期刊文献+

从动态博弈视角谈碳排放权价格形成与策略选择

Talking about Price Formation of Carbon Emissions Rights from Dynamic Game and Strategy Selection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用罗宾斯泰英的轮流叫价谈判模型对碳排放权价格的形成进行分析,得出如下结论:碳排放权价格的唯一子博弈精炼纳什均衡结果取决于碳排放权买卖双方的耐心程度。而耐心程度取决于碳排放权的相对稀缺程度、流动性、碳排放权交易达不成时买卖双方的损失、碳排放权买卖双方的实力。在此基础上,探讨改善我国碳排放权价格劣势地位的策略。 This paper analyss the formation of prices of carbon emission rights, applying Rubinstein's turns bid negotiation model, and draws the following conclusions: only subgame perfect Nash equilibrium outcome of carbon emission rights prices depends on the patience degree of seller and buyer of the carbon emissions rights. The patience degree depends on the relative scarcity of carbon emission rights, liquidity, loss of buyer and seller when carbon emissions trading fail, the strength of buyer and seller of carbon emission rights. On this basis, the paper discussed strategies to improve disadvantage of our carbon emission rights price.
作者 王月欣
机构地区 中央民族大学
出处 《生态经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期58-60,105,共4页 Ecological Economy
基金 中央民族大学"211工程" "985工程"研究成果
关键词 碳排放权价格 动态博弈 策略 prices of carbon emission rights dynamic game strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Sijm J P M, Bakker S J, Chen Y, et al. CO2 Pirce Dynamics: The Implications of EU Emissions Trading for the Price of Electricity [R]. ECN Policy Studies, September, 2005.
  • 2Fehr M, Hinz J. A Quantitative Approach to Carbon Price Risk Modeling [R]. Institute of Operations Research, ETH Zurich, 2006.
  • 3Uhrig-Homburg M, Wagner M. Derivatives Instruments in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme - An Early Market Perspective [J]. Energy & Environment, 2008, 19: 635-655.
  • 4Benz E, Truck S. Modeling the Price Dynamics of CO2 Emission Allowances [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 31: 5-6.
  • 5Daskalakis G, Psychoyios D, Markellos R N. Modeling CO2 Emission Allowance Prices and Derivatives: Evidence from the EEX[R]. ERIM Report Series ERS-2005-052-F&A, 2006.
  • 6Daskalakis G, Psychoyios D, Markellos R N. Modeling CO2 Emission Allowance Prices and Derivatives: Evidence from the European Trading Scheme [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2009, 33: 1230-1241.
  • 7张艳林,孙永广,刘德顺.碳减排量定价理论研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002,22(4):105-108. 被引量:18
  • 8王璟珉,岳杰,魏东.期权理论视角下的企业内部碳交易机制定价策略研究[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(2):86-94. 被引量:6
  • 9王晟,刘青青,霍恺欣.基于影子价格的碳排放权交易价格机制探析[J].现代商贸工业,2011,23(10):165-165. 被引量:4
  • 10关丽娟,乔晗,赵鸣,龙琼华.我国碳排放权交易及其定价研究——基于影子价格模型的分析[J].价格理论与实践,2012(4):83-84. 被引量:27

二级参考文献25

  • 1徐瑾,万威武.排污权交易体系两种基本模式的比较[J].云南环境科学,2001,20(3):22-25. 被引量:8
  • 2徐玉高.全球气候变化国际合作机制研究[M].北京:清华大学,1997..
  • 3Heller, T. , The Path to EU Climate Change Policy, In : Golub, J. ( Ed), Global Competition and EU Environmental Policy. Rutledge, London, 1998: 108-141.
  • 4Bardc, J. P. , Environmental Policy and Policy Instruments. In: Eolmer, H. Principals of Environmental and Resource Economics. Edward Elnar, Aldershot, 1995: 30-65.
  • 5Palmisano, J. , Air Permit Trading Paradigms for Greenhouse Gases: Why Allowances wont work and credits will, Discussion Draft (Personal view), Enron Europe Lid, London, 1996: 128-145.
  • 6Heyes, A. , DijksLra, B. , The Political Economy of the Environment. Draft Paper 17 October. 1999, University of London, Royal Holloway College, Enham, 1999: 88-89.
  • 7[美]泰坦伯格,崔卫国等译:《初始排放权交易--污染控制政策的改革》,北京:三联书店出版社,1992年,第120-121页.
  • 8Boemare C. , Quirion P. , Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe: lessons from economic literature and international experiences, Ecological Economics, 2002, (43) : 213-230.
  • 9Klemperer P. Auction theory: a guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 1999, 13 (3) : 227-286.
  • 10Cason T N. , Seller Incentive Properties of EPA: Emission Trading Auction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1993, 25(2) :177-195.

共引文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部