期刊文献+

LightsheerDuet半导体激光脱毛的临床疗效 被引量:4

Clinical efficacy of hair removal by using Lightsheer Duet diode laser
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨LightsheerDuet半导体激光对不同部位脱毛的疗效及安全性,比较大激光孔高速手具及标准手具两种模式脱腋毛效果的差异性。方法使用LightsheerDuet半导体激光脱毛仪对200例要求脱毛治疗者的不同部位进行脱毛治疗,4~8周治疗1次,4次为1个疗程。观察治疗后的疗效及不良反应。选取其中30例腋下脱毛者,采取自身左右对照方式治疗,即左侧腋下采用高速手具、右侧腋采用标准手具进行治疗,观察疗效有无差异。结果200例脱毛治疗者经过4次治疗后毛发较治疗前明显减少,总有效率达95.45%,且随治疗次数的增加,总有效率相应增高。3例出现色素沉着,均在治疗后1~3个月内消退。30例腋下脱毛者中,两种治疗手具3次脱腋毛治疗后总有效率均为100%,两者差异无统计学意义,高速手具脱毛疼痛更轻微。结论LightsheerDuet半导体激光脱毛是安全、高效的脱毛方法,其中的高速手具操作更快速、舒适。 Objective To evaluate the efficiency and safety of hair removal in different areas with Lightsheer Duet diode laser and to compare clinical effect and safety in axillae hair removal be- tween the two models, high-speed and standard model. Methods Lightsheer Duet diode laser was used to remove hairs from different areas in 200 cases, for 4-8 weeks treatment 1 time, 4 times for 1 course. The curative effect and adverse reaction were observed after the treatment. Thirty axillae hair removal subjects were chosen randamly and received treatments using the different models, high-speed hand piece on one side and the standard hand piece on the other side. Hair removal efficiency and the immediate pain were compared and evulated on each subject. Results The hair was significantly re- duced after 4 times treatments in 200 cases. The total effective rate was 95. 54% and positively related with the treatment times. Pigmentation was found in 3 cases, but it disappeared after 1-3 months. The total effective rate was 100 % after the 3 times treatments in axillae hair removal sub- jects both using the high-speed model or the standard model in 30 cases. There was no statistical difference between the two models except less pain in the high-speed model. Conclusions Lightsheer Duet diode laser is a safe and efficient method in hair removal. The high-speed model has more advan- tage on speed and causing pain.
出处 《中华医学美学美容杂志》 2013年第4期271-274,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology
关键词 脱毛 半导体激光 Hair removal Diode laser
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献14

  • 1徐慧,陈向东,汪蓓青,韩宝兰,刘健航.半导体激光脱毛的临床疗效及安全性评价[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2005,19(8):505-506. 被引量:11
  • 2孙林潮,高天文.激光脱毛术∥高天文,孙林潮.美容激光医学.北京:人民军医出版社,2004:41.
  • 3Tierney EP, Goldberg DJ. Laser hair removal pearls. Cosmet Laser Ther, 2008,10(1) :17-23.
  • 4Goldberg DJ.激光与光.周展超,译.北京:人民军医出版社,2007:61.
  • 5Choudhary S, Elsaie ML, Nouri K. Laser assisted hair-removal. G Ital Dermatol Venereol, 2009,144(5): 595-602.
  • 6Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Long-pulsed(1064 nm) Nd : YAG laser assisted hair removal in all skin types. Dermatol Surg, 2004,30 (1):13-17.
  • 7EL BEDEWI AF. Hair removal with intense pulsed light [J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2004,19( 1 ) :48-51.
  • 8WHEELAND RG. Simulated consumer use of a battery-powered, hand-held, portable diode laser (810 nm) for hair removal :A safety, efficacy and ease-of-use study [J]. Lasers Surg Med,2007,39(6):476- 493.
  • 9ANDERSON RR, PARRISH JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation [J ].Science, 1983,220( 4596 ) : 524-527.
  • 10BOUZARI N,TABATABAI H,ABBASI Z, et al. Hair removal using an 800-nm diode laser:comparison at different treatment intervals of 45,60, and 90 days[J]. Int J Dermatol, 2005,44( 1 ) : 50-53.

共引文献25

同被引文献40

  • 1胡光珍,禹卉千,李振鲁.810nm半导体激光脱毛疗效观察[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2007,21(10):636-637. 被引量:12
  • 2Li ZR, Sun CW, Zhang JY, et al. Excision of apocrine glands with preservation of axiIlary superficial fascia for the treatment of axillary bromhidrosis[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2015,41 (5) :640-644.
  • 3de Almeida AR, Montagner S. Botulinum toxin for axillary hyper- hidrosis [J]. Dermatol Clin, 2014,32 (4) :495-504.
  • 4RoseU K, Hymnelius K, Swartling C. Botulinum toxin type A and B improve quality of life in patients with axillary and palmar hyper- hidrosis[J]. Acta Derm Venereol, 2013,93(3) :335-339.
  • 5Glaser DA, Galperin TA. Botulinum toxin for hyperhidrosis of areas other than the axillae and palms/soles [ J ]. Dermatol Clin, 2014,32(4) :517-515.
  • 6Goh CL. Comparative study on a single treatment response to long pulse Nd:YAG lasers and intense pulse light therapy for hair removal on skin type Ⅳ to VI-is longer wavelengths lasers preferred over shorter wave- lengths lights for assisted hair removal [ J ]. J Dermatolog Treat, 2003, 14(4) :243 -247.
  • 7Williams R, Havoonjian H, Isagholian K, et al. A clinical study of hair removal using the long-pulsed ruby laser[J]. Demznatol Surg, 1998, 24 (8) :837 -842.
  • 8Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis:precise microsur- gery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation [ J ]. Science, 1983, 220 (4596) :524 -527.
  • 9Klein A, Steinert S, Baeumler W, et al. Photoepilation with a diode la- ser vs. intense pulsed light : a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial [ J ]. Br J Dematol, 2013, 168 (6) : 1287 - 1293.
  • 10Braun M. Permanent laser hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate versus high fluence low repetition rate 810 nm diode laser-a split leg comparison study [ J ]. J Drugs Dermatol, 2009, 8 ( 11 Suppl) : s14 - 17.

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部