大气科学类核心期刊综合评价指标的比较研究

Comparative Study on the Comprehensive Evaluation Index of Atmospheric Science Core Journals

归纳统计了10种大气科学类核心期刊2004-2011年共计8 a的资料,对期刊的总被引频次、影响因子、他引率、基金论文比、平均引文数这5个指标作了简单比较。结果表明:各期刊的总被引频次和平均引文数呈现逐年上升的趋势;影响因子呈波动变化,其中《气象》和《气象科技》的影响因子2011年是2004年的近4倍;他引率在8 a中变化不大,平均值大致在0.5～0.7之间,但各个期刊的他引率数值差别很大;基金论文比相差不大,大部分期刊都在0.9左右。通过几种指标的分析与比较,反映出了目前我国大气科学类核心期刊的发展现状。

The paper statistically analyzes the 10 kinds of atmospheric science core journals data from 2004 to 2011, and makes a simple comparison of the 5 indexes such as total citations, impact factor, other cited rate, fund paper ratio and average citation number. The results show that： the journals total citations and the average citation number showed a rising trend year by year. The impact factors are fluctuating, and the impact factor of ＂Meteorological Monthly＂ and ＂Meteorological Science and Technology＂ in 2011 was nearly 4 times in 2004. The other cited rate has a little change in 8 years, the average value is between 0.5--0.7, but the other cited rate varies greatly with various journals. The fund paper ratio has little difference, most journals are about 0.9. Through the analysis and comparison of several indexes, reflecting the current situation of Chinese core journals of atmospheric sciences.