期刊文献+

Prestige^(TM)-LP颈椎人工椎间盘置换后椎体应力及关节突关节间压力有限元分析 被引量:3

Finite Element Analysis on Vertebral Stress Distributions And Pressure Variations of Facet Joint Following Prestige^(TM)-LP Artificial Disc Replacement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析PrestigeTM-LP颈椎人工椎间盘对椎体的应力和关节间压力作用,了解节段间运动载荷传递方式及作用机制。方法:通过实体CT扫描方式建立颈4~5节段PrestigeTM-LP人工椎间盘置换有限元模型。生理载荷下前屈、后伸、左侧弯、左轴向旋转时测量颈5椎体应力和颈4-5关节突间压力变化。结果:运动加载后C5椎体应力均有不同程度增大,表现出与运动加载方向一致的应力偏移改变。相比于前屈,后伸时双侧关节突间压力明显增大。左侧弯时左侧关节突间压力增大,左轴向旋转时右侧关节突间压力明显增大。结论:采用有限元模型进行骨性结构的应力及压力分析具有形象及精确的优点。PrestigeTM-LP颈椎人工椎间盘置换有效地起到椎体间应力传递和保留关节突关节间压力作用,具有接近正常颈椎的生物力学特性。 Objetcive: To analyse on vertebral stress distributions and pressure variations of facet joint. To better understand the load transfer pattern and mechanical effect following artificial disc replacement. Methods: The FEM of C4-C5 following Prestige^TM-LP artificial disc replacement was established by transferring the CT date to finite element modeling software. Analysis on C5 vertebral stress and C4-C5 facet joint pressure were conducted under normal physiologic loads in flexion, extension, left lateral bending and left axial rotation. Results: Motion loads induces C5 vertebral stress increase and stress distributions present displacement conformed with motion direction. Facet joint pressure increases obviously on extension more than flexion. Left facet joint pressure increases obviously on left lateral bending and right facet joint pressure increases obviously on left axial rotation respectively. Conclusions: The FEM possesses a high precision and visual image on stress analysis of skelecton structure. Prestige^TM-LP artificial disc prosthesis well preserves intervertebral stress transfer and contact pressures in facet joint, possesses biomechanical character near normal cervical spine.
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2013年第4期4311-4315,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
基金 国家863课题(2012AA02A603)
关键词 人工椎间盘 有限元 应力 颈椎 Artificial disc finite element model(FEM ) stress cervical spine
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Liu F, Cheng J, Komistek RD,等.正常颈椎、前路颈椎融合内固定术后和颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后颈椎运动特性的评价[J].脊柱,2007,32(23),pp2578-2584.
  • 2Ajay J, David AC, Eubulus JK, 等.颈椎人工椎间盘置换未能影响相邻节段退变发生率:三处前瞻性的随机临床试验共93例报告[J].脊柱杂志,2010,10(12):1043-1048.
  • 3Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R,等.食品和药物管理局主持的ProDisc-C颈椎人工椎问盘置换术与前路颈椎融合固定术对单节段颈椎病治疗效果的前瞻性、随机对照的多中心研究结果[J].脊柱杂志,2009,9(4):275-286.
  • 4Galbusera F,Bellini CM,Raimondi MT,等.颈椎椎问盘假体植入后的生物力学[J].医学工程与物理学,2008,30(9):1127-1133.
  • 5Li Xin-Feng, Dai Li-Yang. 颈椎脊髓的三维有限元模型:损伤机制的初步分析结果[J].脊柱,2009,34(11):pp1140-1147.
  • 6Yoganandan N, Kumaresan SC, Pintar FA.颈椎生物力学2:颈椎软组织的力学反应及生物力学模型[J].临床生物力学,2001,16:1-27.
  • 7Yoganandan N, Kumaresan SC, Pintar FA .人体颈椎韧带的几何图形及力学性质[J].生物医学工程学杂志,2000,122(6):623-629.
  • 8郭予立,瞿东滨,史占军.人工颈椎间盘置换术的研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(23):1809-1811. 被引量:2
  • 9Rousseau MA, Bonnet X, Skalli, W.球窝结构的颈椎椎间假体的几何形状的影响:一项有限元实验[J].脊柱,2008,33(1):ppE10-E14.
  • 10Galbusera F, Fantigrossi A, Raimondi MT,等.颈5-6椎间盘髓核假体置换前后的生物力学[J].生物力学和机械生物学模型,2006,5(4):253-261.

