期刊文献+

经桡动脉途径介入治疗急性心肌梗死疗效观察

Clinical observation of transradial interventional treatment of acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察临床经桡动脉途径介入治疗急性心肌梗死的临床治疗效果。方法选取安庆市市立医院2010年5月至2012年5月收治的120例急性心肌梗死患者,随机分为对照组和观察组各60例,对照组给予常规经股动脉介入治疗,观察组给予经桡动脉介入治疗,观察两组临床治疗效果。结果观察组与对照组的穿刺时间、手术时间和穿刺成功率以及手术成功率比较无明显的差异(P>0.05);观察组患者住院时间和术后并发症发生率均明显的低于对照组,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急性心肌梗死患者给予经桡动脉途径介入治疗是可行的,并且术后并发症少。 Objective To observe the clinical transradial intervention for acute myocardial infarction clinical outcomes. Methods Totally 120 patients with acute myocardial infarction patients admitted to our hospital from May 2010 to May 2012 ,were randomly divided into control group and observation group,60 patients in the control group received routine through the femoral artery interventional treatment, the observation group given by the radial artery Intervention observed two sets of clinical outcomes. Results The puncture time of the observation group and the control group, the operative time and success rate, as well as the surgical success rate was no significant difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ) ; Observation group were hospital stay and postoperative complications were significantly lower than control group, the two groups was statisti- cally significant (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Patients with acute myocardial infarction give transradial intervention therapy is feasible, and fewer complications.
作者 黄盛
出处 《医药论坛杂志》 2013年第8期6-7,共2页 Journal of Medical Forum
关键词 急性 心肌梗死 介入治疗 桡动脉途径 Acute Myocardial infarction Intervention Radial artery
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

  • 1庞小华,牟华明,杨建军,邵江,张建明,涂雪梅,冯促进.经桡动脉冠脉介入治疗临床应用评价[J].重庆医学,2007,36(15):1526-1527. 被引量:8
  • 2CAMPEAU L.Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography[J].Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1989,16(1):3-7.
  • 3KIEMENEIJI F,LAARMAN G J,MELKER E D,et al.Transradial artery coronary angioplasty[J].Am Heart J,1995,129(2):1-8.
  • 4KIM M H,CHA K S,KIM H J,et al.Primary smming for acute myocardial infarction via the transradial approach:a safe and useful alternative to transfemoral approach[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2000,12(6):292-296.
  • 5KIEMENEIJI F,LAARMAN G J,ODEKERKEN D,et al.A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial,brachial,and femoral approaches:the access study[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1997,29(6):1269-1275.
  • 6APTECAR E.DUPOUY P,CHABANE-CHAOUCH M,et al.Percutaneous transulnar artery approach for diagnosic and therapeutic coronary intervention[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2005,17(6):312-317.
  • 7AMOROSO G.LAARMAN G J,KIEMENEIJ F.Overview of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention[J].J Cardiovasc Med(Hagerstown),2007,8(4):230-237.
  • 8GLASER R,GERTZ Z.MATTHAI W H,et al.Patient satisfaction is comparable to early discharge versus overnight observation after elective percutaneous coronary intervention[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2009,21(9):464-467.
  • 9KIM J Y,YOON J,JUNG H S,et al.Feasibility of the radial artery as a vascular access route in performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Yonsei Med J,2005,46:503.
  • 10SAITO S,IKEI H,HOSOKAWA G,et al.Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,1999,46:173.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部