期刊文献+

提升商学院大学生的学习投入探究——基于专业承诺的学习心理视角 被引量:9

Improving Academic Engagement for Undergraduates in Business School——A perspective of major commitment in learning psychology
原文传递
导出
摘要 从学习心理的视角切入,运用课堂观察法和访谈法调查了商学院大学生在学习投入的情感、行为和认知方面的现状,结果显示学习投入水平普遍较低。从专业承诺的继续、规范、情感和理想四维度出发,商学院大学生专业承诺特点的调查结果显示,继续承诺水平最高,规范承诺和情感承诺次之,理想承诺最低。专业承诺可以通过四大维度对商学院学生的学习投入产生影响,当承诺水平不一致时,学生的学习投入就低。鉴此,可以通过四大策略提升商学院大学生的学习投入水平。 From the angle of learning psychology, the paper investigates the academic engagement situation of business school undergraduates by emotional, behavioral and cognitive dimensions with classroom observation and individual interviewing methods. It shows the academic engagement is generally at a low level. From the continuance, normative, affective and ideal dimensions, the characteristics of major commitment for business school undergraduates are studied. It finds that continuance commitment is at the first place; normative commitment and affective commitment are at the next; ideal commitment is at the last. Academic engagement of business school undergraduates is believed to be affected by four dimensions of major commitment. When the commitments are not at the consistent levels, the undergraduates are inclined to pay less academic engagement. Four strategies are discussed to improve the academic engagement for business school undergraduates.
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期94-98,共5页 China Higher Education Research
关键词 专业承诺 学习投入 学习心理 商学院 major commitment academic engagement learning psychology business school
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Newman F. Student engagement and achievement inAmerican secondary schools [ M]. New York: TeachersCollege Press, 1992: 62-91.
  • 2Kindermann T A. Natural peer groups as contexts forindividual development: The case of children ’ s motivation inschool[J], Developmental Psychology, 1993(29): 970-977.
  • 3Klem A M, Connell J P. Relationships matter: Linkingteacher support to student engagement and achievement.Journal of School Health[J]. 2004,74(07): 262-273.
  • 4Schaufeli W B, Salanova M, Gonzalez-Roma V and BakkerA B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a twosample confirmatory factor analytic approach[J]. Journal ofHappiness Studies, 2002(03).
  • 5罗燕,史静寰,涂冬波.清华大学本科教育学情调查报告2009——与美国顶尖研究型大学的比较[J].清华大学教育研究,2009,30(5):1-13. 被引量:194
  • 6Helme S, Clarke D. Identifying cognitive engagement in themathematics classroom[J]. Mathematics EducationResearch, 2001, 13(02): 133-153.
  • 7Conchas G. Structuring failure and success: Understandingthe variability in Latino school engagementJ]. HarvardEducational Review, 2001, 71(03): 475-504.
  • 8Valeski T N, Stipek D. Young children’s feelings aboutschool[J]. Child Development, 2001, 73(04): 1198-2013.
  • 9薛锋.体育教育专业大学生的专业承诺研究[J].西北民族大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(4):77-84. 被引量:10
  • 10连榕,杨丽娴,吴兰花.大学生的专业承诺、学习倦怠的关系与量表编制[J].心理学报,2005,37(5):632-636. 被引量:1096

二级参考文献55

共引文献1735

同被引文献112

引证文献9

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部