期刊文献+

AAA算法和PBC算法在鼻咽癌调强放疗中剂量分布的比较 被引量:6

Comparison of Dose Distribution of Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) and Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) Algorithm for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Treatment of Nasopharyngeal
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较瓦里安Eclipse治疗计划系统中AAA算法和PBC算法在鼻咽癌调强放疗中靶区的剂量分布和危及器官受照剂量的差别。方法:选择我科治疗的鼻咽癌患者10例,分别采用Eclipse(7.6版本)治疗计划系统中AAA算法和PBC算法进行调强优化,优化条件相同,计算剂量分布。分析并比较10例患者的靶区、危及器官的受照剂量。结果:发现PBC算法和AAA算法对靶区剂量(PTV)影响不大,对脑干、晶体、视神经、脊髓四种危及器官的影响中,晶体的剂量差别较大,其次为视神经。结论:分析晶体受照剂量差别大的主要原因是晶体的受照剂量主要来自光栅运动中散射,AAA算法对散射的修正比PBC算法更为精确,所以在鼻咽癌调强治疗计划中AAA算法更为精确。 Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the dose distribution of PTV and OARs dose between IMRT plans for Nasopharyngeal using anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and pencil beam convolution (PBC) methods in the Eclipse planning system (Varian Medical Systems). Methods: For 10 patients with Nasopharyngeal, using Eclipse planning system to create treatment plans with AAA and PBC algorithms, and the setting conditions of these treatment plans were identical. Analyz- ing and comparing dose distribution of PTV and OARs dose for treatment plans of 10 patients. Results:There was no signifi- cant difference in the doses of the PTV;For the dose of OARs, the dose difference of Len was largest compared with Brain stem, Optic nerve, Spinal. Conclusions:The main dose of Len was caused by the scatter. Comparing with the PBC algorithm, AAA al- gorithm has shown good accuracy for scatter dose calculating, so AAA algorithm is more accurate for Nasopharyngeal
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2013年第4期4245-4247,4277,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
关键词 AAA算法 PBC算法 鼻咽癌 剂量 AAA algorithm PBC algorithm Nasopharyngeal Dose
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献22

  • 1戴建荣,胡逸民.调强放疗的计划设计[J].中国医疗器械信息,2005,11(2):9-12. 被引量:27
  • 2翟振宇,何侠,魏青,张宜勤.鼻咽癌调强放射治疗的剂量学特点[J].肿瘤学杂志,2005,11(5):337-340. 被引量:21
  • 3陈广涛,王静,翟振宇,殷旭东,童建东,袁昕.鼻咽癌调强放疗布野方案剂量学比较[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2007,24(4):235-239. 被引量:9
  • 4Kam MK, Chau RM, Petruzzeli GJ, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: dosimetric advantage over conventional plans and feasibility of dose escalation [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003,56:145-157.
  • 5Cozzi L, Fogliata A, Bolsi A, et al. Three-dimensional conformal VS intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer patients: comparative analysis of dosimetric and technical parameters [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004,58:617-624.
  • 6Lee N, Xia P, Quivey JM, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002,53:12-22.
  • 7Wu Q W, Mohan R, Morris M, et al. Simulataneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas.Ⅰ: Dosimetric results [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003,56(2):573-585.
  • 8[美]克利福德,等.实用肿瘤调强放射治疗[M].冯平柏主译.南京:江苏科学技术出版社,2006,1-33.
  • 9Radiation Therapy Oneology Group (RTOG) 0225. A phase Ⅱ study of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)+/- chemotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer [N]. Version Date: 2003,August 19.
  • 10Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue tu therapeutic irridiation [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1991,21(1): 109-122.

共引文献31

同被引文献49

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部