279.
  • 8Rieger, M., & Gauggel, S.(1999). Inhibitory after-effects in the stop signal paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 509-518.
  • 9Leotti, L. A., & Wager, T. D. (2010). Motivational influences on response inhibition measures. Journal of Experimental Psy- chology: Human_Perception and Performance, 36, 430-447.
  • 10Nelson, M. 3., Boucher, L., Logan, G. D., Palmed, T. J., & Schall, J. D. (2010). Nonindependent and nonstationary re- sponse times in stopping and stepping saccade tasks. Atten- tion, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1913-1929.

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部