期刊文献+

为海德格尔的“形而上学”辩护——驳卡尔纳普

原文传递
导出
摘要 卡尔纳普对海德格尔哲学的拒斥至今仍然影响着许多分析哲学家和科学哲学家,本文从以下几个方面来反驳卡尔纳普:首先,海德格尔哲学并不是形而上学的典型代表,倒是要克服形而上学,只是克服的方向与卡尔纳普相反;其次,卡尔纳普在名词的动词化以及"无"的问题上完全误解了海德格尔;再次,卡尔纳普对to be问题的否定以及用艺术代替海德格尔哲学的企图等是科学主义的、独断的和简单化的。
作者 李章印
出处 《世界哲学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期106-113,共8页 World Philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1李章印.海德格尔对科学与哲学关系的思考[J].自然辩证法研究,2001,17(6):5-8. 被引量:6
  • 2Rudolf Carnap, "The Overcoming of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language", in Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays, edited by Michael Murray, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1978, p. 31.
  • 3Rudolf Carnap, "The Overcoming of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language", in Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays, edited by Michael Murray, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1978, p.24-25.
  • 4Rudolf Carnap, "The Overcoming of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language", in Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays, pp. 24 -25.
  • 5Rudolf Carnap, "The Overcoming of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language", in Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays, p. 29.
  • 6Rudolf Carnap, "The Overcoming of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language", in Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays, p. 26.
  • 7Martin Heidegger, "What Is Metaphysics?" (1929), in Martin Heidegger, Pathmarks, edited by William McNeill, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, p. 85.
  • 8Rudolf Carnap, "The Overcoming of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language", in Heidegger and Modern Philosophy:Critical Essays, p. 26.
  • 9Rudolf Carnap, "The Overcoming of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language", in Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays.
  • 10Rudolf Carnap, "The Overcoming of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language", in Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays.pp.28-29.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部