期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

二语关系从句挂靠的歧义消解研究 被引量：4

Research on the ambiguity resolution of relative clause attachment in L2 processing
原文传递
导出
摘要 二语关系从句挂靠的歧义消解研究有助于发现语法知识和语言加工机制的分离性、母语和二语句法分析的差异性以及句子加工的跨语言变异等,从而推动相关语言学理论发展。在简要介绍与关系从句歧义消解有关的语言加工理论之后,本文归纳了国内外相关研究的成果,指出二语关系从句挂靠的歧义消解策略运用取决于学习者的母语和目标语特征、二语水平、认知能力等。为充分了解关系从句歧义消解的本质特征,必须采用多种研究方法,比较不同语言关系从句的歧义处理策略,探究语言因素和学习者因素在句子加工中的协同作用。 The study on the ambiguity resolution of relative clause （RC） attachment in L2 processing sheds light on the dissociation of grammatical knowledge from language processing routines, the differences between L1 and L2 parsing, and the cross-linguistic variation in sentence processing, thus promoting the development of relevant linguistic theories. After briefing several sentence processing models related to RC ambiguity resolution, this paper reviews the previous studies in the field. It illustrates that the disambiguation strategies of RC attachment in L2 processing are subject to learners＇ L1 and L2 linguistic features, L2 proficiency, cognitive abilities and so on. To fully understand the characteristics of RC ambiguity resolution, it is essential to adopt multiple methods to determine the interactive role of both linguistic and learner factors together with comparing RC disambiguation strategies in different languages.
作者 戴运财 王同顺 余樟亚
机构地区 浙江农林大学外国语学院 上海交通大学外国语学院 上海电力学院外国语学院
出处 《外语界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期55-62,共8页 Foreign Language World
关键词 句子加工 关系从句 歧义消解 二语习得 sentence processing relative clause ambiguity resolution L2 acquisition
分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I & Schlesewsky M. Processing Syntax and Morphology: A Neurocognitive Perspective [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • 2Clahsen H & Felser C. Grammatical processing in language learners [ J]. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2006a, 27 ( 1 ) : 3-42.
  • 3Clahsen H & Felser C. How native-like is non-native language processing? [ J]. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2006b, 10(12): 564-570.
  • 4Cuetos F & Mitchell D C. Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish [J]. Cognition, 1988, 30(1): 73-105.
  • 5Dussias P E. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners : Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 process- ing strategies [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2003, 25(4) : 529-557.
  • 6Dussias P E & Pinar P. Sentence parsing in L2 learners : Linguistic and experience-based factors [ A ]. In Rit- chic W & Bhatia T ( eds. ). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [ C ]. London: Academic Press Limit- ed, 2009. 295-317.
  • 7Dussias P E & Pinar P. Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English second language speakers [ J ]. Second Language Research, 2010, 26 (4) : 443-472.
  • 8Felser C & Roberts L. Processing wh-dependeneies in a second language : A cross-modal priming study [ J ]. Second Language Research, 2007, 23 (1) : 9-36.
  • 9Felser C et al. The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English [ J ]. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2003, 24(3): 453-489.
  • 10Fernandez E M. Processing strategies in second language acquisition [ A ]. In Klein E (ed.). The Develop- ment of Second Language Grammars: A Generative Approach [ C]. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998. 217- 240.

二级参考文献53

  • 1肖云南,吕杰.中国学生对英语关系从句习得的实证研究[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(4):259-264. 被引量：60
  • 2李金满,王同顺.当可及性遇到生命性:中国学习者英语关系从句使用行为研究[J].外语教学与研究,2007,39(3):198-205. 被引量：47
  • 3Doughty, C. 1991. Second language instruction does make a difference[J]. SSLA 13: 431-469.
  • 4Eckman, F. , L. Bell & D. Nelson. 1988. On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language [J]. Applied Linguistics 9: 1-20.
  • 5Gass, g. 1979. Language transfer and universal grammatical relations [J]. Language Learning 29 : 327 -344.
  • 6Hamilton, R. 1994. Is implicational generalization unidirection al and maximal? Evidence from relativization instruction in a second language [J]. Language Learning 44: 123- 157.
  • 7Izumi, S. 2003. Processing difficulty in comprehension and production of relative clauses by learners of English as a second language [J]. Language Learning 53: 285-323.
  • 8Tarallo, F. & J. Myhill. 1983. Interference and natural language in second language acquisition [J]. Language Learning 33 : 55-76.
  • 9Croteau, K, C. 1995. Second language acquisition of relative clause structures by learners of Italian[A]. In F. R. Eckman et al. (Eds.). Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy [C]. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 115-128.
  • 10Hawkins, R. 1989. Do second language learners acquire restrictive relative clauses on the basis or relational or configurational information? The acquisition of French subject, direct object and genitive restrictive relative clauses by second language learners [J]. Second Language Research 5:158-188.

共引文献18

同被引文献60

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

外语界
2013年 第4期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部