期刊文献+

动载确定方法对岩石动态断裂韧度测试的影响 被引量:5

Influence of different dynamic load calculating methods on rock dynamic fracture toughness test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了考察不同方法确定的动态载荷对测试岩石动态断裂韧度的影响,在SHPB压杆系统上动态冲击直径80 mm的大理岩圆孔裂缝平台巴西圆盘,获得了弹性压杆上的应力波形,间接计算得到3种不同的作用在圆盘端部的动态载荷。将载荷输入ANSYS动态有限元模型中,求得了相应的动态应力强度因子,并根据试验-数值分析方法确定了岩石的动态断裂韧度测试值。结果表明,在加载速率约为4.0×104MPa·m1/2/s的条件下,采用三波法确定的大理岩的平均动态断裂韧度为3.92 MPa·m1/2,采用一波法比三波法计算的结果偏低11.22%,采用二波法比三波法计算的结果偏高20.15%,3种方法得到的结果差异较大。应力波在传播过程中,通过圆盘表面和预制裂缝面发生散射,部分能量不断发生释放是造成圆盘试件两端加载载荷不相等的主要原因。三波法是3种方法中比较理想的动态载荷确定方法,但需要考察试件的动态应力平衡性。 To investigate the influence of testing rock dynamic fracture toughness by dynamic load calculated using different methods, some holed-crack flattened Brazilian disc specimens (HCFBD) with diameter of 80 mm are impacted in SHPB system. The stress waveforms in the elastic compression bar are got, and the dynamic loads applied on the disc are calculated indirectly using three kinds of methods. When the different loads are inputted in ANSYS dynamic finite element mode, the dynamic stress intensity factors could be made, and the corresponding test values of dynamic rock fracture toughness are got on the base of experimental--numerical method. Results show that the average dynamic fracture toughness of marble is 3.92 MPa· m^1/2, as the loading rate is about 4.0×104 MPa· m^1/2/s. Compared with the test value by "three wave method", it is 11.22% less by "one waves method"; and 20.15% more by "two waves method". So, the results are very different using three methods. The dynamic loads on both ends of disc specimen are not equal, because part of energy is released continually when the stress waves scatter through the surfaces and the prefabricated crack of the disc specimen in the whole transmission process. "Three waves method" is a relatively ideal one to determine the dynamic load on the disc specimen in three methods, but the dynamic stress balance should be surveyed.
出处 《岩土力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期2721-2726,共6页 Rock and Soil Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(No.51004043) 河南理工大学硕士学位论文创新基金(No.2011-M-39)
关键词 动态载荷 岩石动态断裂韧度 圆盘试件 分离式霍普金森压杆 三波法 dynamic load rock dynamic fracture toughness disc specimen split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) three wavesmethod
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1CHEN M, ZHANG G Q. Laboratory measurement and interpretation of the fracture toughness of formation rocks at great depth[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2004, 41 (1 -- 3 ): 221 -- 231.
  • 2董世明,夏源明.CCCD-SHPB动态断裂试验系统原理及数值分析[J].机械强度,2004,26(z1):184-187. 被引量:13
  • 3张盛,王启智.采用中心圆孔裂缝平台圆盘确定岩石的动态断裂韧度[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(6):723-728. 被引量:28
  • 4WEISBROD C- RITTEL D. A method for dynamic fracture toughness determination using short beams[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2000, 104(1): 89-- 103.
  • 5CHEN R, XIA K, DAI F, et al. Determination of dynamic fracture parameter using a semi-circular bend technique in split Hopkinson pressure bar testing[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2009, 76(9): 1268-- 1276.
  • 6WANG Q Z, XING L. Determination of fracture toughness by using the flattened Brazilian disk specimen for rocks[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1999, 64(2): 193--201.
  • 7ZHOU J, WANG Y, XIA Y M. Model fracture toughness of PMMA at high loading rates[J]. Journal of Material Science, 2006, 41 (24): 8363-- 8366.
  • 8陈刚,陶俊林,陈忠富,黄西成,徐伟芳.SHPB的径向惯性效应修正[J].西南科技大学学报,2008,23(2):15-18. 被引量:11
  • 9LAMBERT D E, ROSS C A. Strain rate et-lects on dynamic fracture and strength[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2000, 24(10): 985--998.
  • 10NAKANO M, KISHIDA K. Dynamic fracture initiation in brittle materials under combined mode HI loading[J]. Journal de Physique IV, 1994,4(C8):695--700.

二级参考文献52

共引文献65

同被引文献61

  • 1朱万成,黄志平,唐春安,逄铭璋.含预制裂纹巴西盘试样破裂模式的数值模拟[J].岩土力学,2004,25(10):1609-1612. 被引量:24
  • 2李战鲁,王启智.加载速率对岩石动态断裂韧度影响的实验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(12):2116-2120. 被引量:26
  • 3方修君,金峰.基于ABAQUS平台的扩展有限元法[J].工程力学,2007,24(7):6-10. 被引量:64
  • 4ISRM. Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geo- mechanics Abstracts, 1978, 15(1): 99-103.
  • 5LAVROV A, VERVOORT A, WEVERS M, et al. Experimental and numerical study of the Kaiser effect in cyclic Brazilian tests with disk rotation[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2002, 39(3): 287-302.
  • 6ERARSLAN NAZIFE, WILLIAMS DAVID JOHN. Experimental, numerical and analytical studies on tensile strength of rocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2012, 49(2): 21 -30.
  • 7ERARSLAN N, LIANG Z Z, WILLIAMS D J. Experimental and numerical studies on determination of indirect tensile strength of rocks[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2012, 45(5): 739-751.
  • 8SAKSALA T, HOKKA M, KUOKKALA V T, et al. Numerical modeling and experimentation of dynamic Brazilian disc test on Kuru granite[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2013, 59: 128-138.
  • 9CHEN C S, HSU S C. Measurement of indirect tensile strength of anisotropic rocks by the ring test[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2001, 34(4): 293- 321.
  • 10WANG Q Z, JIA X M, KOU S Q, et al. The flattened Brazilian disc specimen used for testing elastic modulus, tensile strength and fracture toughness of brittle rocks: analytical and numerical results[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2004, 41(2): 245-253.

引证文献5

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部