期刊文献+

静脉注射利多卡因对2型糖尿病患者气管插管期心率变异性的影响 被引量:6

Changes in heart rate variability of patients with type 2 diabetes on intravenous lidocaine during intubation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 研究静脉注射利多卡因在全麻诱导气管插管期间对2型糖尿病患者自主神经系统功能的影响. 方法 70例择期腹部手术2型糖尿病患者,采用McLeod改良Wichmann-Hill伪随机数发器生成的随机序列.随机双盲分成利多卡因组(L组,诱导前静脉注射1.5 mg/kg利多卡因)和对照组(C组,诱导前静脉注射等容量氯化钠溶液),每组35例,分别于麻醉诱导前(T0)、麻醉诱导后1 min(T1)、麻醉诱导后3 min(插管前,T2)及插管后1 min(T3)、6 min(T4)用心率(heart rate,HR)变异功率谱分析技术观察患者的心率变异性(heart rate variability,HRV)改变. 结果 与T0比较,T1~T2时,L组低频段(low frequency,LF)(233±131)、(219±98) ms2/Hz和总功率频段(total power,TP)(751±219)、(761±236) ms2/Hz,C组LF (296±99)、(279±103) ms2/Hz,高频段(high frequency,HF)(91±36)、(97±43) ms2/Hz,低频/高频比(LF/HF ratio,LF/HF)(1.8±0.7)、(1.9±0.6)及TP(759±197)、(751±213) ms2/Hz均显著降低(P<0.05),组间比较,L组LF低于C组(P<0.05),而L组HF高于C组(P<0.05);T3~T4,两组LF、HF及TP均较To显著升高(P<0.05),而L组的LF/HF较T0差异无统计意义,C组的LF/HF(6.0±1.8)、(5.9±1.9)较T0显著升高(P<0.05);组间比较L组LF、TP升高程度显著低于C组(P<0.05),HF组间差异无统计意义.与T0比较,T1~T2时,两组HR、收缩压(stolic blood pressure,SP)、舒张压(diastolic blood pressure,DP)均显著降低(P<0.05);组间比较,L组SP、DP降低程度显著高于C组(P<0.05),而两组间HR的改变差异无统计学意义.T3~T4,两组HR、SP、DP较麻醉诱导后均显著升高(P<0.01).组间比较L组HR、SP及DP升高程度显著低于C组(P<0.05). 结论 全麻诱导气管插管期间2型糖尿病患者对自主神经功能一定的干扰,静注利多卡因能明显抑制插管操作引起的对自主神经功能的干扰,有利于维护2型糖尿病患者围插管期心脏的自主神经调节功能. Objective To explore effects of the autonomic nervous system function on Intravenous injection of lidocaine during intubation in patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods 70 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly divided into lidocaine group (group L,n=35,with intravenous 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine) and control group (group C,n=35,with intravenous sodium chloride solution),The changes in heart rate variability (HRV) were recorded at following time points:prior to anesthesia (T0),1 min after anesthesia induction (T1),3 min after anesthesia induction and prior to intubation (T2),1 min after intubation (T3),the HRV was observed with power spectral analysis.Results After induction of anesthesia (T1,T2),group L of low-frequency(LF)(233±131),(219±98) ms2/Hz,and total power of HRV spectrum(TP)(751±219),(761±236) ms2/Hz,group C of LF(296±99),(279± 103) ms2/Hz,high frequency (HF) (91 ±36),(97±43) ms2/Hz,low frequency/high frequency ratio (LF/HF) (1.8±0.7,1.9±0.6) and TP (759±197),(751±213) ms2/Hz were significantly lower than T0,inter-group comparison group L LF lower than group C; but HF higher than group C.After intubation (T3,T4),two groups of LF,HF and TP were significantly higher than T0 (P〈0.05),D group of LF/HF were not significantly higher than T0,however,group C of LF/HF (6.0±1.8,5.9±1.9) were significantly higher than T0 (P〈0.05),inter-group comparison GroupL with LF,TP increased significantly lower than the groupC (P〈0.05),HF inter-group difference was not significant.After induction of anesthesia (T1,T2),both groups of HR,SP,DP lower than T0.inter-group comparison group L SP,DP lower than group C; HR inter-group difference was not significant.After intubation (T3,T4),two groups of HR,SP,DP were significantly higher than T0 (P〈0.05),inter-group comparison group L H R,SP,DP lower than group C (P〈0.05).Conclusions autonomic nervous system function changed following tracheal intubation during induction of anesthesia in patients with type 2 diabetes,Intravenous lidocaine inhibit those changes.This is beneficial to maintain cardiac autonomic nerve function in patients with coronary artery disease during intubation.
出处 《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》 CAS 2013年第6期503-506,共4页 International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
关键词 利多卡因 2型糖尿病 心率变异性 气管插管 Lidocaine Type 2 diabetes Heart rate variability Tracheal intubatio
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献21

