期刊文献+

改进吸痰法在气管插管机械通气患者中的应用效果观察 被引量:7

Effect of improved suction on patients undergoing mechanical ventilation via tracheal incubation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨改进吸痰法在气管插管机械通气患者中的应用效果观察。方法将行气管插管机械通气的120例患者,按照随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组,每组各60例,试验组采用改进吸痰法,包括气管导管内(浅部)吸痰、气管导管外(深部)及气囊上方吸痰3部分;对照组采用常规吸痰法。两周后观察两组患者气道黏膜损伤及呼吸机相关性肺炎(ventilator-associated pneumonia,VAP)的发生情况。结果试验组和对照组患者气道黏膜损伤发生率比较,差异具有统计学意义(1.7%vs16.7%,χ2=8.107,P<0.01);试验组和对照组患者VAP的发生率比较,差异具有统计学意义(3.3%vs18.3%,χ2=6.988,P<0.01)。结论改进吸痰法在气管插管机械通气患者中的应用,不仅降低了患者气道黏膜的损伤,同时还降低了VAP的发生,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the effect of improved suction on patients undergoing mechanical ventilation via tracheal incubation.Methods One hundred and twenty ICU patients undergoing mechanical ventilation via tracheal incubation were divided into the experiment group and the control group by the randomized digital table,60 patients in each group.The experiment group received the improved suction which included superficial suction in the tracheal tube,deep suction outside the tracheal tube and suction in the upper balloon.The control group received the conventional suction.Then we observed the incidence of airway mucosa damage and ventilator-associated pneumonia across the two groups after two weeks.Results The incidence rate of airway mucosa damage was 1.7% in the experiment group,which was significantly lower than that of 16.7% in the control group(χ2=8.107,P 0.01).The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia was 3.3% in the experiment group,which was significantly lower than that of 18.3% in the control group(χ2=6.988,P 0.01).Conclusions The improved suction may not only decrease the damage of airway mucosa,but also reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.Therefore,it’s worthy of clinically spreading.
出处 《现代临床护理》 2013年第4期60-62,共3页 Modern Clinical Nursing
基金 2012年广东省湛江市非资助科技攻关计划课题 项目编号为2012C3105048
关键词 气管插管 机械通气 呼吸机相关性肺炎 吸痰法 tracheal incubation mechanical ventilation ventilatorassociated pneumonia suction
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献92

共引文献113

同被引文献73

  • 1范关荣,陈宗南,葛 文,杨海慧,冯卓荣.二种吸痰方法的对比研究[J].上海生物医学工程,2004,25(4):19-21. 被引量:11
  • 2张振平,赵改凤,张春民,马传根.应用冲洗式气管导管囊上分泌物吸引预防VAP的价值[J].中国急救医学,2005,25(5):373-375. 被引量:55
  • 3Medina J.Prospective study of risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by acinetobacter species[J].J Crit Care,2007,22 (1):18-26.
  • 4Efrati S, Deutsch I,Gabriel M, et al. Endotracheal tube cuff- small important part of a big issue[J]. Journal Clinical Monito- ring and Computing,2012,26(1):53-60.
  • 5Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing and Mid- wifery. Tracheal suctioning of adults with an artificial airway [R]. Adelaide : Joanna Briggs Institute, 2000,4 (4) : 1-6.
  • 6Trevisanuto D, Doglioni N, Zanardo V. The management of endotracheal tubes and nasal cannulae: The role of nurses[J]. Early Human Development, 2009,85 (16) : 85-87.
  • 7PEEP Choong K, Chartkaw P, Frndova H, et al. Comparison of loss in lung volume with open versus in-line catheter endo- tracheal suctioning[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2003,4 (1) : 69-73.
  • 8American Association for Respiratory Care. AARC clinical prac- tice guidelines: endotracheal suctioning of mechanically venti- lated patients with artificial airways 2010 [ J ]. Respiratory Care, 2010, 55 (6): 758-764.
  • 9Pedersen CM, Rosendahl - Nielsen M, Hjermind J, et al. Endotracheal suctioning of the adult intubated patient-- what is the evidence? [J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2009, 25 (1): 21-30.
  • 10Steven Deem, Miriam M. New endotracheal tubes designed to prevent ventilator - associated pneumonia: do they make a difference [J]. Repir care, 2010, 55 (8): 1046-1055.

引证文献7

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部