期刊文献+

图书馆读者满意度评价模型的差异性分析 被引量:7

Analysis on Dissimilarities Among the Evaluation Models of Library Readers Satisfaction Degree
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过文献调查,发现当前图书馆满意度评价模型主要是基于SERVQUAL、LibQUAL+^(TM)、RodskiGroup、AHP以及ACSI模型进行构建的。从各模型的发展背景、量表指标的设置与权值设置、适用性以及优缺点几个方面进行综合比较,得出各评价模型的差异性所在。研究发现,差异性最明显之处在于各评价模型的量表设置及适用性不同评价模型的测量过程和测量结果的侧重点是不同的。 Through literatures surveying, we found that the current evaluation models of library readers satisfaction are mainly built based on SERVQUAL,LibQUAL + TM,Rodski Group,AHP and ACSI. This paper makes a comprehensive comparison among these models from their backgrounds, scale set, weight set, applicability as well as advantages and disadvantages. Then we can get the dissimilarities among these evaluation models. In the research, we find that the most obvious dissimilarities are their scales and applicability; Different evaluation models have different focuses in the measurement process and results.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第14期50-55,133,共7页 Library and Information Service
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"云计算环境下图书馆的信息服务等级协议研究"(项目编号:71173163)研究成果之一
关键词 读者满意度 评价模型 评价量表 差异性 readers satisfaction degree evaluation model evaluation scale dissimilarities
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Hernon P, Nitecki D A, Altman E. Service quality and customersatisfaction: An assessment and future directions [ J ]. Journal of Academc Librarianship, 1999, 25 ( 1 ) :9 - 17.
  • 2张翔,万华.CS理论与图书馆管理初探[J].图书馆建设,2000(3):11-13. 被引量:45
  • 3郭强,赵瑾,刘思源,张芳,刘新新.图书馆读者满意度的基本计量规律研究[J].情报科学,2009,27(7):1021-1026. 被引量:4
  • 4Parasuraman A, Zeithaml Va, Berry L L. Servqual-a muhiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality [ J ]. Journal of Retailing, 1988, 64 ( 1 ) : 12 - 40.
  • 5Parasuraman A, Berry L L, Zeithaml Va. Refinement and reassessment of the servoqual Scale [ J ]. Journal of Retailing,1991, 67(4) :420 -450.
  • 6Parasuraman A, Zeithami Va, Berry L L. Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality- Implications for further research [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58(1) :111 -124.
  • 7Nitecki D A. Changing the concept and measure of service quality in academic libraries [ J 1. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1996,22(3) :181 - 190.
  • 8许玲,王利,周从军.面向全面质量管理——用SERVQUAL评价图书馆服务质量[J].图书情报工作,2001,45(5):76-79. 被引量:33
  • 9常唯.LibQUAL+^(TM)——图书馆服务质量评价方法新进展[J].大学图书馆学报,2003,21(4):23-26. 被引量:104
  • 10Thompson B, Cook C, Thompson R L. Reliability and structure of LibQUAL + ( TM ) scores: Measuring perceived library servicequality [ J]. Portal-Libraries and the Academy, 2002, 2 (1) :3 -12.

二级参考文献102

共引文献350

同被引文献81

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部