期刊文献+

伊曲康唑在异基因造血干细胞移植真菌感染预防中的应用

Itraconazole application for prevention of fungal infection in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨伊曲康唑在异基因造血干细胞移植患者侵袭性真菌感染预防中的疗效。方法 110例异基因造血干细胞移植患者,预防性应用伊曲康唑或氟康唑,观察两组患者发生侵袭性真菌感染的情况。结果随访至造血干细胞移植后180d,伊曲康唑组和氟康唑组侵袭性真菌感染的发生率分别为7.2%(5/69)和19.5%(8/41),二者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组真菌感染相关病死率(2.9%vs.7.3%)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);伊曲康唑的不良反应发生率较氟康唑高(26.9%vs.7.0%),但患者均能耐受。结论伊曲康唑预防用药可以显著降低异基因造血干细胞移植患者侵袭性真菌感染的发生率,是一种安全、有效的方法。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of itraconazole in prevention of invasive fungal infections in allogeneic hema- topoietic stem cell transplantion. Methods In this retrospective study, 110 patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants were administed itraconazole or fluconazole for prevention of fungal infection. The occurrence and prognosis of invasive fungal infection,and the side effect of both pyrroles were observed. Results Proven and probable invasive fungal infections occurred in 5 of 69 itraconazole recipients(7.2%) and in 8 of 41 fluconazole recipients(19.5 %) during the first 180 days after transplantation, the difference had statistical significance(P〈0.05). The fatality rate related to fungal infection had no statistical difference between the two groups(2.9 % vs. 7.3 %). The occurrence of itraconazole adverse reactions were more than fluconazole(26.9 % vs. 7.0%) ,and both itraconazole and flueonazole were well tolerated. Conclusion Itraconazole significantly reduces the incidence of invasive fungal infection in the patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants, and it is a effective and safe prophylaxis.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第25期2953-2954,2958,共3页 Chongqing medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81270605)
关键词 真菌感染 造血干细胞移植 伊曲康唑 fungal infection hematopoietic stem cell transplantation itraconazole
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Greene RE, Schlamm HT, Oestmann JW, et al. Imaging findings in acute invasive pulmonary aspergillosis., clinical significance of the halo sign[J]. Clin Infect Dis,2007,44(3):373-379.
  • 2Hot A, Maunoury C, Poiree S, et al. Diagnostic contribu- tion of the positron emission scanning with 18F-FDG for invasive fungal infections[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2010, 17(3) :409-417.
  • 3Koo S, Bryar J M, Page JH, et al. Diagnostic performance of the(1-3) beta-D-glucan assay for invasive fungal dis- ease[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2009,49 (11) :1650-1659.
  • 4Sulahian A,Boutboul F, Ribaud P, et al. Value of antigen detection using an enzyme immunoassay in the diagnosis and prediction of invasive aspergillosis in two adult and pediatric hematology units during a 4-year prospective study[J]. Cancer,2001,91(2) :311-318.
  • 5Bille J. New nonculture-based methods for the diagnosis of invasive andidiasis[J]. Curr Opin Care, 2010,16 (5) : 460-464.
  • 6Pagano L,Caira M, Valentini CG. Current therapeutic ap- proaches to fungal infections in immunocompromised he- matological patients[J]. Blood Rev,2010,24(2) :51-61.
  • 7血液病/恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌感染的诊断标准与治疗原则(第三次修订)[J].中华内科杂志,2010,49(5):451-454. 被引量:196
  • 8Garcia-Vidal C, Upton A, Kirby KA, et al. Epidemiology of invasive mold infections in allogeneic stem cell trans-plant recipients: biological risk factors for infection ac- cording to time after transplantation[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2008,47(8) : 1041-1050.
  • 9Glasmacher A,Prentice AG. Evidence based review of an- tifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with haema tological malignancies [ J ]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2005,56(1) :123-132.
  • 10Robenshtok E, Gafter-Gvili A, Goldberg E, et al. Antifun- gal prophylaxis in cancer patients after chemotherapy or hematopoietic stern cell transplantation:systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25 (34) : 5471- 5489.

共引文献195

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部