期刊文献+

论国际人道法中的平民概念——兼评红十字国际委员会《解释性指南》 被引量:8

On the Concept of Civilian in International Humanitarian Law:with Comments on ICRC’s Interpretive Guidance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 平民是国际人道法的基础概念,国际人道法没有直接而是通过排除战斗员间接定义平民。由于战斗员概念本身比较模糊,形式要件要求超过实质要件要求,因此平民概念具有不确定性,而两分法和旋转门又加剧了平民概念的困境。红十字国际委员会在《解释性指南》中试图通过完善战斗员的实质要件以更好地界定平民,但其提出并依赖的两个关键标准,即持续作战职责和直接参加敌对行动,在理论和实践上均存在一定瑕疵。虽不具法律效力,但《解释性指南》代表了国际人道法在平民问题上的最新努力和进展,其所提供的逻辑框架和分析工具具有重要参考价值。继续深入讨论平民问题并形成有关国际习惯法或国际条约,是妥善解决平民概念不确定性较为现实和可行的途径。 Civilian is the basic concept in international humanitarian law.Rather than directly,international humanitarian law defines civilian indirectly by excluding combatant.As the vagueness of combatant and the fact pro forma requirements for combatant surpasses its substantial counterparts,which brings about uncertainty to the concept of civilian,with dichotomy and revolving door aggravating things even worse.Although the Interpretive Guidance by ICRC tries to complete substantial requirements of combatant to better define civilian,unfortunately,two key standards ICRC presents and relies on are flawed either in theory or in practice.Though not legally binding,the Interpretive Guidance represents the latest efforts and progress on civilian in international humanitarian law and the logic framework and analyze tool it provides are of great reference value.The realistic and feasible way uncertainty of civilian’s concept gets solved properly is to continue in-depth discussion on civilian-related issues and to develop pertinent customary international law or international treaty.
作者 朱路
出处 《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期103-112,163,共10页 Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点基地重大项目<全球安全基本法律问题研究>(批准号:12JJD820004) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目<当代战争私有化与国际法的未来发展>(批准号:2013M530586)
关键词 国际人道法 平民 战斗员 持续作战职责 直接参加敌对行动 international humanitarian law civilian combatant continuous combat function direct participation in hostilities
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1G.I.A.D.Draper.The Legal Classification of Belligerent Individuals[C]//M.A.Meyer & H.McCoubrey (eds.).Reflections on Law and Armed Conflict.The Hague:Kluwer Law International,1998.
  • 2Christopher Greenwood.A Critique of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions of 1949[C]//Helen Durham & Timothy L.H.McCormack (eds.).The Changing Face of Conflict and the Efficacy of International Law.The Hague:Kluwer law International,1999.
  • 3Kenneth Watkin.21st Century Conflict and International Humanitarian Law:Status Quo or Change?[C]//Michael Schmitt & Jelena Pejic (eds.).International Law and Armed Conflict:Exploring the Faultlines.Leiden/Boston:Brill,2007.
  • 4Knut Doermann.The Legal Situation of Unlawful/Unprivileged Combatants[J].International Review of the Red Cross,2003,(849).
  • 5红十字国际委员会.解释性指南[M].北京:[出版者不详],2009.
  • 6Jean-Marie Henckaerts & Louise Doswald-Beck (eds.).Customary International Humanitarian Law:Rules[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005.
  • 7Jean-Marie Henckaerts & Louise Doswald-Beck (eds.). Customary International Humanitarian Law:Rules [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge U- niversity Press, 2005 : 3 - 76.
  • 8Jean-Marie Henckaerts & Louise Doswald-Beck ( eds. ). Customary International Humanitarian Law: Practice [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005 : 3 - 450.
  • 9《第一附加议定书》第43条第2款.
  • 10Art. 155, Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field ( Lieber Code). 24 April 1863 [ EB/OL]. ( 1863 -04 -24) [2012 - I0 -20]. http://www, ierc. org/ihl nsf/FULL/ll0? OpenDocument.

共引文献2

同被引文献57

  • 1朱锋.“非传统安全”解析[J].中国社会科学,2004(4):139-146. 被引量:131
  • 2《第一附加议定书》第43条第2款.
  • 3Jean-Marie Henckaerts & Louise Doswald-Beck (eds.). Customary International Humanitarian Law:Rules. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 2005 : 79 - 102.
  • 4《解释性指南》中文版,第58页.
  • 5红十字国际委员会.国际人道法中直接参加敌对行动定义的解释性指南·中文版[M].北京:出版者不详,2009.39,41,44,45,46,49-50,49,51-53,51,52,54-55,79,56,56-61,64,65,63,63-64,64,65,65,68,70,69,33.
  • 6I ICRC. Additional Protocol I Commentary, para. 551 [ EB/OL]. http ://www. icrc. org/ihl, nsf/COM/470 - 7500t 8 .90penDoc- ument, 2012 -09 -27.
  • 7ICRC. Additional Protocol I Commentary, para. 550 [ EB/OL]. http ://www. icrc. org./ihl, nsf/COM/470 - 750018? OpenDoc- ument, 2012 -09 -27.
  • 8Michael N. Schmitt. Deconstructing Direct Participation in Hostilities: The Constitutive Elements[.l]. N. Y. U. Journal of In- ternational Law and Politics, 2010, (42) :720,728.
  • 9ICRC. Additional Protocol I Commentary, para. 1692 [ EB/OL]. http ://www. icrc. org/ihl, nsf/COM/470 - 750054 .9 Open- Document ,2012-09-28.
  • 10Project of an International Declaration concerning the Laws and Customs of War. Brussels, 27 August 1874, Arts. 9-11 [EB/OL] [2012-10-20]. http ://wwwfiere.org/ihknsf/385ee082b509e76e41256739003e636d/a59f58bbf95aea8be 125641 e003232af! OpenDoeument. Convention (11) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. The Hague, 29 July 1899[EB/OL] [2012-10-20]. http ://www.icre.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/ 1507 OpenDoeument. Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. The Hague, 18 October 1907 [EB/OL] [2012-10-20]. http://www.iere.org/ihl.nsf/ FULL/195? OpenDoeument.

引证文献8

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部