4Pierce DA, Sharp GB,Mahuch K.Joint effects of radiation and anoking on Lung cancer risk among atomic bomb survivors[J].Ra- diat Res,2005,163(6):694-695.
5Pierce DA,Shinizu Y. Selection bias in cancer risk estimation fron A-bomb survivors [J].RadiatRes,2007.167(6):735-741.
6Preston DL,fierce DA,Shinizu Y,et al.Effect of recent changes inatomic bomb survivor dosinetrv on cancer mortality risk esti- mates[J]. Radia Res,2004,162(4):377-389.
8Rusinek H.Naidich,Mc Guinness G,et al. P ulnonary nodule de- tection low-dose versus conventional CT[J].Radiology,1998,209(1): 243-249.
9Funama Y. Awai K,Nakavana Y, et al. Radiation dose reduction withlout degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdom inM- multisection CT with Mow-tube voltage technique phantom study [J].Radiology,2005,237(3):905-910.
10Dawson P.Patient dose in muhislice CT: why is it illcreasing and does it matte?[J]. Br J Radiol,2004,77:10-13.
4Scbonfeld SJ, Lee C, de GonzOiez AB. Medical exposure to radiation and thyroid cancer[ J ]. Clin Oncol, 2011,23 ( 4 ) : 244- 250. DOI: 10. 1016/j. clon. 2011. 01.159.
5Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, et al. Estimated risks of radiation- induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [ J ]. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 2001,176(2):289-296. DOI: 10.2214/AJR. 176. 2. 1760289.
6Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study [J] AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 193 (3):764-771. DOI: 10. 2214/AJR. 09. 2397.
