期刊文献+

LMAsupreme^TM喉罩与气管插管静脉全麻在腹腔镜直肠癌切除手术中的应用 被引量:1

Application of LMA supreme^TM and Tracheal Tubes Undergoing Rectal Cancer Surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨LMAsupreme ^TM喉罩和气管插管静脉全麻两种方法用于腹腔镜直肠癌切除手术时对患者血流动力学、呼吸参数变化及术中术后不良反应发生率的影响,评估LMAsupreme^TM喉罩在腹腔镜直肠癌切除术中应用的安全性及优越性。方法:选择腹腔镜直肠癌切除手术患者40例,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,随机分成2组,即LMAsupreme^TM喉罩组(s组)和气管插管组(T组),每组20例。麻醉诱导后分别插入LMAsupreme^TM喉罩和气管插管,记录并比较两组在麻醉诱导前、喉罩和气管导管插入前即刻及插入后即刻、1min和5min时收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、心率(HR)。记录建立二氧化碳(CO2)气腹前、后和体位改变后气道平台压(Pplat)、气道峰压(Ppeak);观察手术过程中返流误吸、术后声嘶、咽痛、呛咳不良反应。结果:与T组比较,S组血流动力学平稳(P〈0.05),呼吸参数稳定变化小(P〈0.05),术中发生返流误吸无统计学差异,术后声嘶、咽痛、呛咳显著减少(P〈0.05)。结论:LMAsupremeTM喉罩在腹腔镜直肠癌切除术中应用能达到与气管导管同样的通气效果,对麻醉过程中血流动力学、呼吸参数影响更小,术中术后不良反应显著减少,且操作简单、易学,与气管插管方法相比在临床应用有更好的安全性及优越性。 Objective:To investigate the variations of hemodynamics or respiratory parameters and post- operative complication incidence in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery to perform the supreme LMA and Tracheal Tubes and to assess the safety or superiority. Methods: Forty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱrade patients underwent rectal cancer surgery were randomly divided into two groups: Supreme LMA group( S), Tracheal Tube group (T). Patients were intubated with supreme LMA, Tracheal Tube respectively after general anesthesia was induced with mid- azolam 0.05 mg/kg, fentanyl 2 μg/kg, etomidate 0.3 mg/kg and vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg. Record and count baseline or variable valus on systonic pressure, dystonic pressure, heart rate, peak inspiration pressure, fiat in- spiration pressure as pre - and post - pneumoperitoneum, head down tilt. To observe intra - and post - opera- tion complication on backflow or aspiration, pharyngodynia, trachyphonia, irritating cough. Results:The hemo- dynamic during intubation and respiratory parameters were more stable in group S than in group T ( P 〈 0.05 ). There were no differences on backflow or aspiration during intraoperation between two groups. Postoperation in- cidences were significantly lower in group S than group T on trachyphonia, pharyngalgia or bucking( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions:LMA supremeTMventilation is effective as well as tracheal tube in rectal cancer surgery. It impacts little variations of hemodynamics or respiratory parameters after general anesthesia and reduces incidence of complications significantly compared with T group. In addition, the method is simple. LMA supremeTM is safer and superior to tracheal tubes on clinical applications.
出处 《解剖与临床》 2013年第4期316-319,共4页 Anatomy and Clinics
关键词 SUPREME喉罩 气管插管 直肠癌手术 腹腔镜 LMA supreme ^TM Tracheal tubes Rectal cancer surgery Laparoscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1李彦轩,庄振然.Supreme喉罩在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2011,43(8):957-958. 被引量:2
  • 2段宏军,贾瑞芳,左明章.Supreme喉罩用于腹腔镜手术患者气道管理的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2010,30(3):341-343. 被引量:34
  • 3Cook TM, Gupta K, Gabbott DA, et al. An evaluation of the airway management device. Anesthesiology, 2001,56(7) :660 -664.
  • 4李彩霞,沈霞,陈莲华.喉罩通气在小儿斜视矫正术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2010,26(4):307-309. 被引量:19
  • 5王小虎,熊贤俊,傅志海,吴雅松.CO_2气腹及体位对LMA Supreme喉罩套囊压力的影响[J].中国现代医药杂志,2012,14(8):21-23. 被引量:4
  • 6Yao WY, Li SY, Song BL, et al. The LMA supremeTM in 700 parturi- ents undergoing Cesarean delivery: an observational study Canadian Journal of Anesthesia ,2012,59(7) :648 -654.
  • 7Keller C, Brimacombe J, Biuemohl J, et al. Aspiration and the la- ryngeal mask airway: three cases and areview of the literature. Br J Anaesth, 2004, 93(4): 579-582.
  • 8Skinner H J, Mahajan RP. Gastro -oesophageal reflux during day case gynaecological laparoscopy under positive pressure ventilation: laryngeal mask vs. tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia, 1998, 80(5) : 675 - 676.
  • 9Stewart A, Lindsay WA. Bilateral hypoglossal nerve injury following the use of the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia,2002,57 (3) :264 - 265.
  • 10Bruce IA, Ellis R, Kay NJ. Nerve injury and the laryngeal mask air- way. J Laryngol Otol, 2004, 118(11) : 899 -901.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Holm-Knudsen RJ, Rasmussen LS. Paediatric airway mangagement : basic aspects. Acta Anaesthesial Scand, 2009,53 : 1- 9.
  • 2Choi SJ, Gwak MS, Ko JS, et al. The effects of the exaggerated lithotonmy position for radical perineal prostatectomy on re spiratory mechanics. Aneasthesia, 2006,61 : 439- 443.
  • 3Sung A, Kalstein A, Radhakrishnan P, et al. laryngeal mask airway:use and clinical application. J Bronchol, 2007, 14:181- 188.
  • 4Szmuk P,Ghelber O, Matuszczak M,et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of eobro perilaryngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway unique in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg, 2008,107 : 1523-1530.
  • 5Westhorpe RN, Ludbrook GL, Helps SC. Crisis management during anaesthesia: bronchospasm. Qual Saf Health Care, 2005,14:e7.
  • 6Reissmann H, Pothmann W, Fullekrug B, et al. Resistance of laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube in mechanically venti lated patients. Br J Anaesth,2000,85:410- 416.
  • 7Kleine-Brueggeney M, Theiler LG, Luyet C, et al. Aeule airway obstruction caused by the new single use Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme. Anesthesiology, 2009,110 : 189-190.
  • 8Wahlen BM, Heinrichs W, Latorre F. Gastric insufflation pressure,air leakage and respiratory mechanics in the use of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in children. Pediatr Anaesth, 2004,14:313-317.
  • 9Pazanin L, Misak VB,Goreta N, et al. latrogenic tracheal laceration causing asphyxia. J Forensic Sci, 2008,53 : 1185-1187.
  • 10Timmermaim A,Creiner S,Heuer J,et al.Laiyngeal mask LMA Supreme.Application by medical personnel inexperienced in airway management.Anaesthesist,2008,57(10):970-975.

共引文献55

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部