期刊文献+

组织二元性的研究综述与展望 被引量:6

Review and Prospects of Organization Ambidexterity
原文传递
导出
摘要 面临不稳定、复杂的环境,平衡矛盾的能力已经成为了组织长期生存或发展的关键,因此组织二元性受到学术界的广泛关注。但是已有研究对于组织二元性的涵义、前因、与绩效的关系等未达成共识,还是有很多最新的研究加入讨论,本文对这三个方面进行了回顾和梳理,并以此为基础提出未来研究展望。 Facing unstable, complex environment, capacity of balancing conflicting has become the key of the organization long-term survival or development. So organizations ambidexterity have gotten a lot of academic attention. But existing research about definition of organization ambidexterity, antecedents of organization ambidexterity, and its relationship with performance have not reached a consensus. There are still a lot of new research involved in the discussion. In this paper,these three aspects are reviewed. And based on that,future research prospects are proposed.
作者 张钢 陈佳乐
出处 《世界科技研究与发展》 CSCD 2013年第4期526-529,共4页 World Sci-Tech R&D
关键词 组织二元性 二元性的组织 平衡 绩效 organization ambidexterity ambidexterous organization trade-off performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1DUNCAN R B. The ambidextrous organization : Designing dual struc- tures for innovation [ J ]. The management of organization design : Strat- egies and Implement, 1976,1 : 167-188.
  • 2MARCH J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning [ J ]. Organization science, 1991,2 ( 1 ) :71-87.
  • 3BENNER M J, TUSHMAN M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management : The productivity dilemma revisited [ J ]. The Academy of Management Review ,2003,28 ( 2 ) :238-256.
  • 4SIGGELKOW N, LEVINTHAL D A. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation [ J ]. Organization Science, 2003, 14 (6) :650-669.
  • 5SIGGELKOW N, LEVINTHAL D A. Escaping real (non-benign) competency traps:Linking the dynamics of organizational structure to the dynamics of search [ J ]. Strategic organization, 2005,3 ( 1 ) : 85- 115.
  • 6BURGELMAN R A. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolution- ary lock-in [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2002,47 ( 2 ) : 325- 357.
  • 7TUSHMAN M L,O'REILLY C A. Ambidextrous organizations:manag- ing evolutionary and revolutionary change[ J ]. California Management Review,1996,38 (4) :8-30.
  • 8ADLER P S. , GOLDOFTAS B, LEVINE D I. Flexibility versus effi- ciency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [ J ]. Organization science, 1999,10 ( 1 ) :43-68.
  • 9He Z L, Wong P K. Exploration vs. exploitation:An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[ J]. Organization science,2004,15 (4) : 481 -494.
  • 10GIBSON C B, BIRKINSHAW J. The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal,2004,47 ( 2 ) : 209 -226.

二级参考文献110

  • 1S. L. Brown & K. M. Eisenhardt," The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 1(1997) ,pp. 1 - 34.
  • 2M. L. Tushman ~ C. A. O'Reilly,"Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change,"California Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 4 (1996), pp. 8 - 30.
  • 3S. Raisch, J. Birkinshaw & G. Probst, et al,"Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance,"Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 4(2009), pp. 685 - 695.
  • 4R. B. Duncan,"The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation,"The Management of Organization Design : Strategies and Implementation ,Vol. 1(1976) ,pp. 167 - 188.
  • 5D. A. Levinthal & J. G. March,"The Myopia of Learning," Strategic Management Journal,Vol. 14(1993), pp. 95 - 112.
  • 6J. G. March,"Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,"Organization Science, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1991) ,pp. 71 - 87.
  • 7S. Raisch & J. Birkinshaw," Organizational Ambidexterity.. Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators," Journal of Management ,Vol. 34,No. 3(2008), pp. 375 - 409.
  • 8Z. Simsek, C. Heavey & J. F. Veiga, et al,"A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes ,"Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, No. 5 (2009), pp. 864 -894.
  • 9J. W. Rivkin & N. Siggelkow," Balancing Search and Stability.. Interdependencies among Elements Organizational Design,"Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 3 ( 2003), pp. 290 - 311.
  • 10P. S. Adler, B. Goldoftas & D. I. Levine,"Flexibility versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System,"Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 1 ( 1999), pp. 43 - 68.

共引文献231

同被引文献82

  • 1王沛,林崇德.社会认知的理论模型综述[J].心理科学,2002,25(1):73-75. 被引量:33
  • 2李海舰,原磊.论无边界企业[J].中国工业经济,2005(4):94-102. 被引量:182
  • 3张玉利,李乾文.双元型组织研究评介[J].外国经济与管理,2006,28(1):1-8. 被引量:51
  • 4钱德勒.大企业和国民财富[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
  • 5奥利弗E.威廉姆森.资本主义经济制度(中文版)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2014.
  • 6奥利弗E.威廉姆森.市场与层级制:分析与反托拉斯含义(中文版)[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2011.
  • 7Christensen C M. The Innovator's Dilemma[M]. Bos- ton: Harvard Business Review Press, 1997.
  • 8Applegate L M, Bruce H J. don't just survive-thrive: leading innovation in good times and bad[D]. Boston: Harvard Business School, 2009.
  • 9March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational leaming[J]. Organization Science, 1991,2(1):71-87.
  • 10OECD. The measurement of scientific and technological activities Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and in- terpreting innovation data[R]. (3rd ed). Paris: OECD Eurosta(, 2005.

引证文献6

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部