期刊文献+

对我国治理通货膨胀成本的再估计——基于三种SVAR模型的比较分析

The re-estimation of the cost about managing inflation in our country——A relative analysis based on three kinds of SVAR model
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了准确估计我国治理通胀过程中付出的成本—牺牲率,在理性预期的假设下,首先将凯恩斯主义之IS-LM-PC模型的增长率形式表示成一种特殊的SVAR模型,并根据中国1993年第三季度到2011年第四季度的数据,分别基于Shapiro&Watson(1988)、Cecchetti(2001)和本文构建的三种SVAR模型得到牺牲率的点估计和区间估计。实证分析发现,利用季度数据和Cecchetti模型所得到的牺牲率点估计结果与前人研究结论基本一致。同时,本文使用自举方法模拟了牺牲率的经验分布,得到了牺牲率的区间估计。在90%的置信水平下,我国通货膨胀率降低一个百分点,实际产出的损失不超过3.86%.与前人的研究结果相比较,近年来中国经济的牺牲率明显扩大。 The objective of our country's economic policy has become to take precautions against inflation since 2008. It takes more than four years to implement the tight monetary policy, After May 2012 we realize this goal and make price to be stable. However, our economy suffered serious recession during this period. In order to estimate the cost that disinflation brings, that is sacrifice, this article, firstly, in the hypothesis of rational expectations, finds that Keynesian IS--LM--Phil- lips curve Model is a special SVAR model, which provides a theoretical basis for setting the SVAR model. Secondly, we derive point estimates of the sacrifice ratio and interval estimates of the sacri- fice ratio over the period 1993--2011, based on Shapiro g〉 Watson(1988), Cecchetti(2001) and model built by this paper. We obtain point estimates of the sacrifice ratio that are consistent with results reported in earlier studies and interval estimates of the sacrifiee ratio by its empirical distri- bution, based on parametric bootstraps. We conduct a 90~ confidence interval, suggesting that somewhere less than 3.86~ of GDP must be sacrificed for inflation to fall one percentage point. Compared with results of previous studies, the sacrifice ratio is significantly expanded.
出处 《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期36-43,共8页 Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
关键词 反通胀政策 牺牲率 结构向量自回归 参数自举 Disinflation policy Sacrifice ratio Structural Vector Autoregression Parametric bootstraps
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Arthur M. Okun. Efficient Disinflationary Policies[J]. American Econominc Review, 1978, (68): 348 -352.
  • 2RobertJ. Gordon and Stephen R. king. The Output Cost of Disinflation in Traditional and Vector Au?toregressive Models[J]. Brooking Paper on Econom?ic Activity,1982,(1): 205-245.
  • 3Mankiw , N. Gregory. A quick refresher course in macroeconomics[J].Journal of Economic Literature, 1990, (28): 1645 -1660.
  • 4Andersen P Sand W L Wascher. Sacrifice ratios and the conduct of monetary policy in conditions of low inflation[J]. Bank of International Settlements, 1999,(82).
  • 5FilardoJ A. New evidence on the output cost of fighting inflation[J]. Federal Reserve Bank of Kan?sas City Economic Review 3rd quarter, 1998,33 - 61.
  • 6Cunado ,J. &. de Gracia, F. P. Sacrifice Ratios: Some Lessons from [MU Countries, 1960 - 2001[] J. International Review of Applied Economics, 2003, (17): 327-337.
  • 7Ball, L. What Determines the Sacrifice Ratio?[M]. Monetary Policy. University of Chicago: 1994, 155 -1931.
  • 8Zhang, L. H. Sacrifice ratios with long-lived effects[J]. International Finance,2005, (8) :231-262.
  • 9舒元,黄新飞.中国牺牲率的估算及其影响因素分析:基于国际比较的实证研究[J].统计研究,2006,23(5):64-69. 被引量:8
  • 10黄新飞,舒元.基于HP滤波分析的中国牺牲率的长期影响研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010,27(3):119-132. 被引量:16

二级参考文献43

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部