二级参考文献69

  • 1袁文.融合还是置换:对颈椎植骨融合术的再认识[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(1):11-14. 被引量:19
  • 2王岩,肖嵩华,陆宁,张雪松,刘郑生,刘保卫,张永刚,张西峰,王征,毛克亚.单双节段Bryan颈椎间盘假体置换术后1~8个月临床资料分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(1):14-17. 被引量:24
  • 3徐波,金大地,史占军,朱青安,钟世镇.中下颈椎双侧小关节部分切除对颈椎稳定性影响的生物力学研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1995,5(3):115-118. 被引量:20
  • 4Kowalski RJ,Ferrara LA,Benzel EC,et al.Biomechanics of the spine.Neurosurg.2005;15(1):42-59.
  • 5Hsu WH,Benzel EC,Chen TY.et al.Axial and coronal orientationof subaxial cervical zygapophysial joints and their effect on axialrotation and lateral bending.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2008;33(22):2409-2414.
  • 6Schmidt H,Heuer F,Claes L,et al.The relation between theinstantaneous center of rotation and facet joint forces-A finiteelement analysis.Clin Biomech (Bristol,Avon).2008;23(3):270-278.
  • 7Chang UK,Kim DH,Lee MC.et al.Changes in adjacent-level discpressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty comparedwith cervical discectomy and fusion.J Neurosurg Spine.2007;7(1):33-39.
  • 8Luo ZP,Buttermann GR,Lewis JL.Determination of spinal facetjoint loads from extra articular strains-a theoretical validation.JBiomech.1996;29(6):785-790.
  • 9Miura T,Panjabi MM,Cripton PA.A method to simulate in vivocervical spine kinematics using in vitro compressive preload.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2002;27(1):43-48.
  • 10Yue WM,Brodner W,Highland TR.Long-term results afteranterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating:a 5-to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study.Spine (PhilaPa 1976).2005;30(19):2138-2144.

共引文献10

同被引文献25

  • 1Mcafee PC,Reah C,Gilder K,et al. A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion:results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients[J]. Spine,2012,37(11):943-952.
  • 2Delamarter RB,Zigler J. Five-year reoperation rates,cervical total disc replacement versus fusion,results of a prospective randomized clinical trial[J]. Spine,2013,38(9):711-717.
  • 3Darden BV. ProDisc-C cervical disk arthroplasty[J]. Seminars Spine Surg,2012,24(3):8-13.
  • 4Park JH,Rhim SC,Roh SW. Mid-term follow-up of clinical and radiologic outcomes in cervical total disk replacement(Mobi-C):incidence of heterotopic ossification and risk factors[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2011,26(3):141-145.
  • 5Pimenta L,McAfee P,Crockard A,et al. The PCM cervitech cervical artificial disc vs the Bryan disc system medtronic in one year follow up[J]. Spine J,2004,4(10):448.
  • 6Shikinami Y,Kawabe Y,Yasukawa K,et al. A biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc system composed of a cubic three-dimensional fabric[J]. Spine J,2010,10(2):141-152.
  • 7Kim HM,Takadama H,Miyaji F,et al. Formation of bioactive functionally graded structure on Ti-6Al-4V alloy by chemical surface treatment[J]. J Materials Science,2000,11(9):555-559.
  • 8Wilke HJ,Krischak S,Wenger K,et al. Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine:experimental results and comparison to known human data[J]. Europ Spine J,1997,6(2):129-137.
  • 9Anderson PA,Rouleau JP,Bryan VE,et al. Wear analysis of the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis[J]. Spine,2003,28(20 Suppl):S186-S194.
  • 10David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthro-plasty:minimum 10-year follow-up of the Charite artificial disc in 106 patients[J]. Spine,2007,32(6):661-666.

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部