期刊文献+

基于直觉模糊多属性决策的公路工程评标方法 被引量:4

Bid Evaluation Method of Highway Engineering Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision Making
原文传递
导出
摘要 公路工程评标定标问题的实质是多属性决策问题,专家对参评标书给出了各指标的区间直觉模糊属性值和属性权重的部分信息后,先定义了区间直觉模糊数的得分函数及标准得分差,进而提出了一种基于线性规划模型的区间直觉模糊多属性决策方法,最后通过实例对该决策途径的详细过程及有效性进行了说明. Bid evaluation of highway engineering in essence is an issue of multiple attribute decision making. After the partial information of the competed bids of the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy attribute value of each index and attribute weights is obtained from experts, the scored function and standard deviation of the number of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy are defined, and then a linear programming method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making is presented. Finally, the detailed process and validity of the road of decision making are explained by an illustrative example.
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第16期46-52,共7页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 国家自然科学基金(11201177) 吉首大学科研基金(Jd12034)
关键词 公路工程评标方法 区间直觉模糊数 直觉模糊集 得分函数 模糊多属性决策 evaluation method of highway engineering bid number of interval-valued intu-itionistic fuzzy intuitionistic fuzzy set scored function fuzzy multi-attribute decision making
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献71

共引文献109

同被引文献53

  • 1Zimmermann H J.Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications[M].Kluwer Academic Publishers,Boston,Dordrecht,London,1991.
  • 2Chen C T.Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,114:1-9.
  • 3中华人民共和国招投标法[M].北京:中国民主法制出版社,2001.
  • 4Singh D, Tiong R L K. Contractor selection criteria: investigation of opinions of Singapore construction practitioners [ J] Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2006, 132 (9): 998-1008.
  • 5Wong C H. Contractor performance prediction model for the United Kingdom construction contractor: study of logistic regression approach [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2004, 130 (5): 691-698.
  • 6Holt G. Contractor selection innovation: examination of two dec- ades'published research [ J 1. Construction Innovation: Informa- tion, Process, Management, 2010, 10 (3): 304-328.
  • 7Holt G D. Which contractor selection methodology? [ J ]. Inter- national Journal of Project Management, 1998, 16 (3 : 153-164.
  • 8Vahdani B, Mousavi S M, Hashemi H, et al. A new compromise solution method for fuzzy group decision-making problems with an application to the contractor selection [ J ]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2013, 26 (2): 779-788.
  • 9Ho W, Xu X, Dey P K. Multi-criteria decision making approaches fur supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review [ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 202 (1): 16-24.
  • 10Saaty T 1 The Analytic Hierarchy Process [ M ] New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部