期刊文献+

碳排放权初始分配结构下企业的成本-收益研究 被引量:2

An Analysis of Firm's Cost and Earning with Initial Distribution Methods of Tradable Carbon Permits Based on Market Economic System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从理论上分析了市场体制下,祖父继承法、竞价法和产出标准法三种普遍认同的碳排放权初始分配方式中,受控排放源企业的成本收益结构、产品最优价格、边际产出的碳损益以及企业净利润的波动比较。根据三种初始分配方式的特点,竞价法无疑是对企业利益损害最大的初始分配方式,产出标准法则能最好地实现行业企业优化,祖父继承法对所有企业一视同仁,企业没有额外负担也没有明显的补贴。 This article theoretically analyses the impact of three initial distribution methods of tradable carbon permits over involved firms, including the terms of cost and earning, best product price, net carbon income of each marginal product and firm' s added value. The three methods stud- ied here are grandfathering, auction and general performance standard. According to the features of the three initial distribution methods, auction, undoubtedly, is the one which brings maximum losses to enterprises, while, general performance standard can best realize optimization for industry and enterprises, and grandfathering gives equal treatment to all enterprises which have no extra burden or obvious subsidies.
作者 范德胜
出处 《南京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期24-29,7,共7页 Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
关键词 碳排放权 祖父继承法 竞价法 产出标准法 成本收益 tradable carbon permits initial distribution grandfathering auction general per- formance standard cost and earning
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1A. Denny Ellerman, Richard Schmalensee, Paul L. Joskow, Juan Pablo Montero, and Elizabeth M. Bailey. Emissions trading under the U. S. Acid Rain Program: evaluation of com- pliance costs and allowances market performance. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research Massachusetts Insti- tute of Technology.
  • 2Byron Swift (2000), Environmental Law Institute. Allowance trading and potential hot spots - good news from the Acid Rain Program. Environmental Reporter, vol. 31, No. 19, pp. 954- 959 (May 12).
  • 3Carolyn Fischer, Alan Fox(2004). Output-based allocations of emissions permits: Efficiency and distributional effects in a general equilibrium setting with taxes and trade. Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 04 - 37. December.
  • 4Curtis Carlson, Dallas Burtraw, Maureen Cropper, and Karen Palmer(2000), Sulfur Dioxide by electric utilities: what are the gains from trade? Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 98 - 44 - REV. April.
  • 5Georg Griill, Luca Taschini ( 2009 ). Cap - and - trade proper- ties under different scheme designs. Center for Energy and En- vironmental Policy Research. Novermber.
  • 6Hahn R W (1984). Market power and transferable property rights. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99 (10) : 753 -765.
  • 7Montgomery D W(1972). Markets in licenses and efficient pollu- tion control programs. Journal of Economic Theory, 5:395 -418.
  • 8Robert N. Stavins (1995). Transaction costs and tradeable permits. Journal of environmental economics and management 29,133 - 148.
  • 9Tietenberg TH(1985). Emission trading: an exercise in reforming pollution policy. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  • 10Zhao WH, Dai TS(2007). Study on the emergence of market power in emission right market. Proceeding of 2007 interna- tional conference on management science & engineering.

同被引文献24

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部