期刊文献+

近视儿童调节幅度训练有效性分析 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨应用综合验光仪查不同年龄段近视患儿调节幅度,经调节训练,调节幅度训练结果分布差异。方法:分析2425眼6—12岁近视儿童不同年龄段分组,经过3个月调节幅度训练,综合验光仪检查分析后,调节幅度训练结果分布差异情况,其中1906眼6~12岁近视儿童调节幅度提高至正常者近视增长情况。结果:6岁-组儿童调节幅度训练有效率高于8岁-组儿童,8岁-组儿童调节幅度训练有效率高于10岁-组儿童;近视患儿调节幅度提高至正常者,一年内近视增长〈0.25D者达80%以上。结论:近视儿童调节幅度训练总有效率达75%以上,而且年龄段越低,有效率越高,大多数近视患儿调节幅度提高至正常者一年内近视增长的幅度很小。延缓儿童近视进展,进行有效的调节幅度训练势在必行。
作者 李岩
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第25期4159-4160,共2页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献22

  • 1陈洁,吕帆,于旭东,涂昌森.眼调节幅度与近视眼的关系研究[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2004,22(12):1010-1013. 被引量:30
  • 2杨晓,龚向明,蓝卫中,杨智宽,陈翔,钟兴武,曾骏文.不同阅读距离对儿童近视调节反应的影响[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2006,24(2):138-141. 被引量:34
  • 3周之南,李连英.棱镜式组合透镜治疗近视眼疗效观察[J].中国误诊学杂志,2006,6(4):662-663. 被引量:4
  • 4马可,刘陇黔.青年人近视眼与各调节因素的关系[J].眼视光学杂志,2006,8(2):85-87. 被引量:24
  • 5李凤鸣.眼科全书[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.2575.
  • 6董国平.晶体操预防近视效果观察 [J].中国学校卫生,1999,20(1):65-65.
  • 7Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda, K. J., Hung G. K and Gilmartin. B,Tonic accommodation: a review I. Basic aspect. Ophthal. Physiol.Opt, 1993, 13:266~284
  • 8Jiang BC, Morse SE. Oculomotor functions and late - onset myopia Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1999, 19 (2): 165~172
  • 9Wold JE, Hu A, Chen S, Glasser A. Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 20 (10): 1878~1888
  • 10Kasthurirangan S, Vilupuru AS, Glasser A Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans Vision Res, 2003, 43 (27): 2945~2956

共引文献60

同被引文献56

  • 1Duane A. An attempt to determine the normal range of accommodation at various ages, being a revision of Don- der's experiments. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, 1908,11 (Pt 3):634-641.
  • 2Antona B, Barra F, Barrio A, et al. Repeatability in- traexaminer and agreement in amplitude of accommoda- tion measurements. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2009,247(1) : 121-127.
  • 3Ovenseri-Ogbomo GO, Kudjawu EP, Kio FE, et al. In- vestigation of amplitude of accommodation among Ghanaian school children. Clin Exp Optom, 2012,95 (2) : 187-191.
  • 4Drew SA, Borsting E, Stark LR, et al. Chromatic aber- ration, accommodation, and color preference in as- thenopia. Optom Vis Sci, 2012,89(7) :E1059-1067.
  • 5Leon AA, Medrano SM, Rosenfield M. A comparison of the reliability of dynamic retinoscopy and subjective mea- surements of amplitude of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2012,32(2) : 133-141.
  • 6Atchison DA, Capper EJ, McCabe KL. Critical subjec- tive measurement of amplitude of accommodation. Optom Vis Sci, 1994,71(11) :699-706.
  • 7Rosenfield M, Cohen AS. Push-up amplitude of accom- modation and target size. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1995, 15(3) :231-232.
  • 8Fitch RC. Procedural effects on the manifest human am- plitude of accommodation. Am I Optom Arch Am Acad Optom, 1971,48(11) :918-926.
  • 9Momeni-Moghaddam H, Wolffsohn JS, Azimi A, et al. Effect of target distance on accommodative amplitude measured using the minus lens technique. Clin Exp Op- tom, 2014,97(1) :62-65.
  • 10Iyamu E, Iyamu JE, Oghovwerha L. Anthropometry, amplitude of accommodation, and spherical equivalent refractive error in a nigerian population. ISRN Ophthal- mol, 2012:295-613.

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部