摘要
本文从理论上分析了市场体制下,祖父继承法、竞价法和产出标准法三种普遍认同的碳排放权初始分配方式中,受控排放源企业的成本收益结构、产品最优价格、边际产出的碳损益以及企业净利润的波动比较。根据三种初始分配方式的特点,竞价法无疑是对企业利益损害最大的初始分配方式,产出标准法则能最好地实现行业企业优化,祖父继承法对所有企业一视同仁,企业没有额外负担也没有明显的补贴。
This article theoretically analyses the impact of three initial distribution methods of tradable carbon permits over involved firms, including the terms of cost and earning, best product price, net carbon income of each marginal product and firm' s added value. The three methods stud- ied here are grandfathering, auction and general performance standard. According to the features of the three initial distribution methods, auction, undoubtedly, is the one which brings maximum losses to enterprises, while, general performance standard can best realize optimization for industry and enterprises, and grandfathering gives equal treatment to all enterprises which have no extra burden or obvious subsidies.
出处
《南京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第8期24-29,7,共7页
Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
碳排放权
祖父继承法
竞价法
产出标准法
成本收益
tradable carbon permits
initial distribution
grandfathering
auction
general per- formance standard
cost and earning