期刊文献+

动态环境对企业非市场资源与绩效关系的调节效应研究——一个研究设计

下载PDF
导出
摘要 企业业绩的提高是战略管理的核心,非市场领域的战略研究是解释绩效差异性的重要方面。本研究设计试图从环境的复杂性和竞合性—动态环境的视角,探讨动态环境特征对于非市场资源与绩效的调节作用。在26家企业、政府及协会负责人和理论回顾的基础上,将非市场资源划分为组织非市场资源与高管非市场资源,并利用市场绩效和合法性来衡量企业绩效。试图通过扩充非市场资源与绩效内涵,并将动态环境特征作为调节变量,探讨不同的环境特征下,不同的非市场资源对于不同绩效的影响作用。文章初步假设企业非市场资源包含的组织非市场资源与高管非市场资源都会显著提高企业绩效;在高竞合—复杂性高、低竞合—复杂性高的环境特征中,相较于组织非市场资源,高管非市场资源对企业绩效的正影响都更显著;在高竞合—复杂性低,低竞合—复杂性低的环境特征中,相较于高管非市场资源,组织非市场资源对于两种绩效的正影响都更显著。该研究从理论上可以验明动态环境对于非市场层面研究的意义,实践层面更能予企业以指导性。
出处 《兰州学刊》 CSSCI 2013年第1期122-128,共7页
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Guthrie. D. , Between Market and Politics: Organizational Responses to Reform in China [ J ]. American Journal of Sociology, 1997 ( 102 ) : 1258 - 1304. 121.
  • 2Peng M. , Heath P. , The Growth of the Firm in Planned Economies in Transition : Institutions, Organizations and Strategies Choices [ J ]. The Academy of Management Review. 1996 (21) : 492 - 528.
  • 3卫武.中国环境下企业政治资源、政治策略和政治绩效及其关系研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(2):95-109. 被引量:92
  • 4Lawrence, Paul R. , Jay W. Lorsch. Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1967, 12(1): 1-47.
  • 5Kamoche K. , Miguel C. P. , Minimal Structures: From Jazz Improvisa- tion to Product Innovation[ J ]. Organization Studies, 2001, 22 ( 5 ) : 733 -764.
  • 6Cunha P. M. , Cunha V. J. , Kamoche K. , Organizational Improvisa- tion : What, When, How and Why [ J ]. International Journal of Manage- ment Reviews,1999(13) :299-341.
  • 7weick K. E. ,Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis [ J ]. Organization Science, 1998,9 (5) :543 - 555.

二级参考文献36

  • 1.《上海市长痛斥行业协会弊端》[N].《南方都市报》,2004年3月2日.
  • 2Amit R. & Sehoemaker, H,1993,"Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent", Strategic Management Journal, (14): pp.33-46.
  • 3Barney JB, 1991, "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage ",Journal of Management, ( 17 ): pp .99-120.
  • 4Blair, J. & Fottler, M,1990,"Challenges in Health Care Management: Strategic Perspectives for Managing Key Stakeholders",San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • 5Brcnnan, S,1980,"Corporate Political Activity: An Exploratory Study in a Developing Industry",Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, (2): pp.197-236.
  • 6Churchill, G. A.,1979,"A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs",Journal of Marketing Research, (16): pp.64-73.
  • 7Das T K & Teng Bing-Sheng, 2000, "A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances", Journal of Management, 26 ( 1 ):pp.31-61.
  • 8Davis, B, 1998, "CEOs, Stymied in Capital on Trade,Lobby Hinterland", Wall Street Journal, June: p.A30.
  • 9Douglas, D, 1995, "Corporate Political Activity as a Competitive Strategy: Influencing Public Policy to Increase firm Performance", PH.D. Thesis, Texas A&M University.
  • 10Elaine, M,1993,"A Resource-based Perspective on the Dynamic Strategy-performance Relationship: An Empirical Examination of the Focus and Differentiation Strategies in Entrepreneurial Firms", Journal of Management, Winter, 19 (4):pp.819~840.

共引文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部