真理同一论:自明之理? 被引量：1

下载PDF

导出

摘要对于被认为是符合论在当代最主要的批评者之一的真理同一论,麦克道威尔和多德等人虽然对它的理解并不相同,但都认为它是自明之理。对此观点,本文试图通过考察麦克道威尔关于真理同一论的思想,以及他与多德及其他一些哲学家围绕"自明之理"对真理同一论展开的争论,而意图表明,这些哲学家所提供的真理同一论都不可接受。

作者李主斌

机构地区复旦大学哲学学院

出处《江苏社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期114-119,共6页 Jiangsu Social Sciences

基金复旦大学"985工程"三期整体推进人文学科研究项目的资助(项目批准号:2011RWXKY-041)

关键词麦克道威尔真理同一论事实

分类号 B84 [哲学宗教—心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1McDowell, Mind and World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996, p.27, p.27, p.27, p.26.
2Dodd, McDowell and Identity Theories of Truth, Analysis, Vol.55, pp.160-165, 1995.
3Candlish, S. and Damnjanovic, Nic., The Identity Theo- ry of Truth, available online: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-i-dentity/, 2011.
4Frege, G., The Thought: An Logical Inquiry, Mind, vol. 65, pp. 289-311, 1918.
5Engel, P.,The False Modesty of the Identity Theory of Truth, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol.9(4), pp.441-458, 2001.
6McDowell, J., Response, in his Reason and Nature, M. Willaschek (ed.), Munster: LIT Verlag, 1999, pp.93-94.
7McDowell, J., The True Modesty of an I- dentity Conception of Truth: A Note in Response to Pascal Engel (2001), International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol.13, pp. 83-88, 2005.
8Shum, C., Wagemann, P. and Wessels, F. , Ontologi- cal troubles with facts and objects in McDowell's Mind and World, In John McDowell: Reason and Nature, edited by M. Willaschek, Miinster: LIT Verlag, 1999, pp.27-33.
9Fish, W. and Macdonald, C., The Identity Theory of Truth and the Realm of Reference: Where Dodd Goes Wrong, Analysis, Vol.69, pp.297-304, 2009.
10Fish, W. and Macdonald, C., On McDowell's Identity Conception of Truth, Analysis, Vol.67, pp.36-41, 2007.