  • 1Ye Ping, et al. PLA Genefal Hospital, Beijing 100853. Chin J Med Lab Tech 1994.The Study of Apolipoprotein B Gene Polymorphisms by Polymerase Chain Reaction.[J].Chinese Medical Journal,1994(7):21-21. 被引量:1
  • 2邵兵,刘琴湘,张斌,李泉,邹冬玲,郭训.不同剂量瑞芬太尼复合异丙酚的气管插管条件及血流动力学的变化[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2006,27(5):261-263. 被引量:15
  • 3管珩,刘志民,李光伟,郭晓蕙,许樟榕,邹大进,邢惠莉,刘伟,盛正妍,田浩明,朱大龙,于德民,庄维特,陈璐璐,翁建平.50岁以上糖尿病人群周围动脉闭塞性疾病相关因素分析[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(1):23-27. 被引量:119
  • 4傅国强,王兰,李连红.利多卡因不同给药方法对全麻苏醒拔管时血流动力学变化的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(1):72-73. 被引量:33
  • 5Hirseh AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection,awareness,and treatment in primary care[J]. JAMA,2001,286(11) :1317.
  • 6Dr Unwin N. The Global Lower Extremity Amputation Study Group: Epidemiology of lower extremity amputation in centers in Europe. North America and East Asia [J]. Br J Surg,2000,87(3) :328.
  • 7Asakawa H, Tokunaga K, Kawakami F. Comparison of risk factors of macrovascular complications peripheral vascular disease. Cerebral vascular disease, and coronary heart disease in Japanese type 2 diseases mellitus patients [J]. J biabetes Comp,2000,14(4) : 307.
  • 8American Diabetes Association. Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes[J]. Diabetes Care, 2003,26(12): 3333.
  • 9Paul M, Rachel P, Kristi R, et al. Relationship between HbAlc level and peripheral arterial diseaseEJ~. Diabetes Care, 2005,28(8) : 1981.
  • 10Casadei A, Floreani M, Fanolla A, et al. Peripheral arterial diseasc is a Population of type 2 diabetic patients: its correlation with diabetic microangiopathy and laboratory parameters[J]. Minerva Cardioangiol, 2003,51 (3) : 323.

共引文献71

同被引文献70

  • 1方俊君,周昕平.艾司洛尔治疗冠脉搭桥术后心脏电风暴1例[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(35):478-478. 被引量:1
  • 2傅润乔,马自成,金士翱.全麻诱导气管插管前后血浆ANP的变化及其临床意义[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1995,15(2):59-61. 被引量:11
  • 3吴志红.心率变异性测定在室性心律失常中的应用[J].中国实用医刊,2010,37(15):77-78. 被引量:5
  • 4Beom JW, Kim JM, Chung EJ, et al. Corrected QT interval prolongation during severe hypoglycemia without hypokalemia in patients with type 2 diabetes [J]. Diabetes Metab J, 2013,37 (3) : 190-195.
  • 5Qi DY, Wang K, Zhang H, et al. Efficacy of intravenous lidocaine versus placebo on attenuating cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials [J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2013,79 (12) : 1423-1435.
  • 6Madsen LB, Rasmussen JK, Moller DS, et al. Heart rate variability in White-coat hypertention [J]. Blood Pressure Monitoring, 2008,13 ( 2 ) : 65-71.
  • 7Min JH, Chai HS, Kim YH, et al. Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction: remifentanil vs. lidocaine with esmolol [J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2010,76(3) : 188-192.
  • 8Takekawa K, Yoshimi S, Kinoshita Y. Effects of intravenous lidocaine prior to intubation on postoperative airway symptoms [ J ]. J Anesth, 2006,20 ( 1 ) : 44-47.
  • 9Owczuk R, Wujtewicz MA, Sawicka W, et al. The effect of intravenous lidocaine on QT changes during tracheal intubation [ J ]. Anaesthesia, 2008,63 (9) : 924-931.
  • 10Cafiero T, Di Minno RM, Di Iorio C. QT interval and QT dispersion during the induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation: a comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl [J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2011,77(2) : 160-165.

引证文献6

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部