期刊文献+

不同浓度酒精对两种常见细菌生物膜的影响 被引量:2

Effects of different alcohol concentrations on the biofilms of two common bacteria
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同浓度的酒精对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌生物膜形成的抑制作用。方法配制不同浓度的酒精(1.25%、2.5%、5%和10%),作用于培养24 h形成成熟生物膜的金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠埃希菌,利用FDA/PI荧光染料染色,在激光共聚焦显微镜扫描生物膜并分析活菌与死菌比例。结果不同浓度的酒精对两种细菌生物膜的形成均有一定破坏作用,5%、10%浓度酒精对金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜破坏最大,活菌与死菌比例为0.142±0.007、0.006±0.001;10%浓度酒精对大肠埃希菌生物膜破坏最大,活菌与死菌比例为5.751±1.779。结论较低浓度的酒精可抑制金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠埃希菌生物膜的形成,且10%浓度的酒精效果最好。 Objective To study the effects of different alcohol concentrations against the biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Methods Different concentrations of alcohol ( 1.25%, 2.5%, 5% and 10% ) were used to treat Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli with biofilm after cultivated for 24 hours. The ratio of viable vs inactive organisms was analyzed by FDA/PI fluoresce- in staining through confocal microscopy scanning. Results Different concentrations of alcohol brought a certain degree of destroy to the biofilms. 5% and 10% concentrations caused the most severe damage to the biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus, with the ratio of viable vs. inactive organisms being 0. 142 ± 0. 007 and 0. 006 ± 0.001 respectively. 10% of alcohol acutely destroyed the biofilm of Escherichia coli, with the ratio of viable vs. inactive organisms being 5.751±1. 779. Conclusion Lower concentration of alcohol inhibits the formation of biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli more effectly, with the optimal concentration being 10%.
出处 《中国微生态学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2013年第8期907-910,共4页 Chinese Journal of Microecology
基金 黑龙江省研究生创新课题(YJSCX2011-374HLJ)
关键词 酒精 细菌 生物膜 金黄色葡萄球菌 大肠埃希菌 Alcohol Bacterium Biofilm Staphylococcus aureus Escherichia coli
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms : a common cause of persistent infections [ J ]. Science, 1999,284 ( 5418 ) : 1318- 1322.
  • 2Lasa I. Towards the identification of the common features of bacterial biofilm development [ J ]. Int Mierobiol, 2006,9 ( 1 ) : 21-28.
  • 3Potera C. Forging a link between biofilm and disease [ J ]. Science, 1999,283 (5409) : 1837.
  • 4Hequet A, Humblot V, Berjeaud JM, et al. Optimized wafting of antimi- crobial peptides on stainless steel surface and biofilm resistance tests [ J ]. Colloids and Surfaces B : Biointerfaces,2011,84 (2) :301-309.
  • 5Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Moorer WR. Penetration of bacteria in bovine root dentine in vitro[ J]. Int Endod J ,2000,33( 1 ) :28-36.
  • 6胡曰健,王倩,马瑞,唐子圣,朱彩莲,何智妍,刘正,黄正蔚.生物膜定量分析仪对不同细菌早期生物膜形成能力的比较研究[J].中国微生态学杂志,2011,23(9):850-852. 被引量:3
  • 7Gotz F. Staphylococcus and biofilms [ J ]. Mol Microbial, 2002,43 (6) : 1367-1378.
  • 8Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms [ J ]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2002,15 ( 2 ) : 167- 193.
  • 9Chicurel M. Bacterial biofilms and infections-Slimebusters [ J ]. Na- ture, 2001,408 ( 6810 ) :284 -286.
  • 10李青.生理盐水替代酒精皮试消毒的效果观察[J].华北煤炭医学院学报,2010,12(3):343-344. 被引量:6

二级参考文献10

共引文献7

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部