期刊文献+

关于投保人故意杀害被保险人之法律条款的思考

The Thinking about The Law of Policy Holder kills Insured Intentionally
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2009年我国新颁布的保险法就投保人故意杀害被保险人的行为规定保险人可以免责。保险法认为这属于骗取保险金行为,保险公司由此可以免责。但是保险人是否能够因为投保人的故意行为而免责,这并不是一个一概而论的问题,需要针对不同的情况做出具体的分析。在分析各种情况均遵循一个前提:排除被保险人与投保人合谋导致保险事故意骗取保险金的行为。即均认定被保险人是理性人不考虑被保险人以牺牲自己的身体为代价获取保险金。那么这个问题的关键点在于投保人是否为自己的利益投保。文章所坚持的观点是完全不可免责制,其基于维护被保险人的利益。在整个事件中被保险人始终是受害者,且从订立保险契约的角度,保护被保险人的利益是整个契约形成的基础和最终目标。如果投保人故意伤害被保险人造成保险事故,文章所认定的是请求保险权利归于没有参与犯罪行为的其他受益人,若没有符合条件的受益人则权利归于被保险人的合法财产继承人执行。 According to the new insurance law in our country in 2009, if the policy-holder intentionally killed the insured, the in- surance company may avoid the responsibility. The Insurance Law insists that this behavior belongs to cheating money from insurance company. In fact whether the insurer can exempt from responsibility because of the policy-holder's intentional acts, it needs to make spe- cific decisions for different situations. Situations analysed in the paper all follow a premise: exclude insurant and policy-holder conspired to make insurance accident happen in order to defraud insurance. We all think that the insured is rational people, so they cannot just for insurance benefit at the cost of hurting their body. So the key point of the problem is whether policy-holder to insure their own interests. This article holds that insurer is absolutely not be exempted from liability, and it is based on the interests of insured. Throughout the event the insured is always a victim, and from the angle of conclude insurance contract to protect the interests of the insured is the soul of the whole contract form and ultimate goal. This paper identified that if the policy holder intentionally damage or make insurant disability, insurance right belongs to other beneficiaries, who was not involved in crime. And insurance right belongs to legal heir to the proporty if there is no eligible beneficiary.
作者 张翼
机构地区 东北财经大学
出处 《铜陵学院学报》 2013年第3期70-74,共5页 Journal of Tongling University
关键词 投保人 保险人 受益人 保险金 被保险人 policy holder, insurer beneficiary insurance benefit insured
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1樊启荣,程芳.投保人、受益人故意杀害被保险人之法律效果.中顾法律网.2013_01-30.
  • 2陈云中.人寿保险契约受益人及其相关问题之研究.保险专刊第44辑.
  • 3施文森.保险法论文集(第一集).台湾:五南图书公司,1985.10-15K45.
  • 4肯尼思·布莱克,哈罗德·斯基博,等.人寿与健康保险.北京:经济科学出版社.2003.50-56.
  • 5樊启荣.美国保险法上“合理期待原则”评析[J].法商研究,2004,21(3):117-126. 被引量:54
  • 6边文覆.保险欺诈保险研究.北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社2006.19-20.

二级参考文献25

  • 1[美]约翰·亨利·梅利曼 顾培东 禄正平译.《大陆法系》[M].法律出版社,2004年版.第87页.第44页.
  • 2See Scott B. Krider, The Rtmastruxction of Insurance Contracts Under the Doctrine of Reascoable Expectations,18J. MARSHALL. REV. 155(1984).
  • 3Delancy v. Rockingham Farmers Mutual Insurance Co, 52 N.H. 581,587(1913).
  • 4Bowler v .Fidelity and Contyact and Choice of New York, 53 N.J.313,250 A. 2d 580 (1969).
  • 5Abranham, Freedom Contract and Coice of Law in Insurance, 93 Harvard Law Review 1981, p. 109.
  • 6Stephen J. Ware,A Critique of the Returnable Expectations Doctrine ,56 University of Chicago Law Review 1461,1463-1475(Fall 1989), p.267, p.296.
  • 7Mark C. Rahdert, Reasonable Expectations Reconsidered,18 Connecticut Law Review 323, 334 (1986).
  • 8Aiu ins co v fmc corp ,247 calrptr 820, 831 (1990).
  • 9Abrahams v. Medkerranean Ins & Reins Co Ltd (1991) 1 LIoyd's Rep,p. 114.
  • 10Youell v. Blard Wdch & Co Ltd(1992) 2 Loyd's Rep p. 127.

共引文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部