期刊文献+

政治关系、企业超额贷款与大股东资金侵占——来自中国家族上市公司的证据 被引量:10

Political Relationship,Excess Credit and Controlling Shareholder's Funds Embezzlement——The Evidence from Chinese Stock Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 民营企业的政治关系作为一种替代性的非正式机制,在改进民营企业融资和促进民营企业发展方面发挥了积极作用。已有文献着重研究政治关系对资源配置结构的影响,但较少关注相应的效率问题。本文以我国2007~2009年家族上市公司为样本,实证检验政治关系对企业超额贷款形成以及大股东资金侵占的影响,从资金使用角度对政治关系与信贷资源配置效率的关系进行研究。研究结果表明,在我国银行业普遍存在"所有制歧视"的局面下,某些家族企业仍然获得了超额银行贷款,并且企业高管的政治背景强化了超额贷款的形成。但是,从家族企业债务融资的动机看,企业借助政治关联谋取超额贷款的行为并不是为了发挥债务的治理效应,而是为了控制更多的资源,以为其侵占行为提供便利。本文还发现,有政治关联的企业更可能发生侵占行为。 According to former researches,the political relation of private enterprises can be served as an informal substitute mechanism to lessen the obstruction caused by the backward system to the growth of private enterprises and to help private firms gain bank loan supports to spur their development.But they pay more attention to the relationship between political connection and the allocation of economic resources,and less attention to corresponding efficiency.Based on the sample of Family-controlled enterprises listed from 2007 to 2009,this paper examine the impact of political relation on the accessibility of excess credit and controlling shareholder's embezzlement of listed company's fund.The authors find that,facing the credit crunch,some family-controlled enterprises still obtain excess loans,and political affiliated executives aggravate the formation of excess credit;further study indicates that the motivation of family-enterprises which strive for excess credit is to control more resources so as to encroaching company's fund,rather than taking advantage of credit governance.The authors also find that controlling shareholders with political connection are more likely to encroach.
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期76-85,共10页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费(CDJSK100064) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJC790103)
关键词 政治关联 超额信贷 资金侵占 political relationship excess credit funds encroachment
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1Mauro P. Corruption and Growth [ J ].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995,110:681-712.
  • 2Demirguc-Kunt A, V.Maksimovic, Institutions,Financial Markets and Firm Debt Maturity [ J ].Journal of Financial Economics, 1999,54:295-336.
  • 3Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A,Makaimovic V.Financial and Legal Constraints to Growth:Does Firm Size matter [J].Journal of finance, 2005,70:137-177.
  • 4Claessens S, Laeven L.Financial Development, Property Rights and Growth [J ].Journal of Finance, 2003, 58:2401-2436.
  • 5Cull R, Xu LC.Institutions, Ownership and Finance:The Determinants of Profit Reinvestment among Chinese Firms[ J ].Journal of Financial Economics, 2005,77:117-146.
  • 6La Porta R,Lopez-de-Silanes F,Shleifer A,Vishny R.Law and Finance[J].The Journal of Polotical Economy, 1998,106(6): 1113-1155.
  • 7La Porta R,Lopez-de-Silanes F,Shleifer A,Vishny R.Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation [J].The Journal of Finance, 2002,57(3): 1147-1170.
  • 8Park SH,Luo Y.Guanxi and Organizational Dynamics:Organizational Networing in Chinese Firms [J].Strategic Management Journal, 2001,22:455-477.
  • 9朱凯,陈信元.银行腐败与公司资本结构决策[J].金融研究,2007(01A):28-40. 被引量:26
  • 10吴文锋,吴冲锋,刘晓薇.中国民营上市公司高管的政府背景与公司价值[J].经济研究,2008,43(7):130-141. 被引量:502

二级参考文献556

共引文献4903

同被引文献264

引证文献10

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部